It seems to me that there is a tricky legal point on "NO GUNS" or equivalent signs.
If a business puts up a "no guns" sign and does not enforce it (how?) and someone comes in with a gun and kills or injures someone on the premises, is the business liable? They can't claim they didn't consider the possibility of such an event because their sign clearly says they did. Yet, by taking no steps to enforce their rule (by metal detectors, armed guards, etc.) they accept responsibility if the sign is ignored and are liable for what happens.
If they post no signs, then they can claim that their customers have always been peaceful and they have no liabililty for an unlikely and unforeseeable occurrence.
Jim
If a business puts up a "no guns" sign and does not enforce it (how?) and someone comes in with a gun and kills or injures someone on the premises, is the business liable? They can't claim they didn't consider the possibility of such an event because their sign clearly says they did. Yet, by taking no steps to enforce their rule (by metal detectors, armed guards, etc.) they accept responsibility if the sign is ignored and are liable for what happens.
If they post no signs, then they can claim that their customers have always been peaceful and they have no liabililty for an unlikely and unforeseeable occurrence.
Jim