Lonestar.45
Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,077
Anything other than "A" in my neck of the woods is a good way to get in some serious trouble.
YMMV
YMMV
I have known many a game warden to look the other way when a poor man killed a deer.
Actually, it does. A man who will not bother to ask permission will also leave gates open, shoot at farm implements, bring his 4X4 onto the property to retrieve the carcass of the deer he killed.Walking on land does not harm the land or the landowner's billfold.
"Well, no. Look, I'm really sorry, I've known your dad since he was a boy and he was bucking hay for me in the summers, and I know that like him, you're OK. But I've had so much trouble with cut fences, crop damage, gates left open, and other stuff, that I've just shut it down. If you aren't family, you don't hunt on my ground."
We've had instances where folks have tried claiming areas as "private ground" when it absolutely is not.
I've done plenty of hunting in the Mountain West.I just don't think he has any idea of the differences between the geography, laws and conventions where he lives, and in the Mountain West.
a visit to the tax assessor to check if the land you intend to hunt is privately owned is common sense.
Second, while BLM land can be hunted, courtesy is always a good idea.
And you sound like you take this personally.And you really don't sound like you've hunted anywhere around here.
a guy with grazing rights was riding gaurd on BLM land. Why? The previous year, some idiot shot one of his cows and tagged it with their doe tag.
It looks like you've lost your cool and want to blame someone else.Vern, you have specifically targeted what I've posted, based on assumptions that have nothing to do with the reality of hunting here.
IMO that says a lot more about you than it does about me, but if it sounds like I was responding to what you wrote in response to my posts, yes, in fact, I was.
However, if he uses a firearm to try to force someone off public land,
The previous year, some idiot shot one of his cows and tagged it with their doe tag.
but if it's unfenced, unposted and not signed as to being private property, and uncultivated in a new area new to me? I'll hunt that, as there's no real way to know if it's private or not without a GPS and a US gelogical map on you.
Well I could turn that around and ask "Under what theory are letting people know you don't want them on your land, if you're not going to bother to fence it or even put up a few signs?" Especially when a sign nailed on a tree is very very cheap & easy to do, relative to fencing.
I thank everyone for their votes. I would also like to ask:
"For those that voted 'A', would your answer be the SAME or DIFFERENT if it was unposted, un-fenced PUBLIC land - just unimproved unused land own by the federal, state, or city, government and no particular rules having been created by the gov't entity relating to the land?"
Pull up that county's tax assessor website and get the name of the owner - takes about 5 minutes and it's free - ask permission.