Ex marine kicks butt

Status
Not open for further replies.

bps3040

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
144
Location
Spring, Texas
He showed these punks,lol. Just received this from USCCA news letter

THEY PICKED THE WRONG DUDE TO ROB!
found at: biblicalevangelist.org and written by: Dr. Robert L. Sumner

Recently a couple of masked thugs - Donicio Arrindell, age 22, and Frederick Gadson, age 21 - decided to rob a Subway Sandwich Shop in Plantation (FL), a little town of about 5,000 due west of Fort Lauderdale, just off I-595. It looked like a safe time, shortly before midnight and only one patron was dining at a table, an elderly gentleman.

After cleaning out the cash register, the hoods decided the old man finishing his meal would be easy pickings, too, and herded him into the men's room where they helped themselves to his wallet. What they didn't know was that this "old man" was John Lovell, an ex-Marine who had served as pilot for two Presidents, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, and was a gentleman who not only had a Second Amendment right to bear arms, he knew how to use them.

Although 71-years of age, Lovell works out at the gym every day, doesn't smoke or use alcohol, and remains very adept at handling himself. After they got his money, the ex-Marine pulled out his business piece and opened fire, hitting both men - each in the head and one in the chest. When police arrived they found one sprawled on the floor and the other one the K-9 dogs found hiding outside in the bushes. Both were taken to the Broward General Medical Center, where Arrindell died and Gadson remained in critical but stable condition at the time of this writing.

As Police Detective Bob Rettig explained, "These criminals ought to realize that most men in their 70s have military backgrounds and aren't intimidated by idiots. Something tells me this old Marine wasn't 'in fear' even though his life was definitely at risk ... And he better not be charged! More like rewarded." Then he added, "The only thing he could be charged with is partaking in an unfair fight - one 71-year-young Marine against two punks." Authorities verified he would not be charged, but no mention was made of a reward.
 
Still warms the heart

...

This is true, but I still get a warm, comfy feeling, when I read about "men" that served, and had values, both from parents, and in this case, the USMC.

A time, and Era, and lifestyle, that is fading by the wayside quickly, in our, ever so, modern Era of (declining) lifestyles and values..


Ls
 
As Police Detective Bob Rettig explained, "These criminals ought to realize that most men in their 70s have military backgrounds and aren't intimidated by idiots. Something tells me this old Marine wasn't 'in fear' even though his life was definitely at risk ... And he better not be charged! More like rewarded."

I wish I could believe that the supportive response from the police and the newsletter's positive portrayal of self-defense would have been the same had the citizen been a young man in his early twenties with no military background.

Unfortunately, I think the reaction of the authorities and the light in which the citizen's use of lethal force was viewed had much to do with the "ideal" profile of the intended victim - elderly (and therefore, by implication, both respectable and at a physical disadvantage, both of which I'm sure he was) yet "qualified" by virtue of his military experience.

It's a wonderful thing when anybody turns the tables on her assailants and is praised for it. I only wish that factors like age, race and social/employment background didn't figure so largely into how the victim's response is treated by the police and the media.

I'm not claiming that that was necessarily the case here, since I realize that the story quoted above wasn't excerpted from a major newspaper, in addition to which there's nothing to indicate that Det. Rettig would be any less supportive of a younger victim who hadn't "served". But I have, beyond any doubt, observed this phenomenon when comparing media coverage and police quotes in other incidents.

Try defending yourself (with any weapon, let alone a firearm) when you're an able-bodied 22-year-old male - even if confronted by multiple, armed assailants. Completely different ball game most of the time.
 
You can call him a prior-Marine or former-Marine but NEVER an "ex-Marine!" The only "ex-Marines" are Lee Harvey Oswald and Senator Murtha!:mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top