Quick question for you Sig owners:
I have read from a lot of different reviews that people recommend the P239 over the P229 for concealed carry, due to the fact that it is smaller and easier to conceal.
From looking only at the dimensions of the two guns and looking at them side x side, the two guns look very similar in size. Yes, the p229 is slightly longer, taller, and wider, but it does not seem all that significant to me. However, I have read that even though the size differences are slight, the P239 is a much more comfortable and concealable gun to carry. I do not wear tight clothes, and so it seems to me that I would be able to conceal the p229 just as easily as the p239. So it seems to me like (in my case) it comes down to a comfort issue. Is there something I am missing? Why would the slight difference in size cause such a large difference in comfort and concealability if my usual attire is jeans and a loose fitting t-shirt? I am 6'1" 160lbs and would be carrying iwb at the 5:00 position....
I have read from a lot of different reviews that people recommend the P239 over the P229 for concealed carry, due to the fact that it is smaller and easier to conceal.
From looking only at the dimensions of the two guns and looking at them side x side, the two guns look very similar in size. Yes, the p229 is slightly longer, taller, and wider, but it does not seem all that significant to me. However, I have read that even though the size differences are slight, the P239 is a much more comfortable and concealable gun to carry. I do not wear tight clothes, and so it seems to me that I would be able to conceal the p229 just as easily as the p239. So it seems to me like (in my case) it comes down to a comfort issue. Is there something I am missing? Why would the slight difference in size cause such a large difference in comfort and concealability if my usual attire is jeans and a loose fitting t-shirt? I am 6'1" 160lbs and would be carrying iwb at the 5:00 position....