This was mentioned in another thread but you have to read three pages to get to it, and since this is new it seems to deserve its own thread. The link is to a letter by Robert Levy - atty in the Parker Case and it explains his concerns about the NRA's recent actions that seem designed to undermine that case.
http://www.examiner.com/a-653443~Ro...r_the_courts_decide_D_C__gun_ban_s_fate_.html
If this link doesn't work go to KABA and it is listed under today’s (4/4/07) news links.
I'm sorry; I have always supported the NRA and defended them against attacks by both anti-gun activists and second amendment purists. But for me this goes beyond the pale.
The NRA has asked its members (of which I am one) to support the legislation that would repeal the DC gun laws and thus void Parker as it would make the case moot - and yet say publicly that they support the Parker case. That is either rank ignorance or disingenuousness at best. As I don't credit the NRA leadership as being idiots, it would seem to be the later.
I understand the reticence of some and their fear of losing the case. But there is no honor in saying you support, something as the NRA has said they do the Parker case, and then working to undermine it. If the NRA does not support the Parker case then they need to say so and state their reasons rather than to pretend that they support it in order to mollify that percentage of their members that do support it.
While I understand the fear that some have about losing this case, it is also true that freedom was not won, nor has it ever been kept without taking a risk. Besides if one has not noticed the Supreme Court does not have the final say in this matter no matter what they rule. Government cannot alienate an inalienable right - they can merely recognize it or refuse to recognize it.
http://www.examiner.com/a-653443~Ro...r_the_courts_decide_D_C__gun_ban_s_fate_.html
If this link doesn't work go to KABA and it is listed under today’s (4/4/07) news links.
I'm sorry; I have always supported the NRA and defended them against attacks by both anti-gun activists and second amendment purists. But for me this goes beyond the pale.
The NRA has asked its members (of which I am one) to support the legislation that would repeal the DC gun laws and thus void Parker as it would make the case moot - and yet say publicly that they support the Parker case. That is either rank ignorance or disingenuousness at best. As I don't credit the NRA leadership as being idiots, it would seem to be the later.
I understand the reticence of some and their fear of losing the case. But there is no honor in saying you support, something as the NRA has said they do the Parker case, and then working to undermine it. If the NRA does not support the Parker case then they need to say so and state their reasons rather than to pretend that they support it in order to mollify that percentage of their members that do support it.
While I understand the fear that some have about losing this case, it is also true that freedom was not won, nor has it ever been kept without taking a risk. Besides if one has not noticed the Supreme Court does not have the final say in this matter no matter what they rule. Government cannot alienate an inalienable right - they can merely recognize it or refuse to recognize it.