Kansas HB2473 - preemption and a few other things
This passed with a 34 to 2 vote this morning
Does not NY already have a complete registry linked to a permit or is that just parts of the state? I thought the guns you have must be on your permit so what would this accomplish?New York
S07113 would require any firearm made by a 3D printer to have a serial number and be registered with the state police
Does not NY already have a complete registry linked to a permit or is that just parts of the state? I thought the guns you have must be on your permit so what would this accomplish?
License: amendment. Elsewhere than in the city of New York, a person licensed to carry or possess a pistol or revolver may apply at any time to his or her licensing officer for amendment of his or her license to include one or more such weapons or to cancel weapons held under license. If granted, a record of the amendment describing the weapons involved shall be filed by the licensing officer in the executive department, division of state police, Albany. The superintendent of state police may authorize that such amendment be completed and transmitted to the state police in electronic form. Notification of any change of residence shall be made in writing by any licensee within ten days after such change occurs, and a record of such change shall be inscribed by such licensee on the reverse side of his or her license. Elsewhere than in the city of New York, and in the counties of Nassau and Suffolk, such notification shall be made to the executive department, division of state police, Albany, and in the city of New York to the police commissioner of that city, and in the county of Nassau to the police commissioner of that county, and in the county of Suffolk to the licensing officer of that county, who shall, within ten days after such notification shall be received by him or her, give notice in writing of such change to the executive department, division of state police, at Albany.
That is an incorrect assessment.dc dalton said:Colorado SB135. This bill strikes all the language of state law section 12-27-101, 'Purchase of Firearms in contiguous States' adding even more restraints on law abiding business and citizens.
> "The gun lobby likes to prevent people who believe in sensible gun
> laws from having a say in protecting their own communities," Lowry
> said. "It's cynical, and it's dangerous public policy."
Ah okay, misinterpreted that oneThat is an incorrect assessment.
The Bill repealed existing law limiting the sale by a dealer in Colorado of long guns to non-residents to only non-residents of contiguous States. But under federal law (18 USC 922(b)(3)), a dealer may transfer a long gun to a resident of any State as long as the laws of both States are complied with.
The Bill thus removes a restraint. It doesn't add one.
New federal bill came in today. It has no text yet but it is sponsored by Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana.
The title is 'To modify the definition of "antique firearm"'
Should be interesting to see what this one is about once the full text comes in.
Yes, the text came in the day after I posted it and it does say the change would be moving the year to 1913According to GovTrack, the text is:
A BILL
To modify the definition of antique firearm.
1.Amendment to title 18, United States Code Section 921(a)(16)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 1898 and inserting 1913.
2.Amendment to Internal Revenue Code of 1986 Subsection (g) of section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 1898 each place it appears and inserting 1913.
This would seem to redefine antique firearms as those made prior to 1913 instead of as it is currently, 1898, no?
That's what we do!I dont have anything useful to add but thank you for putting this thread together. Im so happy that I will be moving from New Jersey to Oklahoma!