How Osama Treats His Brothers

Status
Not open for further replies.

ghschirtz

Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
71
Osama's House of Horrors
By Patrick Poole
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 1, 2007


The same media hacks that brought us countless images of Spc. Lynndie England doing her best John Dillinger imitation with an Iraqi prisoner while covering the Abu Ghraib scandal have suddenly gone mute on the release last week by US military officials of a graphic al-Qaeda torture manual that provides illustrations and instructions on how to use hammers, blow torches and meat cleavers to extract information from their victims in Iraq. This deliberate silence has been occurring as US forces are scouring Iraq looking for two US soldiers who presumably are being subject to the very tortures described in that manual and the body of one of their colleagues was discovered exhibiting signs of that same torture.

The manual was recovered earlier in the month when US soldiers conducted a raid on an al-Qaeda site northeast of Karmah. Freed during the raid were four men and a 13-year old boy – all of whom showed evident signs of torture. According to the military press release, the five individuals said that they had been beaten with chains, cables and hoses by foreign Arab fighters, presumably waging “defensive jihad” against innocent Iraqis. The illustrated torture manual was recovered on a computer found at the location.



But as Noel Sheppard of Newsbusters noted in a short item last week (“Will Media Report Al-Qaeda Torture Manual with Same Zeal as Abu Ghraib?”) and a follow-up post on Friday (“Media Totally Ignore Al-Qaeda Torture Manual”), the media establishment has barely noticed the story even though it features attention-grabbing images even more shocking than the Abu Ghraib abuses. Sheppard asked, “With this in mind, given the media’s fascination with what American soldiers were doing at Abu Ghraib, is it safe to assume that the same level of attention will be given to what our enemy is doing? Or, would that be too much like journalism?”



To their credit, CNN made a brief mentioned of the discovery of the torture manual and the release of the Al-Qaeda captives in a May 23rd segment on “The Situation Room”. That was followed on Friday by a short article on the Fox News website, which was subsequently noticed by Gary Carney at the USA Today blog. CNN elaborated on the story again over the weekend, reporting that 42 al-Qaeda torture victims had been freed by US troops. But a search of the websites of the three major TV networks – ABC, CBS and NBC – as well as the major daily national newspapers – the New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune and the LA Times – finds not a single mention of the al-Qaeda torture manual.



Notwithstanding the slight coverage of this story by CNN, Fox News and USA Today, virtually every element surrounding this story is an indictment on the increasingly irrelevant Fourth Estate. The public was first made aware of this story and given access to the cartoon images of the torture manual by The Smoking Gun. That report was then linked to by the nemesis of the old media, the Drudge Report, and then picked up by most of the major conservative blogs and publications. But virtually no one would have known the story existed if we had to rely on the media establishment.



This raises an important question: what stories did the American people miss during the decades-long media establishment hegemony and how would our country have responded if it had been fully informed? There may be no way of every knowing.



The media establishment can’t claim ignorance about this story. The May 21st military press release that first made this information available was published by the Combined Press Information Center in the Baghdad Green Zone, where virtually all Iraq-based US journalists operate out of. And the issue of the torture manual was raised during a well-attended Pentagon press conference last Thursday with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Peter Pace. Only one question was asked about the subject, however, with no subsequent follow-up (the transcript doesn’t indicate which journalist asked the question).



The indictment over the silence on this story doesn’t stop just at the US media establishment. As details slowly leaked out last week, the Center for Public Integrity, which promotes itself as “Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest”, published an article last week by Michael Bilton of the “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists” entitled, “US Treatment of Detainees Deplored”, where he expresses such outrages as the waterboarding of al-Qaeda operations chief, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, and revisiting the Abu Ghraib scandal.



A check of the Amnesty International website directory for Iraq also finds no mention whatsoever of al-Qaeda’s torture networks and methods. But a report from last year, “Beyond Abu Ghraib,” identifies the primary culprit of torture and abuse in Iraq – the US armed forces: “As Amnesty International has reported elsewhere, many of the abuses occurring today are committed by armed groups opposed to the US-led Multinational Force (MNF) and the Iraqi government that it underpins.”



The foreign press has also joined the conspiracy of silence on the al-Qaeda torture story. Two weeks ago, the BBC published a hand-wringing article, “US detainee mentally tortured”, about the horrors described by Majid Khan, an al-Qaeda operative imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay who was planning to conduct terrorist operations inside the US.



And what exactly were the horrible conditions and “mental tortures” that Mr. Khan was subject to? I’ll let the Beeb tell you:



Mr Khan complained about how US guards had taken away pictures of his daughter, given him new glasses with the wrong prescription, shaved his beard off, forcibly fed him when he went on hunger strike, and denied him the opportunity for recreation.



This led him to attempt to chew through his artery twice, Mr Khan said.



Later, Mr Khan produced a list of further examples of psychological torture, which included the provision of "cheap, branded, unscented soap", the prison newsletter, noisy fans and half-inflated balls in the recreation room that "hardly bounce".



Unscented soap and half-inflated basketballs. Oh, the humanity! Someone call John Murtha! But gouging out eyeballs, drilling into skulls and blow torches applied directly to human skin by Mr. Khan’s al-Qaeda associates have thus far been too unimportant for the BBC to mention.



The events over the past week surrounding this story are indicative of why so many Americans are turning to alternative news outlets for reporting and commentary and why media establishment newsrooms are slashing staff to cut costs. But rather than cover the real important stories, such as the grotesque examples of the craven depravity of our sworn terrorist enemies, the Fourth Estate feels compelled to stick to their ideology and political bias than adjust to the information age – all while the truly independent and investigative media runs circles around them.



The silence of the lame continues.
 
The same media hacks that brought us countless images of Spc. Lynndie England doing her best John Dillinger imitation with an Iraqi prisoner while covering the Abu Ghraib scandal have suddenly gone mute on the release last week by US military officials of a graphic al-Qaeda torture manual that provides illustrations and instructions on how to use hammers, blow torches and meat cleavers to extract information from their victims in Iraq.

This is a variation on a right-wing theme repeated so often I wonder if it's a talking point handed out somewhere. "X gets media attention but Y doesn't, even though they're vaguely similar!" - an equation that makes the wingnuts appear hellbent on drawing an equivalency between the US, the US military and its actions - and those of al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda is expected to do evil ****. That's kind of the concept behind their operation - you might have noticed. It is not news when evil people do evil things.

Abu Ghraib is news because America, and by extension its military, readily and cheerfully lays claim to a moral high ground in matters of 'terror' and 'war' and 'due process.'
 
(I posted an irritating variant on a political candidate's name, so Don Gwinn deleted my post.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are supposed to be the good guys!
That’s why we get a lot of unwanted attention when we do bad things.

~G. Fink
 
Mainstream media is all over the anti-war movement, I don't watch TV news of any type, and I see it. Radio news, newspaper sites, etc. will always have some sort of war nay-sayer saying it's time to get out. Reporting items such as this give credibility to why our soldiers are there, and we just can't have that, nope, wouldn't be prudent.
 
Because this is not a biased newssource it must be trustworthy.:rolleyes:

I am sorry but George W. Bush and the people he has torturing people are terrorists. The soldiers who did those things at Abu Ghairib are terrorists.

Yes the mainstream media is completely against the war but that is because the majority of the country is against the war. They are in the business of selling papers.

This paper is marketed to right wing neo-cons and that is who will buy it so the bias is obvious to everyone else. There are far left papers who cater to the far left. Imagine that!

So the bad guys are torturing our people? We are torturing people who have nothing to do with terrorism and have destroyed their country but lets pretend that those facts are irrelevant. Lets forget about the 600,000 dead people at the hands of the United States and just focus on what they are doing. Lets forget that we invaded their country and intend to force our views down their throat because they are bad and they hate us because we dont like their views. They hate our freedoms! Yeah thats it...:rolleyes:

When we torture them is it wrong for them to torture us. I believe John McCain suggested that if we can torture people then the enemy can torture our guys. Why is it the Neo-Cons cant understand that sometimes the US is wrong?
 
We are supposed to be the good guys!
That’s why we get a lot of unwanted attention when we do bad things.

Yes, absolutely. Likewise, we are the good guys, and they are the bad guys, and the media should be at least making note of this fact by saying, "yeah, we screwed up - once. but look what they do routinely, for fun - with no apparent purpose but to torture and hurt."

They say that they can't do that - it's "propaganda" - but in excluding this story - denying it the same journalistic weight - they tell lies through omission. "We do X in one such situation, and they do Y in the same; see, we are superior." And THAT is the problem. They are either so relativistic or filled with hatred for America that they can not defend their own positions.
 
Hey remember that story about a country that was flying prisoners to all these remote locations across the world and torturing them to extract information? That was really bad. I seem to forget the name of the country though. They must have been pretty evil, since we're the good guys and we don't do stuff like that except in isolated incidents by low-level soldiers in combat zones.
 
When we torture them is it wrong for them to torture us. I believe John McCain suggested that if we can torture people then the enemy can torture our guys. Why is it the Neo-Cons cant understand that sometimes the US is wrong?
I can't speak for anyone else, but if the worst tortures inflicted on "us" (meaning U.S. and coalition military personnel, civilian contractors, and freedom-loving private citizens) were waterboarding and hair-shaving, I'd have a little more sympathy for your argument.

Yes, worse things have been done by U.S. military personnel. The difference is that when it comes out that a guard at Abu Ghraib was pictured with a prisoner on a leash, she is court-martialed. On the other hand, the above-referenced torture manual explicitly condones the grossest of physical tortures leading to maiming and death.

Please stop trying to suggest a moral equivalence between us and them.
 
Please stop trying to suggest a moral equivalence between us and them.

"We're the good guys and they're the bad guys" is moral equivalence? What does moral equivalence mean in your world?

I love this. When the media report on Al Qaeda doing bad things like car bombings, they're liberal because they're trying to show how bad the situation is. When the media don't report that Al Qaeda has a manual on doing bad things, they're liberal because they're trying to cover up that Al Qaeda's bad.

I suppose that regardless of what happens, you can twist it into supporting your beliefs.
 
I think the gist of the article is "wheres the outrage"

you couldn't get away from the pictures of the guy on a soap box in a hood with the electrical things on his fingers. or the underwear on the head, or the dog barking.

Our guys go through worse during training!!!

Day in and out for months we were told of the "brutality" of freelance torture ...
The Al guys do far worse and it is their official policy and it gets 1 minute of air time compared to hours for underwearhead.

It's the Same with Jesse "hymie town" Jackson his guy threatens to "snuff out"
a store owner and it does not get any play.

What would have happened if some R candidate had an aid say to "snuff out" Jackson.
 
Most military folks, especially veterans can probably vouch for the fact that war is hell. It should be fairly well known that Al-Queda and most other third world terrorist, political, and military organizations do not have the same high standards for treatment of POW's and do not follow the same interrogation teqniques that we use. The so called "torture" that the US uses is effective without the permanent injuries or death that the sharp/blunt and hot/cold methods other countries use. To civilians, who know all they do about the military though news papers and movies, just about anything that actually occurs in basic would be seen as horrible, possibly leading to a movement to force those mean old Seargents to stop the yelling, the smacking, the insults, and the most demanding of the training, unfortunately that would probably cost the lives of thousands of americans whose greatest weapon is the training itself. War itself is a cruel practice, the US is very reserved in the tactics used, the ROE and most other aspects of battle, but right now The enemies of America would like you to belive otherwise because it sells papers and boosts ratings to show the faults of the greatest Military in the world. If you do not belive that America's Military are the good guys then you are entitled to your opinion, and I would encourage you to go and live with those who you consider the good guys.
 
Wait a second! Al-Queda is EVIL, really EVIL. You don't say. I'm shocked, really shocked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top