I've had all the MBR's (main battle rifle), H&K 91, PTR 91's, FAL's, AR-10's, Dragonov's, M1 Garands, and not that I disliked any of them, they were all a blast to shoot. But each had it's own little idiosyncracies that detracted from the overall rifle. With the exception of one. My SAI NM M1A. I had SAI custom built it for me about 18 years ago. The rest are gone but I still have my old reliable M1A. I have literally thousands of rounds through it and will still easily shoot MOA or even slightly less with my rifle prefered handloads. I originally bought the rifle as a standard M1A, shot the crap out of it for a couple of years then sent it back to SAI for the national match upgrade for a whopping $525 back in 1993. And they did a spectacular job. All other MBR's pale in comparison. It just has a feel that no other can match. It stands head and shoulders above the rest for accuracy. It's easy on brass. I have reloaded the same bras 6 and 7 times without annealing. One time I had a case separate and had to use a broken shell extractor. That was after several loadings. Low recoil. Super sights, even the standard sights are a whole level above the rest. It's never jammed and never failed to go bang.
The second photo is looking through the 2nd Gen Springfield scope at the "gong". The gong is the top 18" of an acytelene tank suspended by chain at 600 yrds. The day I took that photo I hit that gong 27 out of 30 tried and 14 times in a row. Not to bad I'd say. The rest are just wanna be's. The M1A is the real deal. If one is to spend big money on a MBR there simply is no other choice, IMHO