JJpdxpinkpistols
Member
Please let me outline the scope of my question, then I'll get into the specifics.
This thread is NOT:
-for bashing of the cops/army/private security involved. We know they were doing their job, regardless of our opinion of it.
-for railing against any political party. Not in the scope of my inquiry.
Yesterday, my wife asked me about the confiscations, and I didn't have an answer:
HOW did they find out that the people had firearms? Was there a check of the BATF records?
Did they cite legal precedence when doing so? *IS* there any sort of legal precedence?
Did they present warrants? How thorough were their searches of the homes. Did guns that were buried/hid in unconventional locations make it through the confiscations? i.e. was the examination cursory, or a "tossing" of the residence?
Lastly: I am quite curious just HOW they managed to get folks that were present when the various groups of law enforcement arrived, to admit to the authorities that they had firearms.
Tho not strictly legal in nature, this question is quite tied into the legal aspects of the subject at hand. Specifically, the questions about the BATF records lead me to pause.
This thread is NOT:
-for bashing of the cops/army/private security involved. We know they were doing their job, regardless of our opinion of it.
-for railing against any political party. Not in the scope of my inquiry.
Yesterday, my wife asked me about the confiscations, and I didn't have an answer:
HOW did they find out that the people had firearms? Was there a check of the BATF records?
Did they cite legal precedence when doing so? *IS* there any sort of legal precedence?
Did they present warrants? How thorough were their searches of the homes. Did guns that were buried/hid in unconventional locations make it through the confiscations? i.e. was the examination cursory, or a "tossing" of the residence?
Lastly: I am quite curious just HOW they managed to get folks that were present when the various groups of law enforcement arrived, to admit to the authorities that they had firearms.
Tho not strictly legal in nature, this question is quite tied into the legal aspects of the subject at hand. Specifically, the questions about the BATF records lead me to pause.