My new Smith & Wesson 342, my thoughts, and looking for your advice.

Status
Not open for further replies.

desert gator

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
288
Location
Arizona
Well yesterday I went ahead and picked up a Smith & Wesson 342. In looking for advice and people opinions on them. I saw that people seemed to be divided about 50/50 if its worth owning due to the strong recoil. This is my first Revolver (I own 3 autoloaders). I went ahead and picked it up because I thought it was a good deal, I got it $400 from a single mom who has just had it laying around for a while. It looks in almost perfect condition and does not have the locking key mechanism for the trigger and hammer.
Looking at the weight the 342 is 10.8 oz which seems really light, but heck the 340pd airlite is 11.4 oz, only .6oz heavier and people by those up, and the M&P 340 is 13.3oz only 2.5oz heavier and it seems like a million people have those. Does 2.5 oz really make a huge diff on felt recoil?
At first I was thinking man maybe I made a bad purchase, all this negativity about how hard it kicks. So this morning I woke up bright and early and went out to shoot it. I was expecting the worst. I was expecting to fire one shot through it and lay it down and say yup that was a stupid purchase. Surprisingly I didnt. Does it kick hard....yes, is it a little uncomfortable and slightly painful to shoot....yes, but is it still fun to shoot....yes. However was it as terrible as I thought it was going to be and as bad as some people made it out to be? Definantly not.
The only pain I really got from it was in the palm of my hand, but to be honest I played catch with my brother the other day tossing the baseball around and that honestly left my hand more sore than this did. I shot a box of 50 125 grain reloads through it at standard pressure, then a box of twenty corbon 125 grain +p through it and had fun.
All and all I will hang onto the gun at least for now. I carry a kahr pm9 so this wont be my main carry weapon, just when the mood strikes me. To be honest it will probably spend most its time in the glove box and gym bag.
I plan on adding a ctc grip to the gun which adds 1.9 oz to the gun bringing it to 12.7, also it will give me allot more rubber in the palm and webbing of my hand instead of leaving it exposed to the metal on the back of the grip right now. This should increase the shooting pleasure of this gun.
A question I have being new to revolvers is if I should chose to in the future could that titanium cylinder be switched out for a steel one like what on the M&P 340? That would add some recoil reduction and I here that the titanium is delicate when it comes to cleaning it. Anyway any advice on how to take care of this revolver would be great. Tell me what a new revolver guy needs to know.
 
Last edited:
You are a sick person to not mind the recoil. Just joke'n.. I have a Charter Arms ultra lite 38 at 12oz and with a 3 finger grip it is controlable but with the two finger grip it can be viscous with carry ammo. NO more two finger grips for me. If you want to change the cylinder it might be cheaper to just sell that one and get what you want. Don't know about the cleaning of titanium, I guess i would treat like any gun. Kroil and break free for cleaning. Local gun range owner carry's a titanium and use's there sonic cleaner and killed the look but still works good. Use wadcutters for practice and shoot enought carry ammo to know where it shoots.
 
I have a powerported 642, which is probably the Smith lightweight with the least amount of recoil. A large rubber grip that covers the backstrap does make a difference; I installed a Pachmayr Compac on mine, and I'd expect that a CT grip would also be a good choice.

A trigger shoe would arguably add a fraction of an ounce, too. I've thought of getting one just for the contrasting look of the thing, but I'd be wary about using it in a holster that's highly molded in the trigger area.

I've heard various suggestions about cleaning a titanium cylinder, but the only one I can remember was that automotive cleaner for aluminum wheel rims will supposedly work well. I'd be careful about getting any on other parts of the gun; if you go that route I'd suggest cleaning the cylinder first & the rest next to mop up any stray drops.

I'd think a small revolver would make an ideal glovebox / gym bag gun. You don't have to worry as much about dust & grit as you do with an auto.
 
Of course, the larger and heavier you make the grip, the more you defeat the purpose of the gun in the first place...
 
David that is very true, however I dont plan to pocket carry this gun. My thighs are very large causing it a tight fit for my keys, let alone a gun. It would be bag carried and iwb carried.

Wolfeye, you are right this gun is good to keep crud out and use as a gym/gymbag gun. I also like that I paid 400 for it so if it ever did get stolen from my glovebox, or my bag get stolen (i dont anticipate either happeining) I would be much happier with it over my 799 dollar pm9 getting stolen.
 
Since the recoil doesn't bother you that much I wouldn't spend the money for a s.s. cylinder. As for cleaning the Ti cylinder, Smith and Wesson says "DO NOT USE HOPPE'S#9 " for cleaning. Apparently the chem.s weaken the Ti. The more you shoot snubs the more of them you buy THEY ARE ADDICTIVE.
 
On the smith and wesson forums people say that I can have the gun sent in and for 115 dollars have the titanium cylinder swapped out for a ss one, but the catch is that its about a 3 month turnaround:eek: It would be nice though to have some reduction in the recoil from it. I wonder how complicated this process is, maybe I could just order the right stuff and take it to a local gunsmith?? It would essential become the equivalent of a smith and wesson M&P 340 having the same frame and a ss cylinder, minus not having the night sight.

Also I was wondering about warranty. Im not sure how old this gun is it looks brand new but I get the feeling they where made around 99-02 time. The case still has the warranty card in it though I wonder if it would still be good if I turned it in. Of course if I did swap out the cylinder Im sure that the warranty toast anyway.
 
The reason for the lightweight guns is comfort in carry. Why spend money to change that?

Get a more pleasant self-defense round to shoot with lower recoil. Unless you fear the meth-zombie-biker, it will work. And the gun will be comfortable.

As said before, why redo a gun from its designed purpose. Sell it and get a heavier one.

Snubbies and recoil go together.
 
Sorry, if this is a hijack but I promise to be short

Since the recoil doesn't bother you that much I wouldn't spend the money for a s.s. cylinder. As for cleaning the Ti cylinder, Smith and Wesson says "DO NOT USE HOPPE'S#9 " for cleaning. Apparently the chem.s weaken the Ti. The more you shoot snubs the more of them you buy THEY ARE ADDICTIVE.

The above statement concerned me. I have an airweight bodyguard model 638-3 and I was wondering if I can use Hoppe's#9. That's all I have been using, but I don't want to break my weapon. I thought mine was a stainless steel cylinder and barrel and aluminum frame, but I could be wrong.

Does anyone know the frame material for a 638 and the appropriate cleaning material?
 
^^
What he said.
If you paid $400 for pre-lock 342, you will never lose a dime on that purchase. That is not a common revolver, and will command a decent price if it is in decent shape.

If you want something with a steel cylinder, buy a 642...and sell me that 342. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top