I believe I am now certifiably insane. I was an AR hater once, and young
As I've stated on posts before, I had detested the very existance of Eugene Stoner's rifle. I didn't like the direct gas impingement system, I didn't like the caliber, I didn't like the goofy "carry handle" and the way the rifle looked overall and I didn't like how it was forced down the throat of our military. I just plain didn't like it. I guess the biggest detractor for me was its caliber. Now I'm no physics expert, but I just can't embrace the .223 when there are just so many more effective alternatives out there.
Then along comes alternative calibers for the AR platform and it peaks my interest, the more I looked at them the more appealing they became, especially the flat-top models. There just weren't many other alternatives to choose from.
For .30 cal rifles, I was a die-hard M1 Garand/M1A rifle fan I'd even resort to a bolt-action if I needed a scoped .30 cal.
I ended up with all three for awhile, a Garand, an M1A and just recently a Remington SPS Tactical in .308.
Being the pragmatist that I am I like to take things down to their lowest common denominator, why three .30 cals when one would do for everything?
The Garands and M1A series of rifles were not designed to be scope friendly, I did scope the M1A and it was awkward and clumsy and made it heavier than it already was....duh. So I put it back to its original form and bought the .308 bolt gun.
Then I start thinking, how will I ever apply the M1A? If I need to shoot at longer ranges, I'll be taking the bolt gun. If I ever feel I need short to medium ranges unscoped or with irons I have an AK and I have my other RRA LAR-6.8 with a red dot on it, all my bases were covered and couldn't find a niche for the M1A.
I never was a big fan of bolt-actions, I just had them because there weren't many affordable options for "scopable" .30 cal semi-auto rifles.
As much as its not an issue with trained shooters, I never like the operating rod exposed on the M1/M1A rifles, I never got caught or injured by it when firing, but it made me consider other rifles such as the HK or FAL, rifles without any large masses of exposed high-speed reciprocating mechanisms
I owned an HK once (actually the PTR-91) and it had atrocious ergonomics and operating functions, got rid of it quick. Then I considered the FAL, and as I was considering it the thought crossed my mind, why not just get a .308 AR that is scope ready, it would have the same form and function as the other AR, is shorter than the M1/M1A and doesn't have any of its operating mechanisms exposed, is semi-automatic and has hi-cap magazines.
So here I am, with my new .308 AR, feeling like I should be feeling guilty for letting go of my other .30 caliber rifles and replacing them with this one......but I just can't
Now, where can I find good quality affordable FAL metric 20-round mags at?
As I've stated on posts before, I had detested the very existance of Eugene Stoner's rifle. I didn't like the direct gas impingement system, I didn't like the caliber, I didn't like the goofy "carry handle" and the way the rifle looked overall and I didn't like how it was forced down the throat of our military. I just plain didn't like it. I guess the biggest detractor for me was its caliber. Now I'm no physics expert, but I just can't embrace the .223 when there are just so many more effective alternatives out there.
Then along comes alternative calibers for the AR platform and it peaks my interest, the more I looked at them the more appealing they became, especially the flat-top models. There just weren't many other alternatives to choose from.
For .30 cal rifles, I was a die-hard M1 Garand/M1A rifle fan I'd even resort to a bolt-action if I needed a scoped .30 cal.
I ended up with all three for awhile, a Garand, an M1A and just recently a Remington SPS Tactical in .308.
Being the pragmatist that I am I like to take things down to their lowest common denominator, why three .30 cals when one would do for everything?
The Garands and M1A series of rifles were not designed to be scope friendly, I did scope the M1A and it was awkward and clumsy and made it heavier than it already was....duh. So I put it back to its original form and bought the .308 bolt gun.
Then I start thinking, how will I ever apply the M1A? If I need to shoot at longer ranges, I'll be taking the bolt gun. If I ever feel I need short to medium ranges unscoped or with irons I have an AK and I have my other RRA LAR-6.8 with a red dot on it, all my bases were covered and couldn't find a niche for the M1A.
I never was a big fan of bolt-actions, I just had them because there weren't many affordable options for "scopable" .30 cal semi-auto rifles.
As much as its not an issue with trained shooters, I never like the operating rod exposed on the M1/M1A rifles, I never got caught or injured by it when firing, but it made me consider other rifles such as the HK or FAL, rifles without any large masses of exposed high-speed reciprocating mechanisms
I owned an HK once (actually the PTR-91) and it had atrocious ergonomics and operating functions, got rid of it quick. Then I considered the FAL, and as I was considering it the thought crossed my mind, why not just get a .308 AR that is scope ready, it would have the same form and function as the other AR, is shorter than the M1/M1A and doesn't have any of its operating mechanisms exposed, is semi-automatic and has hi-cap magazines.
So here I am, with my new .308 AR, feeling like I should be feeling guilty for letting go of my other .30 caliber rifles and replacing them with this one......but I just can't
Now, where can I find good quality affordable FAL metric 20-round mags at?
Last edited: