What was the RKBA/GUN climate like in 1994?

Status
Not open for further replies.

eazyrider

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
303
Location
Houston, TX
I was 10 years old in 1994, politics were the furthest thing from my mind. What I want to know specifically is what the gun control climate was like. I saw a report that said that in the early 90's 70% of Americans supported stricter gun laws and now only 40%, thank God, do. So take me back in time. Also, in say 1993 was it easier or harder to buy a gun? Were AR's and AK's readily available. Were they on the cover of every magazine? How powerful was the NRA then? What were the "hot" guns?


I would also like all posters to answer this specific question. Did the 1994 AWB hurt the anti's in the long run? Basically did that ludicrous bill become our Alamo? Even though I was not affected by it, I have researched it and I must say it is my Alamo, I believe that bill is where the term "slippery slope" came from, at least for us.

[MODERATOR NOTE: We DON'T do politics. Keep all comments directed at GUN and RKBA issues. "Liberal -vs.- Conservative" and "Republican -vs.- Democrat" will get this thread shut down fast. Thanks.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I remember the buying frenzy fools went on for high capacity mags when they Brady Bill was implemented. People were paying upwards of 100 bucks for certain mags. One guy I work with paid 70 bucks for a plastic 30 rd mag for a Ruger 10/22 and was proud of it. I had bought one a couple of years earlier at Walmart for less than 15 bucks.
 
Back then we had a 5 day waiting period. The AWB was called the Brady Bill after a republican staffer who was injured in an attempt on Regan. The wife became the spokesman and he became the poster child for banning guns. The legislation was very much argued in public about stocks, flash hiders, and magazine size. There was a run in the gun stores much like we have seen over the last 2.5 years. After the bill was signed into law the effect was no effect except to limit ownership and IMHO strengthen the NRA. Back then most women had stayed away from guns. I think the attention got more women involved with guns. Ultimately I believe that acceptance of firearms by women has been the reason for widespread acceptance of firearms across the country. I further believe that the lack of success by TSA in the airports and on the border has lead to a inherent understanding that we need to be responsible for our own safety.
 
The AWB DID cripple the antis. By Clinton's own admission Gore lost 5 states because of the 1994 ban so yes the ban was devastating to the antis.

As far as the NRA's position on assault weapons and other "hot guns" thats still a matter of concern and aggravation for me. In all honesty the NRA has gotten better about defending the rights of the assault weapons but they still have a ways to go. Takes time to change an organization's ways.

As far as availability it depends on which guns you are talking about. For us AK enthusiasts things were looking to get better and then the barrel ban hit hard. During the ban I watched AKS74U kits drop from $700 to $200 only to skyrocket after the barrel ban. Couldn't have the folding stocks and removable brakes but that could be worked around. AR15s are better today in the aspect of magazines and stocks. Oddly the pricing on ARs did not drop as one would have hoped but then again the AR15 is the #1 sought after rifle in this country.
 
The AWB hurt the anti gunners. The IT boom helped. Now people could get real information, like when they ask why anyone needs an assualt weapon, you ask what is an assault weapon?

The AR did not have the capabilities it does now. So when you ask what good is it for, today its great for so much, look at what Remmington sells.

Also many before the ban many thought and assault weapon was a full automatic. What a shock when they find out.

Today people understand that its easy to expand a law once its in place. So its now a bad issue. Look at the AWB, once they realized it didnt do anything they just had to expand it to cover anything

Information hurt the anti gunners. look at teflon bullets. they are banned because......?
 
Further unfortunatly many police departments are viewed as Tax and Fee not Protect and Serve.

Because gun ownership is so widespread today we have not seen huge increases in crime I would have expected during the poor economic times. Also I believe the segment of society which fears the government is more widespread today. People have seen republicans and Democrats take away our individual rights for the "greater good". Back then the general consensus was that the government promoted freedoms. Waco Randy Weaver TSA events in Mexico health care etc has damaged these beliefs. So now we have the tea party and portions of the silent majority which have become very outspoken.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top