9mm snubbies

Status
Not open for further replies.
David,

The film canisister was always faster than the speed strip every day for me for whatever reason. About half the time I lost one round using the film canister, but always was able to close the revolver and start shooting faster than trying to load five or even four from the speed strip.

Still a speed loader, even an HKS twist type was faster and more reliable than either......and a second revolver faster and more reliable still.

I played with speed strips for a couple of years both red and black in color and pretty much abandoned them.

FOr a bit I used a six shot strip with the third hole empty making it easier to load two with out dislodging one twice. My biggest problem with a speed strip was one still needs something to carry it in unless one did not mind the ocassional round falling out in the pocket or getting caught on removal from the pocket. I wished they made a five shot speed strip with the rounds set so two are close for double loading at once then a space two more and a space and the fifth round out by itself. Less chance of stripping off rounds un wanted that way.

Reloads for speed where not a high priority for me most of the time and I often carried an ammo wallet, next slowest thing to standard belt loops one side or the other.

My favorite game revolver of what I have is a 1917 as I like the moon clips, thought a five shot nine with a full moon might be interesting.

Not interested in arguing though, certainly not on the high road.......

-kBob
 
WC145- thanks for the info. That makes going down that road a little more affordable.

Gary, that's a very good point, and I'll certainly take your advice should I go that route.

Weblance, thanks for the link. Your review was quite helpful.

Since the 905 can be shot without the moon clip, I'll probably carry my reload in a speed strip. I'm not concerned with a second reload.
 
The film canisister was always faster than the speed strip every day for me for whatever reason.

Too bad the YouTube video of Massad Ayoob demonstrating the speed strip reload wasn't available to you at the time. The technique shown is solid.

There are now "Quick Strips" that hold 5, 6, 7 and 8 cartridges. You could leave one or two cells empty to allow a better hold, or stagger the rounds as you suggest.
 
Not only was there no you tube 20 some years ago, but Massad Ayoob did not teach me anything unusual about speed strips in his LFI-1 class back then, except the load two at a time and the skip number 3 hole technique on a six shot for a five shot revolver. He complained mightily about the fact that under pressure I slipped back into Cooper-isms with the autos though.

His 2 1/2 inch tricked out python was a joy to shoot. BUt even with a bobbed barrel the python is a lot of six shot .357 to conceal. Still not sure how the skinny LFA did so so well......

-kBob
 
He apparently has updated his speedstrip technique somewhat.

What's important is that good techniques are found, mastered and updated if necessary.
 
I think it's impossible to tell if Charter Arms has worked out the quality problems with their rimless revolver in 9mm because they only seem to make a few revolvers a month.

I'd be surprised if they make more than one 9mm PITBULL in a week.

As leary as I am of Taurus, I've only hear good things about the 905 - the "stellar" clips are another matter, but you can buy moon clips from other makers now. Just accept that the Taurus stellar clips are going to be a problem. For people who just want a 9mm revolver(not a snubbie) CzechPoint USA will be importing the 3" Alfa Proj revolvers in September - the 9231:

http://www.czechpoint-usa.com/products/revolvers/9-mm-luger/czechpoint-9231-9mm-para/

attachment.php
Ohhhh yeah! I want it!
 
Didn't read every comment so someone might have suggested already. Get a .357 and shoot 38+ P. A 357 is just a hot 38 special, 38 special +P is somewhere between the 2.
 
Good point... I guess I figured they would since there's been so much talk of a speed strip. Maybe one made for a smaller caliber wood work?

I mean, there is a little bit of rim to grab on to.
 
There is no reason a speed strip could not be designed to work with 9mm. I doubt that a 38/357 one would, though.

I was pretty interested in a 9mm revolver until the latest ammo scare. Now I'm kind of glad that I'm not stuck with 9mm only. I'm not going to consolidate anytime soon now.

One huge benefit to a 9mm revolver would be a shorter frame/cylinder - it looks like that's not the case in any of them I've seen so far.

My ideal 9mm revolver would be scandium frame 3" barrel and a 6 shot cylinder as close to a J frame in size as possible.

So far, though I'm pretty happy with 38 +p with either the gold dot short barrel (scarce) or the 158gLSWCHP.
 
There is no reason a speed strip could not be designed to work with 9mm. I doubt that a 38/357 one would, though.

There's a gun shop on my route while running errands tomorrow. I think I'll stop in and see if they'll let me test this. And see if they offer any smaller caliber speed strips if a .38/.357 speed strip won't work.

Hey, maybe I'll get lucky and they'll have something in the gun case for me :)!
 
Maybe one made for a smaller caliber wood work?
I'm thinking the problem is mostly lack of a rim to hold it in place. I don't know if the short little rim of the 9mm could be made to work. (Oops! I see you already addressed that.)
One huge benefit to a 9mm revolver would be a shorter frame/cylinder - it looks like that's not the case in any of them I've seen so far.
I thought the Taurus 905, or at east one version of it did have a shorter cylinder and frame scaled to the 9mm cartridge. Am I imagining that?
 
Last edited:
The main allure of a 9mm revolver is the speed of a moonclip reload.

To purposely negate that is..........interesting.
 
I thought the Taurus 905, or at east one version of it did have a shorter cylinder and frame scaled to the 9mm cartridge. Am I imagining that?

They shortened the cylinder on their .380 revolver, not so much on their 9mm
 
To purposely negate that is..........interesting.

Yeah, but carrying the extra moon clip might be troublesome. I know Del Fatti makes a holder for them, but (I admit, I haven't really looked) finding one may be hard, and getting on the list for a new one if he doesn't have any stocked (can't imagine he does) will be a long wait.

But, if I can find one, and find a speed strip able to hold the 9mm, I'll try both. Speed strips are relatively inexpensive, so I won't be losing out on much if it doesn't work out. I can always sell the moon clip holder if it doesn't work out.
 
They shortened the cylinder on their .380 revolver, not so much on their 9mm
Taurus made a version called the 905 Instant Backup, it had a shorter cylinder and frame, I had a blued one. Must not have been popular, it was short lived.
 
Taurus made a version called the 905 Instant Backup, it had a shorter cylinder and frame, I had a blued one. Must not have been popular, it was short lived.

Maybe there were enough cases of "flash gap thumb shred" to make them reconsider that option.
 
Maybe there were enough cases of "flash gap thumb shred" to make them reconsider that option.
Now there's a thought I had not considered. Ouch! As was mentioned, sometimes learning from others is so much better than learning everything through personal experience.
 
Every time I get in the mood to sell my 905, I find a thread like this one and feel glad that I still have it. I would not want a lighter frame as 9mm packs a pretty good punch (more than my model 36 and Colt Cobra in .38 sp). Mine has the optional grip from Taraus that is a longer than the standard one. This grip takes some of the bite out of the recoil. When I carry it, it's IWB in Desantis leather. My loaded stellar clips are in an old pill bottle.

Grapevine
 
Maybe there were enough cases of "flash gap thumb shred" to make them reconsider that option.
I've never had such an issue with any revolver, including the 905IB. Of course, I'm smart enough to keep my thumb away from the cylinder face when shooting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top