Another epic FAIL..

Status
Not open for further replies.
The officers – some on motorbikes – will carrying out weapon "sweeps" of their neighbourhoods
Doesn't that have the ring of Communist Russia? The citizens have no right to bear arms, and machine gun totting authorities make 'sweeps' through neighborhoods confiscating weapons.
 
Nevermind the fail, or the rubbish in the text of the article...

How about mounting a BUIS between your 3X optic and your Aimpoint?

Huh?
 
Does that mean my $1,000 AR might actually be a $3,000 HK94? I mean cause it does have the longer barrel.
 
Nevermind the fail, or the rubbish in the text of the article...

How about mounting a BUIS between your 3X optic and your Aimpoint?

Huh?

??? I want to know the answer to that too.

Maybe the focal length of the Aimpoint is really long? It still doesn't make sense. You would want the rear sight as far back so you would have a longer sight radius.
 
There can't be any gun crime in the UK, they already outlawed those things.

Doesn't make any sense....

And yes, nice MP5's.... I have one just like that and I didn't even know it.
 
It actually might make a certain amount of sense if you have limited rail space. If you needed to deploy the BUIS, you could simply flip the magnifier to the side. On the other hand, you can't position the magnifier forward of the BUIS without changing the eye relief.
 
The article admitted the gangs still had guns.....

Interesting......seems we always say the criminals will still get guns.......
and WAIT. The answer is to arm the good guys. Now for them to realize the average joe has the right to protect himself and not rely on government.....which doesnt do anything all that well (Thank goodness).
 
The main problem they are having is not so much with the local gangs but with Turkish, Arab and other ethnic gangs from foreign countries that have immigrated to the UK, and most of them illegally.

Sound familiar?
 
This is what really got me:
Gill Marshall-Andrews, chairwoman of the Gun Control Network campaign group, described the routine arming of officers as a "very retrograde step" and warned that it could lead to higher levels of gun crime.

"This is likely to raise the stakes and encourage more criminals, especially young criminals, to arm themselves," she said.

But I thought that guns were all but banned in England. I thought that you had to have a government approved need to own a gun, and fill out lots of paperwork, submit to background checks and what not, pay a lot of fees, register it, etc. Are you telling me that criminals are managing to find a loophole and slip through the cracks? :confused:

How can the police having guns encourage the criminals to carry guns if the criminals don't have guns because your excellent gun control laws got rid of the evil things??? :confused:

"When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns"

I guess it's more than just a bumper sticker slogan as Dennis A. Henigan claims it is.
 
You think they would have learned to better arm themselves when they got outgunned back in '76 and I do mean 1776.
 
Doesn't that have the ring of Communist Russia? The citizens have no right to bear arms, and machine gun totting authorities make 'sweeps' through neighborhoods confiscating weapons.

England is now everything the UK and the US used to cite as proof that the Soviet Union was unfree.

They would cite and make fun of the requirement to present papers when passing through various security points. Like the Nazis required before them throughout thier occupied territories. Present your papers that show who you are everywhere you go, or it is presumed you have something to hide and are subject to arrest on suspicion of doing something wrong.
Proof of thier authoritarian nature.

Now a requirement to present papers or state issued ID is normal, and similar checkpoints can be and are set up, including random weapon checkpoints.


They used to make fun of how the Soviets tried to spy on everyone, using secret police, and various techniques to learn and verify that what citizens were doing in thier private lives was not something prohibited.
Citing such secret police and spying showed they were authoritarian and unfree, while no such thing was required in a free nation.
Now the UK greatly exceeds anything the Soviets could ever do in that area. They have government monitored and recorded cameras throughout most of society, covering almost all of thier major cities, and even cameras in thier forests!
They have records of most electronic communication, and most methods later adopted in the US are trialed in Britain first.
They spy on thier people in some sophisticated ways. Not just with cameras, but a host of other information. They use facial recognition software, license plate tracking software, and also track the financial records of thier citizens.
The list of ways they keep track of everyone are things the soviets with thier technology of the day could never have accomplished.

I could go own about a list of comparisons of the very things the UN and NATO once cited as proof of Soviet oppression and why England and America were so much better. Things which are considered normal in the UK now, and in fact go beyond the capabilities the Soviets ever had during the cold war to track and control thier citizens.


In fact it is even illegal now to take pictures of LEO and military in the UK, and you can get up to 10 years in prison for it:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29225389/

England is the new authoritarian example for the world.

Even gun rights activists that say the wrong things or have the wrong type of website are now known to disappear as covered in a recent thread on THR. Which is perfectly legal now under thier new anti-terror laws. The population should be terrified of such "anti-terror" legislation.
 
Gee whiz, and I thought since they banned guns in England that there would be no more guns in the hands of criminals! What the heck do they need CO19 for?

And I love this part... "Gill Marshall-Andrews, chairwoman of the Gun Control Network campaign group, described the routine arming of officers as a "very retrograde step" and warned that it could lead to higher levels of gun crime."

Uhh so cops + guns = crime? Bold theory, let's see if it plays out...
 
Sounds like 1984 is getting closer every day there. Time for our friend from V for Vendetta I guess.
 
Uhh so cops + guns = crime? Bold theory, let's see if it plays out...

Hey! We could expand on this theory!

If cops + guns = crime....maybe soldiers + guns = war, right?

There we have it! If the best way to beat crime is for the police to be unarmed....

..the best way to win a war is FOR OUR SOLDIERS TO NOT HAVE GUNS!

right?...

right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top