probably a dumb question but...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mooseman

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
904
Location
Just outside of Philadelphia
I just bought a 22 mag chuckster and because of the placement of the rails they tend to leave the scope uncomfortable far forward. Is it a terrible idea to use just one ring? The recoil shouldn't be a problem but this is going on a hunting rifle so I'm worried that it might be delicate this way. My other options would be to use a type of ring that's back swept for want of a better term or to use regular rings and just get used to it. What do you folks think? There's nothing on the rifle currently.:confused:
 
I wouldn't go with just one ring. That wouldn't be secure enough. B-Square make extension rings for .22s with grooved receivers that provide 3/4 inch of extension.
 
Assuming Mossberg Chuckster with 3/8" Weaver-style tip-off mount grooves

The 3/8" grooves for Weaver-style mounts are different positions on every .22 rifle I have owned; I have had to select different scopes (in 3/4" 7/8" and 1" diameters) for different receivers based on the design of the tubes allowing rings to be placed in positions compatible between scope & rifle for proper eye relief.

There is a extension base for the Winchester 9422 rifle that fits the 3/8" receiver grooves to allow both 3/8" '.22' tip-off and regular Weaver 'biggame' detachable mounts. It also raises the scope about 1/4". That could be a possible solution IF it does not interfer with the Chuckster bolt handle.

ADDED: if someone makes a Picatinny rail extension on the same principle as the 9422 mount, it would be a big help to owners of .22 rifles with the standard grooved receiver.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top