Nomenclature: Should WASR-10s be referred to as AK-47s?

Should WASR-10s be called AK-47s?

  • No Way!

    Votes: 17 16.5%
  • Of Course!

    Votes: 53 51.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 7 6.8%
  • I cannot hear you, I have a banana in my ear.

    Votes: 26 25.2%

  • Total voters
    103
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
"AK" in the generic sense, yes. "AK-47", no. It is an AK-47 lookalike, not a real NFA Title 2 restricted AK-47, just like one would not call a Rock River Arms LAR-15 an "M16".

That goes for all civilian AK's, IMO. I own a Romanian SAR-1, and usually refer to it as simply an "AK".
 
The WASR-10 is an AKM.

But I call any Kalashnikov variant an AK to keep it short (AK-47, AKM, AK-74, AKS-74U, AK-105, etc. they're all AKs).
 
Last edited:
If it LOOKS like a duck and QUACKS like a duck --- it must be a AK-47.
Except it doesn't quack like the duck. A civilian AK functions like an SKS or Ruger Mini Thirty, not an AK-47.

Again, AK-47 or AKM-47 is a pretty specific designation, just like "M16" or "M16A1". A civilian AK may look much an AK-47 or AKM-47 depending on receiver construction, and it shares some parts commonality, but it is not the same gun, IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top