Posting the full article...

Do you consider this a legitimate concern?


  • Total voters
    17
Status
Not open for further replies.

Caimlas

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
1,689
Location
SD
I have noticed that it is not only common for people to post the full article when linking to one, but also for people to jump on those who do not do so and then do so themselves. This concerns me.

It is my understanding that copyright laws - predating any of the newer DMCA and similar nonsense - make this an illegality. It's copyright infringement. This is why groups like Routers and the AP can survive by charging news agencies for articles - instead of having the articles copied after 1st releast without fee - and why Google News does not include complete articles inline, just a blurp.

And yes, I'll admit that it has happened on occasion on my forums, but I typically try and limit or re-edit the items to prevent such abuse. THR, being (as I understand it) a community site, is not even a "news site". In short, if people want to read the whole article instead of the blurb the original poster believes to be pertinent, they should just click the freakin' link and read the whole article. (Really short articles/blurbs withstanding, I imagine.) It's their creative work, after all.

I think it is important that we, as 2nd Amendment proponents, attempt to honor the rights of other people with regard to intellectual property.

That is all.
 
I would consider a concern, it the news sources said it was. For now, I'll assume it is not. Sleeping dogs, etc.
 
It's rude.

Who wants to read 3 pages of text in a forum, especially when it's laid out badly?

Quote relevant parts, and link to the whole thing.

Copyright isn't the first concern.
 
I choose what I deem to be the relevant quotes, and link to the source. AFAIK, as long as you give credit, there's no actuall copyright violation. If a person was to re-post a story as his own original work there would be trouble. If a person was to charge for access to the story, but didn't subscribe to the news source, like AP, or UPI (and pay whatever fees are appropriate) I believe there would be reeason for the original publisher to get upset.
 
Unless use of the work is covered under "fair use", it's copyright infringement, even if due credit is given.

I can't recall where I saw this, but I believe if a story published online has an "email this story" link, or something similar, it is legal to post it to forums and the like. If not, it isn't.
Course, IANAL.

I imagine Oleg is somewhat of an expert considering his experience with copyright law, perhaps he could weigh in on the topic.
 
Sometimes linked articles disappear, and pasting the text in the forum keeps the thread going after the linked article disappears... Quite common actually. It's more of a thread etiquette thing.
 
A serious copyright violation would be if you charged others
for the use of the material you copied.

Full, direct quotes giving full credit to the original source
is not depriving the original source of any income that would
normally be associated with the material, and is actually
giving the author a wider audience and performing a free
archiving function. (Yes I sound funny with my tongue in cheek.)
 
I always post a link and copy the entire article (for archival purposes).

Many news sites give an option to print or to email the article to a friend. I don't see how this is different.
 
Post the link. Post the whole article, but then edit out the "usual stuff" that doesn't really pertain to the point the thread starter wants to make.

Make sure it's obvious as to the source, and all that.

For those who worry, this is a freebie website; no money. And many papers do allow emailing the whole article, so I'm not all that concerned about copyright. They want the widest possible dissemination to the widest possible audience.

And this is off topic...

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top