300yard gun

Status
Not open for further replies.
A 300 yard rifle is easy. A good 300 yard real world, not shooting from a bench , shooter that is harder to find.

A perfect rifle would be a bolt action chambered for any of the following 260 Remington, 7-08, 308..... 25-06, 270, 280, 30-06..... any of the major brands will do, I prefer Savage,

Manly find a gun you like.

A good 3x9x40 scope and you are done.
 
Last edited:
300

300 yards offhand is not that hard......??? At A ten inch zone on a whitetail?
I beg to disagree.....that is mighty fine shooting indeed. Fine enough that it is beyond the skills of most hunters who will be or are in the woods this year.
Pets
 
Fine enough that it is beyond the skills of most hunters who will be or are in the woods this year.
That's a pretty low standard though. For a rifleman that practices with his chosen firearm, it's a doable shot. For the typical hunter that takes his deer rifle out of the closet the day before the season opens, maybe takes it to the range to make sure it's zeroed, and might fire a handful of shots during the season (depending on how many days he goes hunting and the local rules on tags), that would be an impossible shot. Regardless of skill level, a "hunter" worthy of the title isn't going to take that shot offhand if he's got any other option.
 
300 yards offhand
What? Offhand? No, that would be quite tough indeed. I'd go far enough out on a limb to say that "no one" should be trying that on game. 300 yards well rested, on a bipod, sandbag, prone, or out of a blind or stand? Yeah, that's certainly doable.
 
Im going with either the .308 or 300. Definitely want weathershied of some sort, mostly for whitetail hunting, may shoot a lot for practice since ammo is cheap for it. Anybody have experience or recommendations for guns with weathershield of some sort?

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
 
What's weathershield?

EDIT: Oh, that's T/C's version of a corrosion-proof finish. Ok. I'd think most manufacturer's have some version of that, or offer a matte stainless version for "extreme" weather.

.308 "or .300"? .300 isn't going to be all that cheap, or much fun to practice with, and sure excessive on any deer at only 300 yds.


.308 is just fine.
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with the 308,or any one of dozens of other calibers that will get the job done at 300 yards.Some of the flatter shooting rounds can actually be sighted in for 300 and still not be any more than 3 inches high at 100.I've killed a good number of deer at 300 and beyond,but it takes a rifle you are used to,a good scope and a rest of some sort and a lot of practice.
 
My savage in 308 has killed deer up to 350.... I've always been partial to savages. They are cheap, they work, and they are accurate as anything.. Also the weatherby's aren't bad. You'd be hard pressed to find something both cheaper and better for the price than those two.


Posted from Thehighroad.org App for Android
 
What? Offhand? No, that would be quite tough indeed. I'd go far enough out on a limb to say that "no one" should be trying that on game.
Considering that it's essentially holding the "10 ring" on a High Power target for the offhand stage (3.5 MOA) it's hardly impossible. The caveat is that one has to be a shooter compared to someone that just owns a rifle that they take hunting. The other difference is that the person most capable of that shot probably isn't going to take it while the person least capable...well that's probably a different story.
 
Considering that it's essentially holding the "10 ring" on a High Power target for the offhand stage (3.5 MOA) it's hardly impossible. The caveat is that one has to be a shooter compared to someone that just owns a rifle that they take hunting. The other difference is that the person most capable of that shot probably isn't going to take it while the person least capable...well that's probably a different story.
Of course. But High Power is shot under pretty specific conditions, using optimized target shooting equipment and kit, and a very specific high-definition target. Not hunting clothes and a Remington/Tikka/Savage/Winchester/etc. hunting rifle, standing in a pasture at dawn/dusk after hiking three miles, and shooting at a movable brown object against a brown background an unknown true distance away etc., etc.

I'm sure it's been done, but as you say, the guys most likely to be able to pull off that shot are probably those who understand best why they shouldn't be trying that shot at a living creature.
 
I like my Rem 700 SPS DM. Mine is in 7mm Rem Mag because I wanted a gun for deer and elk. For a dedicated deer gun, I'd go .243, 7mm-08, or .308 win. They are all developed from the same cartridge and the choice among them would depend on what else you want to do with the gun and whether or not you want to reload. All have a wide variety of factory ammo available.
 
I'm not sure I see the productivity in debating the skill needed to make a clean kill on a deer at 300 yards. That's in real life, is up to the OP and none of us are going to be there to help him practice or hunt. He asked for a rifle capable of doing the job and got lots of good advice so the rest is up to him.

To me shooting 300 yards is a challenge to those who have tried it, easy to those who haven't and since most rifles are capable of it not really an equipment related issue (or easy fix). My only advice is don't go overboard on the cartridge. There is long range and then there is "longer than people typically shoot". A short action cartridge like 7mm-08 or .308 will save wear on the shoulder of the shooter.
 
Last edited:
Pete D. said:
300 yards offhand is not that hard......??? At A ten inch zone on a whitetail?
I beg to disagree.....

Exactly!! When you consider that the 300 yard SR-3 target used in NRA High Power has a 7" ten ring (2.3 MOA) and then consider that all shooting at the 300 yard line is PRONE, you have to wonder about the real-world experience of some here. :rolleyes:
 
If the deer is 300 + yards away the hunter should be able to find some type of supported position to shoot from. Prone, using a day-pack as rest makes 300 yards do able.

Hunting is about stalking game, the goal of a stalk is to get into a position to be able to cleaning kill the game. Get closer.
 
I'm surprised at you guys. I've seen lots of people that can make that 300 yard shot off hand. Would I try it on a live animal? Most likely not because there is a chance of missing and I don't take shots at anything that I might miss. But it certainly can be done and if I was starving or something you can bet I'd take that shot.

I can shoot my Savage 110 and hit a 10" target at 300 yards off hand probably 90% of the time. And I'm no great shot. I've seen lots of people that shoot better than I do. It is true that most people I know wouldn't take that shot because it just isn't needed where I live. There's always some place to rest a rifle even if it's just holding it against the side of a tree. And, again, not using a scope allows a person to hold a rifle more steady. Sure you have to be able to see your target and you have to be able to shoot without a scope. And I wouldn't go hunt anything without practicing first. I would think that goes without saynig. I guess that's just the way I was raised where no one ever shoots at anything live unless they have their skills down. It's easy enough to master those skills IMO. It just takes the time to do it and if you hunt without doing it then you're taking a chance on a cruel, non-life taking shot. And I'm not just talking about shooting off a rest and calling that practice. You need to practice off hand shots. I guess I just assume people do that before they go hunting. AFAIK everyone in my area gets in a good bit of practice before trying to harvest a deer.

I think the reason a lot of folks don't realize that 300 yard, off hand shot is fairly easy is that everyone is addicted to scopes these days. When I was a kid it was very rare to see a scope on a deer rifle. People hunted with 30-30's and they didn't use scopes. Now you can barely find a rifle that even has iron sights. It makes practicing hard. Try aiming your hunting rifle without the scope on it and see how much easier it is to hold the sights on a target. If you practice shooting at something where you can see where your hitting without needing a scope then you will be able to figure out how to hit a shot like that pretty quickly IMO. I've seen lots of people do it.

I guess I have more faith in you guys than most people. I believe you can do it because I've seen people do it often. They would generally practice at around 300 yards on our farm because that's the longest open space we had. They did not take shots n animals at that distance though. In fact they rarely even got a shot at a whitetail and they wouldn't risk wounding one of the few bucks in the area on a long shot.

1858 said:
you have to wonder about the real-world experience of some here

If I couldn't hit a 7" ten ring at 300 yards from the prone position I'd quit shooting. Obviously no one would hit it every time. But you seem to have left out that much of that 300 yard NRA shooting is rapid fire.

You also seem to like following me around to contradict what I say. Have you noticed how often people hit those 10 rings in those competitions? And who said you needed to hit a 7" area to kill a deer? BTW is that target you are talking about the rapid fire target they use for 300 yards? Why don't you try learning to shoot instead of swearing that no one else can because you can't? I've seen kids make the shots you're saying can't be made.

Personally I don't like to shoot anything off hand if I can help it these days because of a back injury. But I can still do it if I try. I could probably show you how to do it too 1858. Wouldn't you rather learn something than slam others because they already know it? Again I'm just an average shooter but I know what can be done with a rifle and some practice.
 
Last edited:
Tigersfan;

Here's another vote for the 6.5X55mm Swedish Mauser. It's available on several different platforms, the Tikka T3 being an excellent one. Winchester has also produced the model 70 in that caliber, though I don't know if their current catalog lists it. And CZ will sell you one too. The CZ is only in wood/blue I think, but does have the single-set trigger which many people find they really like.

The 6.5 will give you mild recoil, and truly outstanding downrange ballistics, particularly with the 140 grain bullets. And it's known to be exceptionally accurate, given that all due diligence is performed.

900F
 
I am more interested in what u guys think of the models of guns or if you have bought one I mentioned recently. I want a real good quality gun, I looked at remingtons a few months ago and all the bolts/actions were probably the worst I've ever felt, not even close to smooth. haven't bought a gun in ten years. Obviously about every gun can shoot 300 yards.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
 
T/C would not be on my short list.....Tikka is a good suggestion, most of the others are good too. Depends on your budget really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top