We have annual commission meetings, this is when hunters and activists alike make their propositions and arguments. And if enough of you make your proposals, and then present them with an intelligent and well prepared argument, things can change, we've seen some very positive changes in my state using this approach. You don't necessarily have to have a biologist or other experts assessment, that aspect is often performed in advance by the G&F people and other concerned parties when the required annual herd counts and well being assessments are performed. So just being there to state your proposal with your fellow hunters can be enough to get them to take notice, and with a sincere approach.
It also helps immensely when well known and respected outfitters are willing to present the positive impact such changes can have by increasing sales of tags , licenses. And also, all the other positive economic impacts that can be inspired by hunters spending more money in the communities during each season. People tend to take more interest when we start talking money, so by doing a bit of research as to how much other states have benefited by making / changing various aspects of hunt regulations can be very useful also.
GS
