All of this is pure crapola
These devices, however painful, are an acceptance of victimization.
It misses the other fundamental evil of a rape: dignity.
The woman must still suffer the indignity of penetration.
IOW she has in fact been raped, and sufered that humiliating assault. The device didnt prevent rape at all. it only prevented the rapists' ejaculation.
These devices are simply "getting back" at her rapist AFTER the fact. It shows how dysfunctional the modern woman has become in believing what must be assumptions behind the decision to use this device:
1. The possibility of rape exists
2. You may be raped
3. overpowering you, the rapist will penetrate you which defines the act
numbers 1 & 2 are of course true. Number 3 though implies inevitability that she will be overpowered; that the woman can not and/or SHOULD NOT do anything about it and can only react after penetration has occured. A woman who choses this means of 'defense' has already resigned herself to accepting the rape and that her only option left is to lacerate his member while being raped.
That assumption is made by a woman who has already given up on defending her basic human dignity and is the worst possible loss of perspective and of what is right and wrong.
This is a mostly male forum, to be sure, and I know the women here are most likely to agree that prevention is the only way to thwart a rapist and preserve that basic human dignity. I only hope other women, unlike the 300 who bought those damn belts, realize it.
C-
Preacherman said:
The big problem with devices using hooks, harpoons, etc. is that one does NOT want the rapist's bodily fluids (including blood) to be in a position to infect one with whatever nasty diseases he may be carrying. These anti-rape devices may prevent ejaculation, but if he's bleeding all over you, this kinda defeats the object of the exercise...
:banghead: 
)
