FIRE MISSION - CNN handgun poll

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ever notice how these polls always swing in "our" favor toward the evening? Perhaps we're out working while the antis aren't??

Perhaps, but there might be other reasons.

1) Perhaps anti's are more likely to work in fields of work where internet browsing is acceptable, and they thus can vote earlier.

2) Perhaps the site is influenced by European voters who get off of work while it is still early in the day for Americans.

3) Perhaps pro-gunners are less likely to go to CNN unless directed there (like in this case), and so it takes a while for them to realize there is a poll to take.

4) Perhaps pro-gunners like using the word perhaps, and this influences their voting. Perhaps not.
 
Should there be stricter regulation of handguns?
Yes 33% 3171
No 67% 6498
Total Votes: 9669

This is not a scientific poll

Oneshooter
Livin in Texas
 
13th Juror
Should there be stricter regulation of handguns?
Yes 32% 3195
No 68% 6679
Total Votes: 9874

I voted and I send e-mails about 1 or 2 times a year.
John
 
Should there be stricter regulation of handguns?
Yes 31% 3298
No 69% 7231
Total Votes: 10529
 
Done.
Funny how you never hear anything if we win a poll, but if the anti's win, they act like there was a burning bush involved.
 
I voted.

Should there be stricter regulation of handguns?
Yes 30% 3401
No 70% 7789
Total Votes: 11190

This is not a scientific poll
 
It is now:

Yes 30%
No 70%

I imagine the CNN editors pink-faced, wondering whether to take the accursed thing down lest it embarrass them further.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top