Fact or Lore ???

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shawnee

member
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
3,306
Location
Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
"Back in the day".... it was common to hear the old timers say that if a deer was shot when it had been harried, chased, shot at and in general induced into an adrenalin overload the meat would be tough as a boot sole and have a strong "gamey" taste no matter what you did to prevent it. Conversely - it was often claimed that if a deer was dropped DRT at a moment when it had no idea a hunter was anywhere near the meat would be (relatively) tender and have very little "gamey" taste.

Fact ot Lore, Lads ?

:confused::)
 
its true

its not the adrenaline that makes the meat tough and gamey, its testosterone thats released when the animal starts to run and the muscles tensing up while its running
 
Fact.

I've hunted pronghorns both ways, the old (fun) way, rumbling across a pasture in a pickup at 60 MPH, trying to head them off at the pass, and then jump out and shoot. The last few years, I've hunted on foot, and the bucks never knew what hit them.

There's a definite difference in taste. Not sure about the "tough" part though.
 
Don't know about the tough but I firmly believe that you can taste the difference. I speculate that it's the main reason most people who trap hogs say that they don't taste good.
 
The first deer I ever shot took a long time to go down ( weird shot with a corlokt .300 savage) , anyways my dog wouldn't even eat it........
 
A lot of "oldtimers" that I know & have hunted with swear by that.Most have killed /eaten more deer than I have.Maybe my taste buds are numb,but I've never been able to tell the difference.
 
The chinese claim that adrenaline makes house cats taste better. That's why they skin the cats first, then kill them after they're skinned.
 
Here is some information on stress in livestock prior to slaughter. Similar effects can be expected in wild game.

An animal experiencing stress will have physiological changes including changes in heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature and respiration. Several stress hormones are released into the blood stream including epinephrine and norepinephrine. Epinephrine helps to break down glycogen (stored form of glucose in the liver and muscles) into glucose. The stored chemical engergy in glucose and oxygen are converted to energy for the animals muscles. The normal byproducts of this conversion are carbon dioxide and water. When there is not enough oxygen present for this conversion, glucose is still converted to energy, but the byproducts are lactic acid and water.

To understand the effects of stress on final meat quality, it is important to understand the relationship of glycogen and lactic acid to pH decline in meat after slaughter. An animal which has not been stressed will have normal levels of glycogen in its body. When the animal is slaughtered and exsanguinated, the metabolic process continues, however there is no longer circulating oxygen. Without the presents of oxygen, the breakdown of glycogen/glucose results in a buildup of latic acid which then causes a drop in pH of the meat.

The final quality of meat is greatly affected by the rate of pH decline in the meat after slaughter. If there was a great lactic acid buildup before slaughter, the pH of the meat declines too quickly after slaughter and a Pale, Soft, Exudative (PSE) condition may develop. As suggested by the name, the affected meat is pale, soft, and fluid may drip from the surface.

At the other extreme, if the animal is glycogen depleted before slaughter the pH may not drop quickly enough after slaughter because there is not enough lactic acid produced. In this case the meat will be very dry and dark in color. This condition is known as Dark Firm Dry (DFD) meat. An additional problem with this type of meat is that it is more susceptible to spoiling since it lacks the lactic acid which normally helps retard growth of microorganisms after slaughter. Note that glycogen deficiency may also be the result of too much physical activity or inadequate diet before slaughter.
 
I know for a fact that Mt. Goat that has been spooked/run tastes a wee too strong for enjoyable consumption.
 
Seems to me...

If this were the case, that nearly every bow-killed animal would taste poorly, since there is certainly more time involved in the death. Now, I have seen deer react to an arrow pass-through no more violently that to a bee sting, and walk off until they simply tip over. Usually, though they violently explode from the area on the run. I guess I understand the reasoning, but have never detected any "off" flavor or texture even in the those deer that took extended tracking to locate....???
 
All livestock is stressed out to the max just before slaughter. Some of the animals never even make it off the semi. The stress of the ride to the slaughter house is more than some of them can handle.

The rule is that any animal that is unable to walk un aided to the killing floor is unfit for human consumption. So sometimes they just let an exausted animal lay there and rest up a bit after staggering off the semi-trailer before herding it into the chute to the killing floor. If it still can't make it, then it is ground up whole, guts and all, and sent to rendering.
 
Sounds Myth-like to me

or maybe all animals should be killed in their sleep for a best-rested, buttery- smooth taste. I've never seen any animal totally-relaxed during dying. They all TASTE good! Humans are the dominant hunters on planet Earth, but I wonder if a Gray Wolf could actually taste the difference in a human at whatever state of fear the human displayed upon his or her demise. I think the Wolf wouldn't realize much difference in flavor. I feel age and toughness of muscle-mass create the actual flavor. A chubby human with poor muscle strength probably goes down the gullet easiest and sweetest. cliffy, just a thought.
 
Nothing with a "package" makes it to the slaughterhouse, just steers and old cows. Anything else goes to rendering/glue factory.

Handling is key to good meat.
 
If this were the case, that nearly every bow-killed animal would taste poorly, since there is certainly more time involved in the death. Now, I have seen deer react to an arrow pass-through no more violently that to a bee sting, and walk off until they simply tip over. Usually, though they violently explode from the area on the run. I guess I understand the reasoning, but have never detected any "off" flavor or texture even in the those deer that took extended tracking to locate....???

While it may affect the taste to some degree - It certainly isn't enough to put me off. I've shot well over 30 deer in my 15 years of hunting and I've yet to turn away any of the meat. I think the handling afterwards has much more effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top