Gun taken (stolen) stories by anti(s)?!?!

Status
Not open for further replies.

mike7465

Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
47
So when ever I hear some anti talking about carrying a pistol they always say someone will come up and take it from you.
So I googled a lot, and I can't find any suck stories.
None.
Pretty weird huh?
I bet when I do find one, it will turn out to be propaganda.
 
It's not that it can't happen, it's just that nobody's ever been careless enough to actually let it happen.
 
Check Clayton Cramer's self defense blog. There are some instances of peoples guns being taken away from them. Many more where the BG's gun gets taken.
 
I am equally skeptical of the assertion that open carriers are deliberately targeted by criminals preemptively, which is an argument against OC that gets trumpeted loud and often.
 
Anti(s) never use logic, just feelings...

Anti(s) never use logic, just feelings. This is why they will not debate the points with you.
 
Lots of police have been killed with their own weapon after having it taken from them. It certainly does happen. But not enough for it to justify such a mindset towards carrying a sidearm.
 
Isn't that the whole reason for concealed carry? They can't take your gun if they don't know it's there.

Typical anti whining.
 
"Yellofin-
I am equally skeptical of the assertion that open carriers are deliberately targeted by criminals presumptively, which is an argument against OC that gets trumpeted loud and often."


This is what lead me on this search. I heard that statement from a few anti(s) about open cary, and wanted to see how often it happened.
 
Last edited:
My wife has a great response for this.

"Taking a gun away from somebody isn't so easy, and if it is so easy, I'll just take it back from them."
 
Anti(s) never use logic, just feelings. This is why they will not debate the points with you.

A fine approach to take in an argument is to ask them if they feel that way, if perhaps another event in their life is influencing their judgement, or if they are going to provide you with Uniform Crime Report equivalent statistics/studies that show their opinion to be a factual assertion. Don't be too mean.

Depending on whether or not you have bothered to do your own homework, you may confront them with your blindingly neutral evidence to the contrary, or just ask them to try again when they have bothered to consider that there are two sides to an argument and that they should respect your right to ask for evidence. Grade school applications of fairness should be readily apparent if not intimately comprehended by them.

Depending on your acquaintance you may also take hold of their hands and begin chanting kumbaya in order to help rid them of their fear of theft. Some gushing comments about empathy and feeling the same way they do, for the sake of the children, challenge we all have to face etc... won't go amiss.

There is the off chance this causes them to freak out, the combination of illicit and over the counter drugs circulating in their system causing them to see a massive and ungainly yet strangely intoxicating, heavily armed pink fuzzy panda on the huggy time warpath, but you're armed for just this eventuality. They did cover aborted drum circle gathering escape and evasion at your CCW class, eh? :p

Most people I have met (remember, it's not anecdotal(s), it's data!) who react with hostility toward guns just want a nice, fuzzy answer. Give it to them. The next time you meet you may start them on their path of service for citizenship. Plant the fuzzy seed! :p
 
Last edited:
This is my idea for dealing with antis and their pure feelings tactics. The basis of this idea is based on the full metal jacket design of bullet. You use a logical argument, but you wrap it up in emotion to disguise it.
 
There's an easy answer to that which has shut up a number of anti-freedom folk.

It's two parts, and you have to get them to play along with the first part.

Start in telling them about all the websites that feature story after story about successful firearm self defense directly from the news media. There's Cramer's blog, righttokeepandbeararms.com, gunnewsdaily.net, and many more. Show them that the reason for these sites is to give factual "stories" for those just like you, on the pro-freedom side.

And then ask them... "if there were actual stories in the news media that were commonly happening about people who attempted to use a gun for self defense but had the gun taken away from them by the bad guy, wouldn't it make good sense for sites such as Brady to feature them prominently on their website?:

"Shouldn't there be whole websites devoted just to those types of stories?"

"Well... where are they? Why can you go to Brady's site and not find a story archieve such as that? Why do you think that is?"

Let's use the silence of the anti-freedom sites to work for us.
 
"Taking a gun away from somebody isn't so easy, and if it is so easy, I'll just take it back from them."

Beat me to it! I don't know where I first heard this - but I got to use it on an "anti" friend recently (Yes...I DO asociate with them).

The subject came up and he said, "I could never pull a gun on anybody - they'd just take it away from me!"

I laughed and said, "If it's so easy - just take it back!"

He was speechless and looked stunned - like the Earth had shifted orbit and he couldn't figure what had just happened. Priceless!
 
Arguments made by the other side are almost always emotional. When you try hammering for some raw sources of data that haven't been spun and weaved by VPC or the like, you won't find any.
 
I've been demanding examples from anti-gunners that didn't involve cops trying to apprehend someone for easily TWENTY years. Nobody's EVER been able to.
 
Excellent point, JackBurtonJr. If peopel's guns, including those who open carry, were getting snatched even at the rate of 1 per year, I'd think VPc, Brady campaign, GunGuys, etc would be ALL over it.Not only would they feature it on theire website somehwere as proof of how carryign a gun is bad, I'm sure they would make sure the media picked up on the story and ran it too.
 
I'm sure they would make sure the media picked up on the story and ran it too.

On the other hand - I'm surprised they don't just make up stories and print 'em anyway! I guess they figure that would be much easier to refute than absurd conclusions based on junk science.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top