My Friend's (rounda)bout with NICS

Status
Not open for further replies.

rdhood

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
943
A while back, I posted a problem that my friend was having buying his first gun. Below is a synopsis of the events that took place. I have removed names, places to prevent him from being identified......


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


On or about April 15, 2007, I purchased a gun from a seller on Gunbroker. I had it shipped to an FFL in Somewhereville, GA. It arrived some 10 days later. I immediately went to the FFL, filled out a 4473, and waited. 10 minutes later, the owner of store comes back and says, “It was DENIED”. I was dumbfounded! I had never done anything wrong that would prevent me from owning a handgun. I had never spent a night in jail. I knew that it must be a mistake! The FFL/store owner told me that I could leave the gun with him, and that he would hold it until this matter was resolved. He also offered to sell it for me should I decide to go that route. It was clear, though, that the minute the “DENIED” came across the telephone that he believed me to be guilty… that I was a crook. He did not say so directly, but in a round about way, “I’ve never known anyone to get a denial overturned. Generally, if the person gives a Social Security number on the application, there is little chance of mistaken identity.”

He gave me the NTN (denial) number and a pamphlet describing the appeal procedure. In reading the procedure, it all seemed on the up-and-up. They make it appear that your appeal will be handled in a timely manner, so I was hopeful that in a few short weeks this would all be cleared up and I would be allowed to take possession of my gun. One can hope….

I immediately created a letter to the FBI/NICS to state that I had done no wrong, that I was a law abiding citizen, that did NOT have one of the disqualifiers for owning a firearm. To their credit, they followed the letter of the law and acknowledged my appeal within 5 days. THIS IS THE ONLY LEGALLY MANDATED TIMEFRAME THAT THEY HAVE TO MEET DURING THE APPEAL PROCESS…. TO SEND AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER WITHIN 5 DAYS. The acknowledgement letter included a demand for fingerprints, which cost me $20 to obtain at my local PD. Folks, that is $20 more… on top of the FFL fee… that this citizen had to fork over because of NICS.

Then, I proceeded to wait.. and wait. During the wait, I considered what might be the case… maybe SCUBA diving on Buford Dam, which resulted in a trespass ticket, somehow triggered this? Maybe my wife filed a restraint order against me during our divorce that I did not know about? In any case, I knew it must be a mistake. I had never done anything wrong that even remotely set off a disqualifier. To that end, I decided that I was going to get a gun anyway. In the following months, I purchased the following guns: a .40 S&W handgun, a .22lr rifle, an AK-47 rifle, and an SKS rifle. If anything, this taught me that the NICS system does not work. It prevented a law abiding citizen from getting a handgun, but did not stop that same citizen from purchasing firearms in FTF sales. I started reloading, put about 1000 rounds through my handgun, several hundred through the SKS/Aks, and another thousand through the 22lr.

I waited into June… then July… then August. By this time, I was getting mad. I called my Senator’s office, Saxby Chambliss. His office requested the information that I had sent to the FBI, and a signed statement that said that they could inquire on my behalf. After giving them background on the case and the signed statement, it took about a week before I received a reply from NICS.

This time, the NICS letter said that I was, in fact, the person that was disqualified. They included a printout from the Georgia Crime Information Center (GCIC) and the reporting agency , the SmallTown Police Department. In examining this information, I determined that my record showed that I was a convicted DRUG FELON, and had been for some 24 years! Now, mind you, I had an arrest in SmallTown in 1983. I paid a $33 fine in SmallTown Municiple Court. This was all in my record. As it turns out, either the Smalltown PD, the municipal court, or the GCIC hamfisted the data input and input a code for a drug Felony. Everyone blamed everyone else. One thing was clear, though, is that the reporting agency was listed as the SmallTown PD, and they were the agency that had to issue a letter to correct it.

Anyway, I was now at 4 months into my appeal, and JUST finding out exactly why I was denied. I strongly believe that if it had not been for the actions of Senator Chambliss, I most certainly would still be waiting for a reply from the FBI. You see, the FBI makes it clear that their only time constraint is to acknowledge your appeal in 5 days. After that, they can take as long as they want to “research” your case. It is quite apparent to me that they spent all of 5 minutes researching my case in 4 months of waiting. At least I finally knew what the problem was and where to go to start fixing it.

The next day, I got on the GCIC website to view their records correction procedures. They needed a statement from the reporting agency on reporting agency letterhead in order to correct an error on the GCIC database. The FBI needed a similar statement to correct the FBI database, but warned that the GCIC database would need to be corrected before they rechecked it, as all reporting agencies would have to be clean before they would clear a gun purchase. My next stop/phone call was to the records department at the SmallTown PD. Fortunately, I talked to a very nice clerk who had been in the office for 25 years. She stated plainly that they no longer keep records from that time period. They were not computerized at the time. When they went to computers, they entered in all of their paper records into the computer and shredded them. So, they had no proof (or disproof) that I had ever been through their PD or municipal court system. Second lesson learned: the law abiding citizen has to somehow prove his innocence, and that might not even be possible. They have no proof that you did anything other than having taken your fingerprints, and a 25 year old record in a computer. You have no proof that you didn’t do anything. How could you prove that you did not do what they said you did 25 years ago? Well, in this case the proof was in the record itself. Had my crime been a drug felon, it would not have been handled in municipal court, the fine would have been much greater than $33, and I would have spent time in prison. Since none of these was true, my record contradicted itself. It was an obvious mistake, BUT the clerk said that this was an error by the municipal court and that I would have to talk to them. So I did. They were just as nice, but said that the error was by the PD/jail, so they would have to fix it. Finally, I got the PD and the Municiple court clerks together for a discussion. While they all agreed that it appeared to be a mistake, they were reluctant to fix it as they would have to change a felony to a misdemeanor. They did not want to do anything, except that they were reminded of the section of the Georgia code that allows me to sue them (the PD and the municipal court), and if successful, to get my record changed AND reimbursement for my legal fees. Frankly, I did not have the money to mount a legal challenge. If I could not coerce them to change my record, I would have to remain a felon. I asked if I could have an appointment to speak with the Chief of Police of SmallTown PD. Since it was his office that would have to issue the correction letter, it was he who was going to make this easy or hard on me. The PD records clerk clearly did not want this to happen (me to meet with the chief), so she said that she would meet with him on this matter and see what could be done. Several days later, after they had met on this matter, the Chief had decided that it was a mistake, and had a letter drawn up and sent to the GCIC. At my request, I had a copy of that letter signed and forwarded to me.

After getting the letter in hand, I called the FBI. They were pretty much as rude as they could be. You see, the FBI will take original erroneous records from reporting agencies, but they have no way of automatically amending a record that was amended at the state level. So, the state can get you automatically and erroneously labeled a felon by the FBI, but you have to get your FBI record corrected yourself. How nice. A local agency bungles your record, and leaves you to deal with the FBI by yourself to clean it up. That, and they recheck your state record (GCIC). So the GCIC has to be cleaned up BEFORE the FBI rechecks your record BUT they won’t automatically sync your record with the cleaned up state record. Thus, you have to hope that the GCIC does their thing in a timely manner so that it is reporting correctly before the FBI re-checks your record.

So, before forwarding to the FBI, I had a talk with the Georgia Crime Information Center. These people were also as rude as they could be. When I inquired how long it would take to update my record, they stated 4 months. I was incredulous. They ham-fist my record, turn me into a felon, and then declare that it will take 4 months for them to fix their mistake. “Sir, we have over 20,000 requests for changes.” I had several replies to that: “If those requests are for people who are INNOCENT of the mistakes that GCIC have made, don’t you think you have a responsibility to get it done faster than 4 months? And since you are propagating this erroneous information around the country and into the FBI database, don’t you think that you have a responsibility to propagate CORRECT information to those agencies and databases? If I get stopped tomorrow, I will be treated as a recidivist FELON while the letter that proves my innocence sits on YOUR desk? Further, what if I have to get a new job? How will I answer the “have you ever been convicted of a felony” when your database shows that I am a felon? When I filled out my son’s Boy Scout troop’s permission to do a background check last night, I answered “NO” to the felony question. What are they going to find when they inquire in the GCIC database? Finally, this is my 2nd Amendment right we are talking about. You took it away. Are you saying that you do not have the resources to restore a person’s constitutional right in a timely manner for a mistake that the GCIC made? And if you can’t do it in a timely manner, than NICS can’t do it in a timely manner, and that defeats the purpose of NICS, doesn’t it? Shall I write to my state and national senators and demonstrate to them that NICS is not the timely golden process they claim it to be because the State of Georgia cannot keep it’s commitment to update NICS in a timely manner?” He was truly P.O.’ed at this point, but I had made myself clear. I then asked, “how can I check to see that the changes were made”? He replies, “You can get a copy of your record for $20 plus a fingerprint card (another $20).”. To that I replied, “You mean I am going to have to spend $40 MORE dollars to make sure that you have corrected a problem that your agency made in the first place?” Anyway, I got to him. He said that he would do what he could to speed up the process. I could only take him at his word and that fact that I had his name and would make it known to everyone involved that GCIC had failed to meet their commitment to report information in a timely manner to the FBI/NICS database. But this goes to another point: funding. If your state doesn’t fund the accurate and timely updating of erroneous information, then your 2A rights can be infringed long after you have proven your innocence.

So, I could tell that the guy was going to try to bump my record and get the changes made sooner than later. We are now in mid-September, 4.5 months after my denial and 4 months after the acknowledgment of the appeal. I went ahead and sent the PD’s letter stating that I am not a felon and requesting that all databases containing the erroneous information be changed to the FBI, along with a letter that repeated my assertion of the right to own a firearm and the respectful request that my rights be IMMEDIATELY restored, and that I be allowed to take possession of the gun for which I was denied. I waited. A week later, they sent an acknowledgement of my letter. Three weeks later (October 22, 2007), they sent a letter and certificate indicating that the denial had been overturned , and that I could take possession of the gun. I immediately went to the FFL and picked up my weapon. His wife was there, pulled out my gun, and followed the instructions on the certificate. Everything went through, and the gun was mine. She stated that it was the FIRST time that they had ever seen an overturned denial. I won’t forget that they treated me like a criminal when the denial originally came through.

All in all, it took nearly 6 months start-to-finish to appeal the NICS denial that resulted from a simple clerical error. This process would have been much more difficult if not for two reasons: 1) my record was obviously erroneous. Any fool could see it. But that wasn’t enough to get action. 2) Georgia has a code section that allows the individual to sue the state/reporting agency to have gun rights restored, and that the state/reporting agency will pay the legal fees for a successful restoration. I am convinced that this potential financial obligation on part of the SmallTown PD influenced their decision to work with me. The same goes for the GCIC. They knew that I could sue them for the change, and expose their rudeness and unwillingness to expedite the restoration of my constitutional rights. They didn’t know I didn’t have the money to pursue this, but the threat that I might was enough to make them do the right thing. Had this been an error which did not result in a denial of my 2A rights, I would have had to mount a legal challenge with my own funds to get it changed.

Overall, I was pleasant and willing to work with folks who would see the obvious injustice that had been committed, and expedite the correction of those errors. I was belligerent with agencies who (first) treated me like a criminal and wanted to drag their feet. Nonetheless, it took almost 6 months to appeal a NICS denial for an obvious error committed at the local level.

Folks, this is not justice. What part of “shall not be infringed” was followed in the taking my rights? During the process, I have read THR. I have looked at the polls that show 65% of you think that NICS is a good thing, and (despite being “the high road”) I have developed a heck-of-a-lot of contempt for that 65% who were willing and eager to allow infringement on my gun rights in order to keep theirs. And, yes, 65% of you are willing to infringe on the gun rights of 30,000 people YEARLY (like me) who are able to successfully mount a legal challenge to their denial. There is no excuse for that attitude. Your willingness to go along with the system and be happy about it signals the eventual end to your own gun rights. As for me, I will vehemently oppose any and all efforts to expand NICS , and demand that they increase the timeliness of their investigations. My case should have been resolved in three weeks… not 6 months.

NICS is not a good thing. As long as a $12 an hour clerk has the ability to affect the gun rights of law abiding citizens (without an expedited and timely restoration process for those rights), NICS does not work. As long as those who are responsible for the update of State and Federal databases can’t do so in a timely manner, NICS does not work. As long as a person who has been denied by NICS can go out and get a gun FTF, NICS does not work. As long as law abiding citizens have to prove their innocence for something found in a database… for which there are no records or evidence other than the database entry… NICS does not work. As long as the law abiding citizen has to front the money necessary to mount a legal challenge to an erroneous record found in the GCIC or FBI database, NICS does not work. Law abiding citizens should not have to jump through hoops at all levels of government to correct an error made by government.

To the 35% that see NICS as a total failure, more power to you. You see the truth in this government lie. People will deride you with jokes of tin-foil hats, but I now know from personal experience that you are the folks that have a grasp on reality. In the recent debates about “mental health” qualifications for possessing a gun, one rather prolific THR poster extols the virtues of the right to appeal. When I look at what I went through to get a simple mistake corrected, I KNOW what a load of BS that argument is. I am sure that he states it in all sincerity. But until he… and the other 65% on THR… actually have to go through the appeal process, please do no bore us with arguments that NICS is not an infringement on the 2nd because one can appeal for the restoration of rights. You speak from ignorance.

Besides buying a gun, how else has this affected me? Looking back, it appears to have cost me several jobs. Several jobs were offered, and then rescinded after the background check. I never checked my own background because I suspected nothing. The job offers were always, “they have decided not to hire anybody at this time”, … AFTER they offered the job. I think now that the FBI and GCIC databases prevented me from getting those jobs. I had no idea that I was listed as a felon. Why would I?

If I can help it, I will never again fill out a 4473. I will never again go through an FFL to get the (incompetent) government’s permission to purchase or possess a gun.
 
Sounds like your friend should talk to a lawyer... if the job offer cancellations are documented, I imagine he could file suit against the PD that made the original mistake (if he is interested).
 
Been there. Done that. I was denied also because of a court clerical mistake that afer the NICS appeal I had to jump through hoops to get the court to correct. After months I finally got a judge to sign an order that it was indeed a mistake by the court. After receiving this the FBI finally cleared me. BTW, everyone I ever spoke to at the FBI office in WV was very courteous and willing to help.
 
Now you are illustrating EXACTLY what I was getting at with my question of two weeks ago. "How would a person know if they were on the NICS "prohibited possessor list?" The system does not work because it is designed to be a one-way system. Info in and nothing out.
 
they sent a letter and certificate indicating that the denial had been overturned , and that I could take possession of the gun.

At best, this is all you get from the administrative appeal process, and the time involved is typical. Expect half a year or more to be eaten up in the wait, even in clear cut cases.

They do NOT alter the permanent record and they do NOT promise that it won't keep happening. Generally what will happen is they place a flag on the record noting the appeal so that if someone sees the apparent felony again they'll delay you while that gets kicked upstairs and investigated.

Hopefully in this case the original error has been corrected, but who knows if that will help.
 
1983 USC deals specifically with "denying rights under COLOR OF LAW"......it provides both criminal and civil redress for an aggreved person.

You friend should have scratched up the cash to lawyer up. At the least it'd have been worth a call to the NRA to see if you might be routed to an attorney...perhaps even one who'd take the case pro-bono.

My personal belief is (speaking now as a retired CLEO) that liability rests mostly on the back of the municipality.....That Chief knew that and thats why that letter got written. I would also strongly suggest that the person should've ignored the clerks denial of a meeting with that Chief and scheduled one himself.

In my personal experience of some 15 years as a CLEO and 33 in the field, I will tell you with no hesitation that that clerk was trying to cover his/her ass! What I'd suggest your friend do is to bill that municipality for the funds he had to spend to rectify the problem...and add in that billing that "he really doesn't want to find it necessary to secure legal assistance"......Believe me, you WILL get a reply.

I'd add that if pursued with a capable attorney and good investigator you might just find that job losses such as described might turn out to be a "gold mine" for your friend. That is no small matter, but an awful lot depends on how promptly you attack the issue when you discover the damage......It takes a lawyer to do it and it just might be well worth your buddy's while to kick a few bucks to one and see if the case interests him....some lawyers'l like other folks are lazy, but if you find a hungry one........well.........I'd try it!
 
One question-

Any chance pour buddy tried to vote in the last 20 or so years?

A couple lessons learned-

1) Civil service employees work for us. Sometimes, they need to be reminded.

2) Maybe we should be willing to pay a penny or two more in taxes to get competent and reasonable resources to correct similar snafus.

3) Glad I never got busted back when I was reckless youth:D Stuff catches up with you and your buddy paid for his indiscretion for years. Yikes.
 
But this goes to another point: funding. If your state doesn’t fund the accurate and timely updating of erroneous information, then your 2A rights can be infringed long after you have proven your innocence.

Like say additional federal funds from H.R. 2640?

I think it is an absolute outrage that he had to go through all of that to get his record cleared. At the same time though, we don't really have the votes to make a lot of dramatic revisions (reversals) to the NICS system right now - so do we accept the extra funding and appeals process that comes with H.R. 2640 knowing that more records will be added to NICS or do we stick with what we have now and hope it doesn't get worse?

Because until we put more pro-RKBA people in the Congress, those are our choices.
 
All in all, it took nearly 6 months start-to-finish to appeal the NICS denial that resulted from a simple clerical error.
Stuff like this should keep us all up at night. Much like the Penn. temporary shutdown of background checks, it's incredulous that such nonsense will deny or severely deprive us of our rights.
 
Rdhood Your story is exactly what concerns me about my son's situation. He has never had anything worse than a parking ticket, but somehow landed on the terrorist watch list. He found out when he was flying to a Bowl game with the WSU marching band. He got delayed on every leg of the flight. He has firearms that I have given him, but has never purchased a gun from an FFL.

See if you can get Saxby Chambliss to read your letter on the Senate floor when this comes up for debate. You were clearly guilty until proven innocent. :cuss:
 
I read a SF story (don't remember the title or author) about a man who checked out a murder mystery from a library. Then he was overdue returning the book (or something like that) and somehow the monolithic computer system had him flagged as the murderer from the book. They arrested him and were going to execute him for a "murder" that occurred in a fictional story!

Sadly, I believe that is exactly where this country is headed.

Oh, and count me among the 35% ;)
 
On the bright side, glad your buddy got this cleared up on his time. The alternative would be a traffic stop, finding he's a drug felon, finding firearms in his car, tearing his car apart looking for things, and sitting in jail.
 
"I have developed a heck-of-a-lot of contempt for that 65% who were willing and eager to allow infringement on my gun rights in order to keep theirs."

Oh, like the 65% is responsible for some stupid error that was made years ago. Givemeabreak.

John
 
Been there done that except I was only required to submit fingerprints to FBI in West Virginia twice. Since that time I got my NY CCW. EVERY gun I purchase results in a denial that the NICS check fixes within 24 hours. Yea, it's a pain in the butt, but I can't stand the thought of tracking down the error somewhere in the system. Besides, I never need a firearm that bad. As long as the seller holds it until the check comes through I am satisfied.
 
Then again, if he hadn't done dope, misdemeanor or felony, all this would never have happened. If he hadn't made the first mistake, it wouldn't have been there to be compounded by bureaucrats.
 
THIS story is exactly why I go to my local PD office once a year and request a criminal background check on MYSELF. Sure, it costs a few bucks and I've never seen anything other than "no criminal records located" but it makes me feel better that waiting and wondering.......
 
ChestyP

That is not the point, a clerical error resulted in a denial of rights. That is the problem here.
 
Oh, like the 65% is responsible for some stupid error that was made years ago. Givemeabreak.
No - they're willing to act like NICS is a good idea, so long as it doesn't impede THEIR ability to exercise their gun rights. By supporting the notion that somehow NICS keeps guns from the wrong hands, they allow the .gov to deny the right to legally own a firearm to anyone they choose.

The OP's friend is referring to this thread, in which two thirds of THR respondants voted in favor of NICS checks. The thread is well worth the read; I've included an edited section below to make sure that the basic facts aren't lost on this thread:

================================

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/bcft05.txt

* 1.6% of the 8.3 million applications for firearm transfers or permits in 2005 were rejected by the FBI (66,700 applications)or State and local agencies(65,200 applications).

* The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearm and Explosive's(ATF) field offices investigated 9,575 National Instant Criminal Background Check System(NICS)denials that were referred by the FBI in 2005.

* In 2005 U.S. attorney offices accepted for prosecution 135 NICS denial cases investigated by ATF.
So - 130,000 folks were denied legal access to a firearm via NICS denial in 2005, of which sixty seven thousand purchases were blocked by the FBI. Of those sixty seven thousand FBI-blocked transactions, less than ten thousand represented denials that were worthy of ATFE investigation, and only 135 denials actually represented cases suitable for Federal prosecution.

161,000 appeals of denials from 1999 to 2005; 57,000 reversed
This means that almost TEN THOUSAND folk were inappropriately denied the right to purchase a firearm in 2005 (presuming the reversal rate trends flat from year to year), and all for the result of one hundred and thirty five Bad Guys getting prosecuted.

More importantly - if 67,000 denials were issued by the FBI in 2005 (the last year for official .gov statistics) and almost 10,000 were demonstrably inappropriate - that's a pretty sobering ratio. Even factoring in the state denials, the NICS system by their own numbers erroneously denys the right to buy a firearm to someone who was legally empowered to do so for at least eight percent of the denials.

How much more of this are y'all willing to take? Just so long as it's not you?

Gimmeabreak, backatchya.
 
That is not the point a clerical error resulted in a denial of rights. That is the problem here.

Nope, that's a symptom of more than one problem.

The big problem is government red tape, over stepping, screwing up, etc.

The small problem is rdhood's buddy got busted for doing something dumb.

If you do a root cause analysis, the dope smokin' (long haired hippe freak?:neener:?:cool:) buddy would not have been in a position to get his rights scambled if he wasn't intent on getting his brain scrambled.

I feel for the guy, but bad things happen to good people who do stupid things. If you want to reduce the number of bad things in your life, don't do stupid things.

Someone here has a cute tag line. Goes something like this-

"Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid"

so true.....
 
Guess what...

I happen to be a police dispatcher that works with NCIC daily.
What makes this story even sadder is that there are 8 states, the last time I checked, that aren't even linked to the III FBI files. In other words, someone in Louisianna can kill 5 people and rob a couple of banks and drive over to Texas and buy a gun with no problem because his NCIC would be clear. Some agencies are not yet computerized, which is hard to believe, and there are so many records that cannot be computerized because they have no good fingerprints. Fingerprints are the first thing entered, with numbers being assigned to patterns, etc. There is a flag that can be added to a name and date of birth in this instance prompting you to request a "manual check" and may be a week before you get a reply. This is not done to my knowledge when a check is done for gun purchases. Add to these facts the records such as this gentleman's record that are entered incorrectly, and you have one big failure.
 
This is why I am buying more and more cap-n-ball pistols.
They may be slow to reload.
They may lack the power of modern weapons.
However, they will work on BGs, and I don't have to put up with the NICS crap.
 
someone in Louisianna can kill 5 people and rob a couple of banks and drive over to Texas and buy a gun with no problem because his NCIC would be clear
Not without potentially getting a few other folk to break a law or two in the process. More importantly - do you think for an instant that a NICS check would PREVENT this same individual from buying a weapon somewhere and/or being a danger to the community?

No.

And THAT is why NICS checks are a failure.
 
I dont know how long ago this happened but congratulations on gettiong it fixed.

Now you should make several copies of all documents involved and write a nice cover letter and forward to US Senators and reps AND your state elected officials including the Atorney Gen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top