Aftermath
Member
Something anti ccw people seem to use as a point against carry is that if you end up using your weapon on an attacker, police responding are not going to know that you are the "good guy".
I am all for constitutional open and conceal carry but I am wondering how the "good guy" and "bad guy" can be determined by someone who did not see the whole incident.
Of course unlikely, but say a bad guy begins firing on others around you and you shoot him: what will another ccw guy do if he did not see the original shooter (bad guy) and he looks and sees you firing? What about a policeman arriving at the scene?
What about you guys that carry here? If you hear gunfire and run for cover ( hearing the shots not seeing it happen ) and then someone nearby begins firing, how would you know that is not the same presumably bad guy or his accomplice?
Don't think I am against the rkba but I am curious of peoples thoughts on this.
I am all for constitutional open and conceal carry but I am wondering how the "good guy" and "bad guy" can be determined by someone who did not see the whole incident.
Of course unlikely, but say a bad guy begins firing on others around you and you shoot him: what will another ccw guy do if he did not see the original shooter (bad guy) and he looks and sees you firing? What about a policeman arriving at the scene?
What about you guys that carry here? If you hear gunfire and run for cover ( hearing the shots not seeing it happen ) and then someone nearby begins firing, how would you know that is not the same presumably bad guy or his accomplice?
Don't think I am against the rkba but I am curious of peoples thoughts on this.