The bill for Heller: $3.5 million

Status
Not open for further replies.
Knowing a little about what attorneys and paralegals bill at in DC, I thought the number sounded low and as others have pointed out, what they'll end up with in their pocket is another thing.
 
Frankly, if you worked 60 hours a week at any kind of professional trade (plumber, electrician, etc.), you would not only make money comparable to most attorneys - you wouldn't have to throw down $100k of your own cash on a risky bet that doesn't always pay off to get there.
And they got a 3-7 year head start making that money. If they saved and conservatively invested money in the early years, they're ahead in the game.
 
In a case like Heller, the stakes are high, the bar is set higher, and if you lose the case, there goes your career potentially. Risk/Reward.
 
I called around last year looking for an accountant- nearly every one of them that I talked to charges $200 an hour. I used TurboTax. The attorney we used five years ago charged us $300 an hour. One court appearance alone cost me $750.

Before I embarked on my current career, I used to repair electronic equipment at the Orlando Airport location of a company that repaired ground support equipment. I was required to bill out at least 85% of my day. It was not too difficult, because we billed in 1/2 hour increments, and there was a 4 hour minimum for emergency service and a 2 hour minimum for normal service. Routine maintenance billed a minimm of one hour.

What did the company charge for my time? $45 an hour for routine, $90 an hour plus a $40 service fee for after hours and holiday calls. There were plenty of times that I came on a holiday in for a repair that took me 15 minutes to do. That means the service call cost $400 for my 15 minutes of work.

What did I make myself? $12 an hour. My skills at my trade were nowhere near what Gura's are at his own.
 
People routinely pay $100/hr for auto repair, plus parts costs. ...and that's mundane maintenance of well-understood vehicles, not arguing obscure points of Constitutional law. Also, the mechanic actually doing the work usually sees little of that $100.
 
In this discussion of costs, I think we are missiing an important point.

If this case is successful, the issue of firearms ownership being a "civil right" will be set firmly in cement.

Think what this means to those who would not allow legal CCW on their "private" premises. Once this is confirmed to be a "civil right" there will be more challenges to the "no Guns allowed" signs as an abrogation of "civol rights".
 
Not to scare our new law school students; but the whole "pot of gold at the end of the law school rainbow" thing is grossly overstated in reality. Like most other things, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Amen, brother. - from a Magna Cum Laude 2008 Graduate of the University of Miami.

Man!
________________________________________
I need to think about law school!

No you don't, see above. My friends who started construction and drilling businesses out of high school are doing much much better.

1. The lawyers for Heller are absolutely heros that took huge gambles and won. They invested their time and could have easily lost. Many thought they would lose until the end when all of the work had been done.

+1

Architects and engineers go through the same amount of schooling, or more. At the same costs. They don't get to charge anywhere near the same hourly rates as attorneys. Your argument has no merit.

The best engineers get Google, Microsoft and Cisco stock they are on a completely different pay scale then us mere mortals.

Getting an architecture degree is like taking a vow of poverty. People do it because they like it, not to make money. No problem with it, but you can't compare.
 
Architects and engineers go through the same amount of schooling, or more. At the same costs. They don't get to charge anywhere near the same hourly rates as attorneys. Your argument has no merit.

Remember, we are talking about an attorney who has accomplished what few others have done in the history of our nation.

Out of the millions of attorneys who have practiced, few ever argue in front of SCOTUS. Fewer still got to argue cases of this nature. He is at the top of his field.

Since when do we base salary on how much school you attended? I have an AS, and I make more than many engineers and architects. Supply and demand is the key. The supply for attorneys of Gura's caliber is very limited, so he can charge a premium for his services. What he does may look easy, but like most people who are good at what they do, he makes it look much easier than it is.
 
"Pay for services" and "value" are all skewed in our world and in the USA.

For instance, teachers generally take a vow of poverty - yet we entrust them to instill education, values and be a constant role model and 'baby sitter' for our children for about 1/3rd of their lives from years 5-18+. Their average salary is somewhere in the $30,000-$50,000 range at the top of public schools.

Yet we don't bat an eye when we (through our contributions to sporting events, cable TV, buying sporting goods, jerseys, tax breaks for stadiums, etc.) pay 20 year old athletes $10,000,000 to throw a baseball, football or basketball and live like a king.

Heller's attorneys are at the top of the top of the top of the pyramid as likely some of the most important attorney's that have lived in my lifetime and possibly for decades longer. They have successfully cemented the 2nd Amendment as an individual right, and spent nearly a full 3 years doing just that! They're asking for about $1,000,000 per year over that timespan to cover their risk (of losing and not being paid) and their work. I think that's a BARGAIN!
 
They're asking for about $1,000,000 per year over that timespan to cover their risk (of losing and not being paid) and their work. I think that's a BARGAIN!

Gura is asking $1,850,354, Neily $900,446.20 and Levy $663,498.40... and thats for almost 5 years. When you divide that up, it realllllly is not that much for any attorney standing before SCOTUS.

ETA - leadcounsel, I was not calling you out. Just using your quote to put it into an individual perspective for each attorney.
 
What is their legal justification for being reimbursed? I can understand asking for reimbursement of legal fees after defending yourself from unjust actions being taken against you, but Levy manufactured this test case by this own choice. -MAKster

Does it get any more "unjust" than this? And "legal justification" could be the fact that DC denied Heller his constitutional rights. Seems pretty simple to me.

As for the money, if they lose the award, we could easily compensate them by each donating $0.05. If all 80 million gun owners donated the $0.05 to the Heller cause, he would be covered to $4,000,000. I don't know about you, but I would gladly pay a nickel for this outcome.
 
A lawyer doing a family law case at the county level charges $150-$200 an hour.

The problem with family law has never been the $150-200/hr. It's always been the hour the family lawyer claims to take for each page of boilerplate he or she photocopies. Mechanics might make comparable sums including materials, but their billing practices are hugely more honest, due to enforcement of honest billing.

That said, I really doubt Gura photocopied much boilerplate in this case, and I'd be surprised if he extensively inflated his billable hours, either. The man deserves the money.
 
First, regarding the pot of gold, the rainbow and the big pile of money that Larry McLawyer swims in as a consequence of his job in the law...listen to what the following posters have said:

leadcounsel
Henry Bowman
Bartholomew Roberts

For the VAST majority of lawyers, the huge piles of money are not there. Truth be told, the market (especially for rookies) is awful. I am a 2008 grad, awaiting bar exam results, and I routinely find myself looking at jobs with starting salaries no greater than $50K per year. Most are pegged somewhere between $30-40K. This is after I have invested 3+ years in law school and a significant chunk of money. Further, these jobs are getting flooded with resumes. It is a little rough on the ego to know that you are competing with 100 candidates for 2 jobs...and the job pays $38K.

Second, I'm happy to see the members here supporting the notion that six figure legal payouts (to lawyers anyway) are justifiable. However, I wonder if we'd have the same hand-clapping and glasses clinking if the demand for attorney's fees came after a civil rights case for police brutality. I know we don't have support for payouts when it comes to other kinds of plaintiff's cases here at THR. (apples to oranges I know...but the principles are the same)

Third, I hope they get paid every red cent. :D
 
I think so. I have a lot more respect for attorneys who fight civil rights and criminal law cases than I do personal injury, contracts, and family law. Many attorneys are just chasing the dollar, but it always seemed to me that the civil rights and criminal law attorneys were for the most part chasing justice.

I could be wrong, but that is what it seems like to me.
 
Anyone have a good address to send money to Heller?

You could probably get away with sending it c/o of his attorney. ;)

Virginia Office – Alan Gura

101 N. Columbus Street, Suite 405
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Phone: 703.835.9085
Fax: 703.997.7665
 
Note: the NRA wanted this blocked.

None of the money for this lawsuit came from the NRA
 
Of course this was worth every penny. I have no problem with good attorneys being well paid for their work. What I do have a problem with is the fact that injustices can go unchallenged only because the victim(s) lack the financial means to rectify them. A less grandiose case probably wouldn't attract high caliber attorneys willing to take it on a pro bono basis. I don't fault the legal profession for that, but chalk it up as one of the crappier examples of the whole "life isn't fair" maxim.
 
What I do have a problem with is the fact that injustices can go unchallenged only because the victim(s) lack the financial means to rectify them.

As do I, which is why I am pleased that a mechanism exists to encourage civil rights litigation on behalf of clients who cannot afford to pay by the hour. It is also why I get angry that people attack the very same kind of mechanism (contingency fees) in tort litigation.
 
Also what was the actual cost to the NRA?

The NRA didn't want Heller...they thought things should go a different direction. I'm sure they incurred legal costs, but they were not paying any attorneys of record on the Heller case. (to my knowledge anyway)
 
Note: the NRA wanted this blocked.

None of the money for this lawsuit came from the NRA

Actually, one of the NRAs lead attorneys (Stephen Halbrook) consulted on the initial case (note the bill to him in the main story)

The NRA did initially fear that the case might create bad precedent when it was first brought in 2003 (with two different Justices sitting than the Court that ultimately heard the case). Given that even then it was a 5-4 case, it doesn't look like the NRAs fears were totally out-of-line.

While the NRA did try to block the case at the lower level, they did support it fully once they realized it was going to the Supreme Court with the current slate of Justices. Even Robert Levy commented that they were an immense help for the Supreme Court case when he spoke to us last fall.
 
Actually, one of the NRAs lead attorneys (Stephen Halbrook) consulted on the initial case (note the bill to him in the main story)

You are, of course, correct. What I meant (and what I should have written) was that the NRA wasn't funding any of the attorneys of record who appeared before SCOTUS.
 
Wall Street Journal quotes DC AG Nickles:

D.C. AG Peter Nickles told the Legal Times: “We obviously are going to have to look at it closely. That’s a lot of money. This is not a situation where there was a trial. Everything was done on motions. Certain kinds of work are recognized to be appropriate and certain kinds are not.”

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/08/27...e-request-hourly-rate-of-1069/#comment-284892

Blog of Legal Times says this:

Nickles said he was meeting with staff later today to discuss whether to negotiate with the Gura and the others or to contest the fee petition in court.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/08/heller-lawyers.html

QUESTION: If DC was to contest the motion for fees, how would they go about it ... upon what would they base such an argument?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top