Ron Paul: More guns would deter shootings

Status
Not open for further replies.

TrybalRage

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
317
Location
Marietta, GA
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3556.html

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) has a simple solution to future shooting massacres such as the one that ripped apart Virginia Tech university Monday: more guns.

"People are a little more cautious if somebody might have a gun there," the GOP presidential candidate told Politico reporters Tuesday. "A concealed gun carried by a responsible person -- that might have ended the problem that they had at Virginia Tech with one person being killed or two people being killed."

Paul, 71, is the kind of lawmaker, and presidential candidate, gun control advocates love to hate at moments like this. And, based on public opinion polls and reader feedback at Politico.com, he's far from alone.

Echoing the views of many Americans, he sees calls for restriction on guns as an affront to freedom. The libertarian-minded Texan is one of the most outspoken defenders of gun rights in Congress. Since the obstetrician was first elected to Congress in 1976, he has never voted for a bill restricting gun ownership. And he said the tragedy in Blacksburg, Va., could have been prevented if the school allowed students and professors to carry concealed weapons on campus.

Paul, who ran for the Libertarian presidential nomination in 1988, is well known on Capitol Hill for his outspoken, maverick positions. He opposed authorizing federal funding to victims of Hurricane Katrina. He wants to abolish the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Department of Education. He has called for a return to the gold standard. He argues that tighter gun control laws would have no impact on gun crime.

"It's the lack of access to law-abiding citizens to have guns in many places that increases our crime rate," he said. "We just can't prevent every tragedy of a maniac. So to pretend this happened because of lack of laws would be the wrong thing to assume."

Despite his pro-gun rhetoric, Paul also often finds himself voting with Democrats, particularly in the area of civil liberties. He was one of only three Republican lawmakers to vote against the USA Patriot Act in 2001. He expressed concern that the Virginia Tech shootings would be exploited to crack down on civil liberties.

"I know there will be a call for, 'Boy, we've got to take hold of every single gun and register the gun.' It's sort of like after 9/11, we had to worry about terrorists, but what we've done is register every American," he said. "With national ID cards, inspection and loss of our liberties, warrantless searches, we've attacked law-abiding citizens. So, no, I don't think we need more gun control for law-abiding citizens."

Paul suggested that the Sept. 11 attacks could have been avoided if the pilots on the hijacked airliners had been armed. "If terrorists knew that every pilot had a gun in the cockpit, they wouldn't have done it," he said. "They would have all been shot and wouldn't have accomplished their mission."
 
Interesting...he sounds more Libertarian than Republican. I don't agree with all his stances on issues, but I would vote for him over any of the candidates I've heard of so far.
 
I really don't like the press-release avalanche on both sides, but I guess that's how the newscycle works. Dr. Paul is right though, he's got my vote (he had it before, but whatever).
 
I wish he had cited that DC has the worst gun laws, but more crime than states like Virginia..

Go Ron Go!

Ron 2008! He doesn't "sound" libertarian, he is libertarian :neener: :evil:
 
Interesting...he sounds more Libertarian than Republican. I don't agree with all his stances on issues, but I would vote for him over any of the candidates I've heard of so far.

That's because he IS a Libertarian (big L). He is an odd situation, hes still a member of the Libertarian party but runs as a Republican so he can win within the '2 party system'.

He tows the Libertarian party line almost perfectly.
 
I Love Ron Paul, I have watched him closely ever since he launched his exploratory committee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Q.Would you rob, threaten, or in any way attempt to inflict bodily harm on someone at a gun show, for any reason?

A. Well no, that would be silly.

Q. Why do you think that would be silly, guns and ammunition are very valuable, especially on the black market.

A. Because everyone at a guns show, HAS A GUN. It would be stupid and pointless to try to rob or hurt someone, since everyone has the capability of stopping me at any time. I would wait until that person was by themselfs, and if the person didn't pose a real threat, thats when I would attack.
 
When it comes to politicians in Congress only only Ron Paul stands behind the 2nd A 100%. Every other politician's position (even those generally thought to be pro-gun) is a compromise of some sort.
 
He tows the Libertarian party line almost perfectly.

If that means following the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights, yeah.
Both rare and refreshing.
I'll vote Ron Paul.
 
CAN I GET AN AMEN!!!

he's got my vote.

Sure I don't agree with him on 100% of the issues... but who ever agrees 100% with anyone?
 
AMEN, brothers and sisters!
Dr. Ron Paul is one of the few in Congress who actually supports the entire U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. What a concept, huh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top