4th of July: Thoughts on the Future of Liberty

Status
Not open for further replies.

bdgackle

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
114
Location
Northwest Washington
Today we celebrate the beginning of our existence as a free republic. Following our war for independence, we established ourselves as the most liberated country on the face of the earth. We rightly celebrate that achievment. Two hundred and thirty two years later, we still enjoy more freedom than most other contries on the planet. I am proud of this fact, and continue to work to preserve that freedom, and to improve the country I live in.

I am forced to consider, however, that the country I live in today is considerably less free than it was two hundred years ago. Indeed, the country I live in today is less free than MOST countries were in 1776. Consider that even in Britain, the right to carry a weapon for self defense was considered a basic civil right not even fifty years ago. Today, a substantial minority of Americans would find themselves in prison if they attempted the same. Even simple acts such as building a house on land that you own, obtaining or using a means of transportation, and earning a living through employment or independent enterprise is grounds for imprisonment in today's society if you do not obtain explicit government permission on a specific and on-going basis. Today, we are subjected to a level of surveilence that would have been unimaginable to the men who signed the declaration of independence. How many of us purchased a package of hamburgers or hot dogs today without a record of that fact being recorded in a nationally searchable database?

The enemy we faced in 1776 was external. On the simplest level, victory was a simple matter of identifying those who would deny us our freedom and pointing a musket at them. I would argue that the enemy we face today is much more insidious. The threats to our freedom today arise from the very circumstances that have brought us security and prosperity. Our enemies today are not men, they are ideas. I do not believe in the existance of a global conspiracy to deny us our rights and our dignity. I do not believe that the efforts of any concious entity have brought about the crisis we currently face. I believe, rather, that our problems emerge naturally from the nature of modern society.

Contrast the attitude of any independent man with the collectivist thought that seems to emerge from dense urban populations. Our country was founded by a backbone of men who were responsible for their own day to day survival. Over time, we have slowly allowed ourselves to become more specialized. Most of us make a living by performing a single task well. We obtain food, clothing, and shelter by relying on others specialized to do the same. This is not bad in and of itself; through cooperative effort we have enabled ourselves to live more comfortable lives than the most privelaged people of the past. This way of life, however, comes with a hidden danger. As we give up responsibility for our own day to day survival, the temptation to favor security over liberty becomes very strong. It is no coincidence that people living in cities are consistantly the first to offer up individual freedoms in exchange for promises of safety and stability.

I believe that what binds the people on this board together is a strong tendency to resist this trend. All honest men are probably capable of of becoming sheepdogs if born and raised in an environment that demands it. What sets us apart is our stubborn refusal, even our inability, to turn into sheep -- despite living in a society that should make such a transformation inevitable. This is why we find ourselves as the rear guard of liberty, fighting for the last two centuries to delay its inevitable decline. Based on the percentage of people that take up arms in defense of themselves when given the opportunity to do so, I would estimate that we represent somewhere between one and five percent of the population. Absent a catastrohic disruption of society, we are destined to remain a tiny minority. Perhaps this is what drives so many of us to fantasize about the collapse of civil society (an no one who has spent any amount of time on a gun board can deny that these sorts of thoughts are common) -- an innate knowledge that this would at least lead to the reemergence of our kind as the dominant component of the population.

My challenge to myself on this 4th of July, and to any person on this board who feels as I do, is to spread our way of thinking. Look around at the people you work with, play with, live with, and try to understand why they have become sheep. Realize that they are to be regarded with pity, not contempt. They remain potential allies, even as they vote to sacrafice their own liberty, and to forcibly confiscate ours. We do not have the luxury of regarding them as our enemies, as strong as the temptation to do so may be. We need them as much as they need us, and our only hope for long term victory is to help a significant number of them to rediscover their dignity.

In addition to the obvious political steps that most of us are already taking, I pledge to do smaller things, to try to plant the seeds of independence in my fellow citizens. I plan to buy a box of cheap pocket knives. When someone at work who normally considers me strange for carrying one asks to borrow it for some reason, I plan to make a gift of one -- to change that one small habit that too many people have given up. I will try to identify people who have never touched a gun and invite them to the range -- not to overwhelm them with propaganda but just to remove the mystery and hopefully have them associate a fun activity with firearms. I plan to attend an Appleseed shoot, and become trained as a rifle instructor, so that I can become a better rifleman and learn how to give someone else the satisfaction of doing the same. I plan to teach at least one person who has never done so how to jump start a car, and how to change a tire, so that they can experience the satisfaction of solving a problem for themselves instead of calling for help. I'm sure that all of us have small opportunites in our daily lives to take steps like these. None of us can change the world, but all of us can change one mind -- and taking the opportunity to do so is far more honorable than yeilding to the temptations of hopelessness and cynacism.
 
Two quick thoughts, if you will.

The bonds and motivations of those of 1776 were much more and greater than just a desire for personal Liberty, they did what they did for a cause greater than themselves, and knew that they risked death to do so, not for economic reasons as we have been taught.

Second, the decline of this nation, in the area of personal liberty, is not a natural progression, but rather due to the lack of knowledge, or rather a decline in understanding. Of this nation's Heritage, and beyond that, the true source of Liberty.

I applaud you for taking on the cause of Liberty, for your efforts. If Americans could just rip themselves off of the couch and do something, nearly anything, for Liberty, the results would be huge.
 
The leftwing Latinos will grow in numbers in America, and with that the view on fire arms that is prevailing in the countries they are originally from. What is right and fair depends on who you ask. The Constitution will be rewritten. Obama is the first step away from freedom. The purpose of being an American will be to pay taxes so that he can feel all mighty and generous when half is handed back through stupid projects, the rest oiling the wheels of corruption.

I find it sad that there are so many leftwingers. I don't understand their logic, or lack thereof. They are unhappy with Bush and the current politicians, saying they have had too much influence. Then why do they want a Democrat in the White House, who will raise the taxes and thus have even more influence on people's lives? If the lefties are unhappy with politics, shouldn't they vote on a person who offers them the lowest taxes, thus no power for the politicians?

I know this is just wishful thinking. The future doesn't look bright. For every bright baby born there are two idiots born. That's how it feels like. A land of socialists.
 
Nice post.

There were a tough lot of people that formed this country. They didn't want to get treated badly and had the guts enough to do something about it. Also keep in mind that allot of the people that settled this country weren't the elite of their society. Several came to North America because they had too because of something they did in Europe.

My family has been here since the late 1600's to early 1700's. Not for sure on that date. They had to or die. Don't know what the crime was they were accused of but they were on the run. Two of my family members did fight in the Revolutionary war though.
 
The leftwing Latinos will grow in numbers in America, and with that the view on fire arms that is prevailing in the countries they are originally from.

One of the most common stories that gets brought up on gun boards is that of the Asian shopkeepers establishing a defensive line around their neighborhoods during the Rodney King riots in L.A. These are descendants of immigrants that have been in the nation for less than a century, and they originate from some of the most disarmed societies on the planet. People who come here will assimilate over time -- the change can go either way. The Latino immigrants are new arrivals, many are first generation. That they don't totally assimilate is not surprising. Many of their children and grandchildren, however, have attitudes very different from their parents. Keep in mind as well that armed revolution is not unheard of in Mexico, and many Central American countries have looser arms restrictions than we do.

Many of these people do bring with them a tradition of very leftist politics, and you are right that this presents us with a challenge. I wonder how much of this tendency is cultural, and how much we help to create with the welfare state in Southern California. Even people who were not looking for a handout will very quickly fall into the trap of multi-generational welfare dependence if given the chance. Conversely, if we figure out how to help these people get started with the generation, rather than the transfer, of wealth, they will quickly find themselves with something to defend. I would imagine that that changes attitudes more effectively than anything.

The tradition of leftist politics also carries with it a tradition of coherent families and communities. Don't get me wrong, I hold socialism as one of the deeper evils that has emerged from the 20th century, but in the parts of the country that many of these people are moving to (I speak specifically of SoCal), many of them also bring values that are sorely lacking.

The demographic changes that are happening in our country are largely beyond our control -- the south west is going to look very different in 20 or 30 years whether you and I like it or not. The only thing we can do is try to minimize the dangers and maximize the opportunities it brings.
 
The reason for the decline of freedom goes deeper than that. But I agree with the rest of your sentiments.

Even though the future looks grim, it is still possible to change its course. That, however, depends on people getting their philosophy right.
 
The leftwing Latinos will grow in numbers in America, and with that the view on fire arms that is prevailing in the countries they are originally from.

I was going to post something about this comment earlier but held back. Here are my 2 cents on the matter.

The largest influx of immigrants to this country is from Mexico’s lowest socio-economic stratum. Mexicans come here seeking opportunity and find it. Not just in jobs but also in social benefits most closely associated with the Democratic Party. So when immigrants finally vote, they tend to support Democrats not because they like them but because Democrats offer more freebies.

Republicans have not figured this yet. Mexicans share la lot of common values with Christian conservatives: strong family ties, a sense of self-sufficiency because the government in Mexico never gives anyone anything, and an innate respect for a patriarchal figure both at home and in government. In Mexico, Bush has higher poll ratings than in the US because right or wrong he is seen as a strong, determined leader. Most middle and upper class Mexicans voted for Felipe Calderon, Mexico’s current president from the right wing party. Lower class Mexicans, typically the ones that come to the US, would vote for the more socialist party the PRD or the PRI, the latter being the party who ruled Mexico with an iron fist for 70 years (again the patriarchal figure).

Mexicans here and in Mexico know that their well-being depends on the US having a strong economy and world dominance. Mexicans in the US understand the politics game way too well. They know that all the talk about building fences and securing the borders amounts to election year rhetoric. They also know to a science that Republicans represent the business end of this country, which is heavily dependent on the cheap labor they provide. Sure, a few are caught in raids but it is election year.

9/11 was felt in Mexico almost as much as it was felt here. Immediately, people knew they would be losing their jobs because of a slow down in the US economy. They knew the border would be getting tighter. They knew it would be bad business in general. Then Bush goes all at it against Afghanistan and then Iraq and that restored the warm and fussy in Mexicans.

Mexicans would vote Republican in a heartbeat and support the right to bear arms without qualms, but as I said they know too well how politics work. Republicans have to find a way to milk that vote just as Mexicans have learned to milk the Democrat freebies.
 
I wholeheartedly embrace your commentary, bdgackle.

Sadly, many of the other camp would call us dinosaurs, dodo birds, like the Gunny Highway character characterized by his new commander in Heartbreak Ridge. What they fail to understand, is that we serve a purpose. We stand silently behind that glass, waiting for the call to battle.

And battle we will, the kind of personal face to face battle that most Americans do not have the stomach for. Violence that will be derided even in it's necessity. Then we will go back behind that glass, forgotten until needed again.

I do not want for civil unrest or a breakdown in civilization. Is there some other way to resurrect our founding ideals and principles, to imbue them into a new generation of citizens? I don't know that we can. We are a dwindling resource. Society has progressed past the point that we are welcome. We are an anachronism that just won't go away. We are antiques. Society does not want or need us, at least as long as society continues to advance.

Sure we occasionally stop are robbery or assault, but those instances are rare. If society falters, we will be the leaders, the rabbis of self reliance. Let us continue to prepare, and hope the day never comes.
 
While I agree with your conclusion and course of action, I disagree with the analysis as to the cause, and am cynical as to the effectiveness at this point in the game.
I am forced to consider, however, that the country I live in today is considerably less free than it was two hundred years ago.
I keep hearing that, but I don't see it. Two hundred years ago large swaths of the population were afforded no rights at all, because they were simply and arbitrarily declared not citizens. Blacks were disenfranchised on the basis of race, women on the basis of sex, state constitutions excluded people from government based on religious affiliation. It might have been 'the good ole days', a great time to be a American if you were a landowner of European descent who was a member of a mainstream faith, but not so much otherwise.
Today, we are subjected to a level of surveilence that would have been unimaginable to the men who signed the declaration of independence. How many of us purchased a package of hamburgers or hot dogs today without a record of that fact being recorded in a nationally searchable database?
Despite the Fourth Amendment, the right to privacy didn't exist until the twentieth century. People were routinely charged with criminal offenses for things we view as completely private behavior now; look at the various laws on adultery. And the ability to document your cookout related purchases is in direct relation to the conscious choice that most people make to use a card (for convenience) or a loyalty program (for price savings).
Contrast the attitude of any independent man with the collectivist thought that seems to emerge from dense urban populations. Our country was founded by a backbone of men who were responsible for their own day to day survival. Over time, we have slowly allowed ourselves to become more specialized. Most of us make a living by performing a single task well. We obtain food, clothing, and shelter by relying on others specialized to do the same.
Yep, I'm sure Thomas Jefferson was out there harvesting the back 40 at Monticello himself in between drafts of the Declaration of Independence. The Founding Fathers were just as specialized as we are today, farmers and merchants and lawyers. They depended on their immediate communities, tradesmen and servants, probably more so than we do, because technology extends our community far wider. This idea of the rugged individualist facing the world with nothing but manly grit is nostalgic nonsense, history through rose tinted glasses.
...the temptation to favor security over liberty becomes very strong.
This, IMHO is the crux of the issue. It's not a question of self sufficiency. It's a question of how much you value comfort versus security versus freedom. Patrick Henry asked "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" Too many people have such a nice comfortable life that the answer is now 'Well, yes'.

I think Americans, in general, are more free than they've ever been. But the problem is they tend to view freedom solely from their own prospective, don't care about the next guy's freedom, and are not willing to admit or accept that there is a personal and constant cost for that freedom and that cost comes in the form of safety and comfort. Freedom is intrinsically risky. Life was different two hundred years ago because risk was much more personal and immediate. If there was a wide strain of self sufficiency in the good old days, it was in the mental acceptance that actions had consequences, that people couldn't (and shouldn't) be shielded from those consequences, and that that circumstance, while unfortunate, doesn't really effect anyone else. Therefore disasters were accepted as a tragedy, but no more than that; now for piece of mind, i.e. comfort/safety somebody ought to do something so it doesn't happen again. And the only entity with the authority to do or compel someone to do, is the government. That's is the entrance ramp to the slippery slope.

For instance, once upon a time, you could walk into pretty much any decent sized department store in a major city, go to the sporting goods department and buy a pistol or rifle. You could then take your pistol or rifle, go down to the airfield, and hop on a plane, without declaring or checking your firearm, or even with it in plain sight. Then a rash of tragic events happened. Rather than chalk it up as the act of criminals, we had to do something, so we increased security, at the price of freedom. Then, when more tragic events happened, we added more and more layers of cosmetic trappings on to the security that was in place, to make people feel like we're doing even more, for their peace of mind, their comfort. Now why won't we ever get back to the point where a law abiding citizen can climb about a plane with his gun on his hip? Because it would interfere with the allusion of safety and the feeling of comfort that most people have, even though it would represent an increase in freedom, and probably an increase in actual safety. Short of a mass movement where people become willing to sacrifice their comfort and safety for freedom we've reached the limit of freedom in this country.

We have no lack of gumption in this country, just an unwillingness to get off the comfy couch.
 
We have no lack of gumption in this country, just an unwillingness to get off the comfy couch

In a nut shell, is America finished? Far from it, your quote holds the key, "Get Americans off the Couch". There are many, many illustrations of the possibilities if Americans actually wake up, get off the couch and just DO something, rather than just think they are doing something, by whining.

Bravo to the original poster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top