Why aren't Ruger semi-auto pistols popular?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ruger semi-auto pistols seem quite popular to me. I owned one for 7 years. And, am looking for one now. (thinking about the P345). Many of my gunny friends own one, or have owned them.

Now, I do imagine that when you say semi-auto pistol, you are referring to the P-series, seeing as how the Ruger .22 pistols are some of the most popular in the WORLD.

The P-series are liked by some. Not liked by others. They are, however, unarguably the ugly cousin to Smith and Wesson, Beretta and Sig for full-sized DA pistols for service use. That being said, the P95 might be the best handgun value out there.

The P89, P90, and P345 are all good shooting pistols that are very accurate and durable.... and the SR9, well, it is really good. It's like many of the striker-fired semi-autos, but atleast Ruger did it right when they got into that field.

Basically, Ruger is a good quality gun for everyone, and they make "everyman" pieces (I bought a P95 when I was making 23k a year as a bank's bill collector at the age of 21).
 
It's interesting to see that .22s are such high volume. I never knew that. Gary, you are certainly right, I don't think there is much call to debate "good or bad" with Ruger .22s.

Ken
 
Last edited:
They're too big and heavy to be practical for carrying.

They're too clunky looking and plastic to be a firearm I'd bond to.

They're reliable and accurate.

They're reasonably priced.
 
So now that they released a compact pistol, is their popularity going to increase? Seems the biggest gripe I've been reading is that they make only full size autos which are hard to conceal.
 
So I should not loathe Hitler, Lincoln, Mao, Stalin etc?

LOL, Guillermo, it's rare to see Lincoln lumped in with Hitler, Mao, and Stalin. Of course, I realize you're from the South, but that is really holding a grudge for a long, long time. ;)

I figger, loathe them when they are alive, study them after they are dead. With some of 'em, the sooner they are available for study, the better.
 
I've owned two P-series Ruger pistols, a P90 and a P91DC. Both of them were basically junk, and I haven't owned a P-series pistol since, nor do I plan to. The P90 was reasonably accurate, but it was unreliable and the grip was awful. It was also extremely top heavy. The P91 was reliable, but it was miss the barn from inside accurate and suffered from the same ergonomic problems as the P90. I owned both pistols in the early 90's, so I'm sure the P-series line has improved some, but every time I look at one in a store, at a show, or one from the street (crooks like the P-series guns), I'm unimpressed.

I don't have any experience with the SR9 or the LCP. I don't have any use for another full size 9mm or the .380 at all. I am sure they are good pistols. The SR9 has a lot better ergonomics than the P-series guns for sure.

On the other hand I own two SP101 revolvers and a Ruger Standard .22LR (pre-MK I) and I have plans to buy a GP100, a Super Blackhawk, and probably the new Blackhawk in .327 Federal. I think Ruger makes some great guns, but their centerfire autos don't interest me much at all.
 
it's rare to see Lincoln lumped in with Hitler, Mao, and Stalin.

Lincoln used the power of government to illegally kill a bunch of people...he holds that in common with the others.

I figger, loathe them when they are alive, study them after they are dead. With some of 'em, the sooner they are available for study, the better.

Some it is appropriate to toast their assumption of room temp. I would name a couple but don't want to get my nose slapped by a moderator. It hurts and the rolled up newspaper leaves ink marks.
 
I own a large number of pistols like Sig, HK, Korth, Brown, Wilson, and the like. They cost a pretty penny, are accurate, and some are even durable.

I also own a P85 pre-Mk.I, a Mk.I Standard, a Mk.II Standard, a 22/45, a couple of Security-Sixes, a New Model Super-Single-Six, a Super Blackhawk, a Super Redhawk, a KP90, a KP97DC, a P345, a pair of P95s, and an SR9.

Why? Because they are affordable, accurate enough to win a local IDPA Match with, durable, and easy to use. They balance fine in my large hands, and the triggers, after being broken in, are quite controllable.

I find the controls on the CZ series to be much less esthetically pleasing, looking like after thoughts in shape, and see far too many operating problems in my 40P to ever trust them as CCW.

ANY full-size pistol is going to be hard to conceal with today's normal dress. Not just a Ruger. Try concealing a P92FS, or a P220, or a S&W Model M&P full-size. If you can do that, you can just as easily conceal a P89/90/97.

Beauty is in eyes of the beholder, unless you're on an Internet Forum, where one person's opinion suddenly seems like a great idea to jump on.

As for the brain dead who hold Ruger responsible for politics, what about SAAMI and S&W? S&W has to be sold because of their error, to get out of the agreement. Why not hate them the same? Hypocrisy is so easily found.
 
Lincoln used the power of government to illegally kill a bunch of people...

I think that throughout history most governments make sure they pass some law making whatever they plan to do "legal". Sometimes they even do it after the fact. Human capacity for rationalization seems boundless. It can be very difficult to tell the good guys from the bad guys sometimes but on occasion, at least in a few cases, it's pretty much a slam dunk.
 
"I figger, loathe them when they are alive, study them after they are dead. With some of 'em, the sooner they are available for study, the better." Now that's funny,I don't care who you are,that's funny right thar!(Thanks Larry)
 
...I love to read the negative comments on Ruger P-series...leaves more out there for me to buy this year!!! Love 'em!!!!! Will never buy another new Ruger Semi-Auto...
 
So I should not loathe Hitler, Lincoln, Mao, Stalin etc?
You missed my point. A lot of people still hold grudge against ole Bill, so they refuse to buy any Ruger guns these days, even after he is long dead and gone, and the current Ruger is run by different folks. Same thing with S&W during the AWB, when the company was owned by some British outfit.
By your reasoning, no one should buy stuff from Germany? or the USA? (Oops, you live here.:evil:). Are you absolutely sure that anything you ever possessed or currently own never come from China?
Sorry about the politics, mods. I'm done, now.:eek:
 
The Ruger fans should really thank the manufacturer of Hi Point for finally making an uglier gun than the P Series:neener:
 
Dang it you can call my P series big, bulky, built like a tank, whatever but to me it's Purrrty!
 
3314.jpg

http://www.ruger-firearms.com/products/sr9cBlackenedAlloy/models.html
 
By your reasoning, no one should buy stuff from Germany?[/QUOTE]

Didn't say anything about Germany


or the USA? (Oops, you live here.).

hardly a good comparison


Are you absolutely sure that anything you ever possessed or currently own never come from China?

I didn't mention china either...and it is impossible not to own anything recently made wo having anything manufactured by the Chinese

and BTW, I am fine w Ruger products
 
Pick one up and you'll see. For just a few bucks more you can get a much better pistol, especially ergonomically.
 
The Ruger fans should really thank the manufacturer of Hi Point for finally making an uglier gun than the P Series

Why? we already had GLOCK to thank for that. :neener:
 
The Reason I trade my P-89 DC 9mm was I couldn't CCW it at all. It was a great range gun and it never gave me a minutes trouble. The Trigger was great on mine.
 
Why? For the same reason that S & W semiautos aren't more popular: There are SO MANY other better choices out there to choose from. HK, Sig, CZ, Glock, XD, etc

I guess you haven't been playing attention to the M&P lately. Its much more popular than the HK, which made #1 on your list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top