I also agree with post #2, in that you really need data published by the bullet companies and/or the powder companies. The more data you have, the more you can compare loads between sources. I don't typically EVER take just one source and go with it, as there could be something as simple as a typo that could ruin or nearly ruin a perfectly good gun - not to mention, possibly injure or kill the shooter.
With the internet, I find that I can find all kinds of load information from the different bullet companies and from the powder companies. I also have about six reloading manuals for various bullets (Speer, Barnes, Hornady, etc).
You want to begin reloading at 10% below maximum or at the publication's starting load, then load up in increments. There are various ways to accomplish the incremental loading which I won't get into. I will, however, state that, you should be methodical about everything, keep everything well-sorted and well-labeled and write down everything! You certainly do not want to spend all the time working up a load, bringing the targets all home from all the variations on that load but forget which load it was that put five bullet holes into one ragged hole at 100 yards!
Personally, I use a Chronograph, so not only do I write on every target the exact load, the date, whether windy or still, the temperature but also the speed in FPS of the projectile. I also make notations about any excessive recoil, or calm-feeling loads. If I have two identical targets and one hurts to shoot and the other is comfortable to shoot, I will go with the comfortable load over the sledgehammer load to help save my body and the gun. If you happen to shoot a game animal in a vital spot, it won't matter whether the bullet was traveling at 1,874 FPS or 2,020 FPS! The animal will drop with either load. If you think you might take a shot and have to track the animal, then don't take that shot as it is an inhumane shot that could cause the animal to live for three or more days while dying a slow, painful death.