Changing cyclic rate
- Thread starter o Unforgiven o
- Start date
- Status
I will say that I haven't the experience with the M-11/9...that one is quite decked out with the shoulder stock and foregrip...but I have had experience with the M-11 (.380) and the M-10 (.45)
The M-11 was very pleasant and controllable in burst fire.
The M-10 did take a little practice to get 2-3 controlled rounds on target, but it was really a lot of fun, and very controllable, when you added a suppressor
The M-11 was very pleasant and controllable in burst fire.
The M-10 did take a little practice to get 2-3 controlled rounds on target, but it was really a lot of fun, and very controllable, when you added a suppressor
gun guy
Member
well gee, by 1974, when i was there, the mac had been around for about what, 10 years, and the greyback wasn't hauling missles anymore,,,what did you say it was hauling, highly trained operatives? 
thanks for verifying what I said. sorry about the typo with cobray.
thanks for verifying what I said. sorry about the typo with cobray.
Last edited:
Funny how you focus on the one issue that "proves" you right, whilst glossing over the glut of mistakes, false experiences, et al.well gee, by 1974, when i was there, the mac had been around for about what, 10 years, and the greyback wasn't hauling missles anymore,,,what did you say it was hauling, highly trained operatives?
TexasRifleman
Moderator Emeritus
The OP asked the hows and whys of changing cyclic rate and that was well answered by several folks. The rest is a debate on the usefulness of some types of subguns. That's deserving of it's own discussion if done thoughtfully and politely, it's a long debated topic for sure.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
