No reason to use it, that's the whole idea, get rid of the built in expander which is the work of the devil, use a bushing to size down just enough so the expander you will use does just a hair of work on all of the case necks.I do not see the point in keeping the expander ball in the FL Bushing Die if I'm using a Bushing. Is there a reason to keep it in?
Thanks.
I do not see the point in keeping the expander ball in the FL Bushing Die if I'm using a Bushing. Is there a reason to keep it in?
Thanks.
No reason to use it, that's the whole idea, get rid of the built in expander which is the work of the devil, use a bushing to size down just enough so the expander you will use does just a hair of work on all of the case necks.
This IME is one of those things that is reallllly tough to see improvements or decline on paper, I can’t name a single person that can shoot the difference between back sizing with a mandrel or one direction sizing. Even turning necks, the brass will have imperfections so in my little corner I think that if a fella believes it helps then great but some of the top shooters in the world don’t use a mandrel or turn necks.If you have not neck turned your brass, then the bushing will push any anomalous high points to the inside, putting it in contact with the bullet, making the brass’ grip on the bullet inconsistent around the circumference.
So if we’re using bushings, but not neck turning, then we need to use a mandrel expander like Walkalong shared above to push those imperfections back to the outside of the neck, allowing more consistent contact between neck and bullet.