Is it "taking a chance" with a new design?

Depends on the gun

Sometimes the manufacturer misses something, sometimes they ignore an incompatibility with an accessory, sometimes a materials issue doesn't become known until a few thousand rounds in on some guns, and the one the maker blasted a pallet of ammo through didn't have that minor flaw.

If I'm getting an example of a new design, I test the crap out of it and don't put it in serious service (CC/defense/etc) until I'm satisfied with it. The same applies to all guns, I'm just more thorough with new designs.

I also dont buy the first year or two on vehicles or any other big ticket item , sounds like good advice to me.
I also understand the gotta have one of those aspect as I often suffer the same ailment but I am learning to keep it at bay.
Luck
T

I'm with your brother. I never buy a new car or gun during the first year of production.

Are you a gambling man?

Buying first production anything usually heightens the risk of fail.

Wise words. Never buy the first iteration of anything.
These days, bug testing is done by consumers.
Manufacturers are in a rush to get a new product to market.

Based on SIG's P238 if you will be upset about potentially having to send it back for repair, I'd strongly suggest waiting.

Reputable companies will pay the shipping if you get one that doesn't work and will make it right eventually. If you like being and "early adopter" and being among the first to play with a new toy, go for it! And tell us how it works out.

I've "rolled the dice" on 3 handguns & 1 car, buying the first of a new model.

Ruger SR9: Gun recalled due to possible firing when dropped. They sent a prepaid box, which I returned with the gun and they returned the gun with a new trigger mechanism. The gun worked fine before & after, and they sent me an additional magazine & a hat. Impact to me was minimal as I could do without it a few days.

Colt New Agent: Gun recalled due to recoil spring issues. Again, a box was sent to me and sending it in & getting back was trivial. They fixed whatever the problem was, and they also replaced the plunger spring/tube as they felt it was too tight (I thought it was too but didn't mention it). Gun has always worked great, both before/after.

Boberg XR9-S: Some people had problems with light primer strikes so they sent me a new spring... Then later they sent another spring, because the first increased the trigger pull enough that some people didn't like it. I haven't had any issues so I just have extra springs in case I need them.

1995 Chevy Blazer: This was a brand new model, completely changed from previous generation Blazers. This gamble turned out pretty good as we had no problems/major repairs or even minor repairs until the engine grenaded at 173k miles. Most of those miles were very short trips in-town or to work (3-4 miles from start to stop), so the truck barely even got warmed up. I consider the engine life pretty good for that abuse.

As others have noted, you are taking a risk with first models of things and history definitely indicates that there are often issues... But if you buy from a reputable company such as Ruger, Colt, S&W, etc. they will stand by their products and make it right.

There are a few parts for the FI available, but you'll probably have to search the internet for some. Or you could just buy a whole new gun on Gunbroker.

FI Parts: http://www.gunpartscorp.com/catalog/Products.aspx?catid=2126

I'd like to point out that while often with new designs of anything, there is more risk of it having a few bugs to work out, SOMEBODY needs to buy them or they will be discontinued whether they work or not.

IMO if you want something that's relatively new, can afford it, and it comes from a company you trust to both put out a decent product with very limited chance of serious failure as well as make it right if there is a problem then GET IT.

The last thing I would want is to pass on a good design just because it's new and wind up with only a few runs being made due to low sales, thus making it hard to find and more pricey than originally intended.

I'd like to point out that while often with new designs of anything, there is more risk of it having a few bugs to work out, SOMEBODY needs to buy them or they will be discontinued whether they work or not.

Click to expand...

Nope. There is sufficient technology and failure testing that needs to take place at the factory.
This is the responsibility of all manufacturers.

Two words. Kel-Tec.

Orion. i'm a sig nut. I own several and I'm on a sig board. Everyone who owns a p238 with the new mag loves them. They are spoken of as soft and reliable shooters.

Two words. Kel-Tec.

Click to expand...

Sure if you like returning guns for repair, two of my six Kel-Tecs have had to go back, one more then once. All were out well past a year before I got them.

Most guns are almost perfected from the time of the release, so I would not worry about any bugs or small problems. Usally a gun company will put it through intense torture and testing; before shelfing it. Especially a gun company such as Sig, just look at the success of the Sig P226, P228, and the P229. If there is anything you find to be a problem, just send it in to Sig for a fix-up, you should get the problem resolved for free. Also a little range testing wouldn't hurt to check if it fits your specs. After all if you need it, a smooth running handgun could be the difference between life or death. So my final answer is Yes, to go out and get it......... Unless it's a High Point.

I bought a kel-tec in 9mm four years ago because my wife liked it so it was going to be her CC gun. With that being said I was going to shoot the heck out of it to make sure it was up to par, 60 or so rounds into it the take down pin sheared the head off and the slide came totally off when recoiling. I'm done being a beta tester.

This is a Sig we are talking about so even in the off chance you end up with one with issues the company is solid and should treat you well.

Sure if you like returning guns for repair, two of my six Kel-Tecs have had to go back, one more then once. All were out well past a year before I got them.

Click to expand...

I was trying to imply that Kel-Tec has a tendency to use buyers as testers.

Everybody has to get something brand new a least once or twice in their life

Are you a gambling man?

Buying first production anything usually heightens the risk of fail.

Click to expand...

That is why it is gambling. It can go both ways. Sometimes 1st year production is best and quality goes down from there. I'd much rather own a 1st year production Mustang, Smith & Wesson 27, Winchester 94, Colt SAA, Colt 1911, or Chevy Z-28 than current production versions of the same.