1903 Sporter in 375 Mag

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
1,260
Location
Virginia
I recently purchased a 1903 sporter rifle that is chambered in some 375 Mag. Initially the rifle was sold as being chambered in 375 H&H Magnum (which was a fair assumption given the rifle's age) but I tried to run some 375 H&H Mag snap caps through the rifle, but had trouble fully closing the bolt on the round. I don't yet have any 375 H&H Mag ammo to try in the rifle (to verify that the snap caps aren't ill sized) but I'm wondering if it might possibly be a different 375 Magnum round than the H&H.

My first guess would be 375 Weatherby Magnum (although I thought you should be able to chamber a 375 H&H in a 375 weatherby) but does anyone know a similar round which could be the possible caliber? If the rifle really is chambered in 375 Weatherby, is it possible to have it re-chambered to 375 H&H Mag (which is much more commonly available and cheaper) or would it require a rebarrel?

Here's a picture of the action for those of you who enjoy some big bore, safari-style sporters!
OzjazPZ.jpg
1rSeiFX.jpg
 
Last edited:
.375 H&H can be chambered/fired in .375 Weatherby. Never saw a .375 h&h on a 1903 Springfield the action and mag are to short. Not to say it can't be done but I wonder if you don't have a .375-06.
 
The bolt face seems to fit the belted mag well and is too large for a .30-06 case. Strangely, the snap caps seem to feed perfectly and will actually extract and eject. The bolt just barely won't close (it seems to rotate about 10-15 degrees instead of the full 90 degree for full closure)...in fact it seems to be almost fully close but I simply can't get the bolt handle to fully rotate.
 
Pressure for the 375 H&H exceeds max SAAMI pressure for the 30-03 and 30-06 the 03 was built for. Date of manufacture would also be of interest given that some people believe poor heat treatment in early models make them unsafe for use with the 30-06. I personally would be squeamish about a Belted Magnum in an 03 action. If a 375 H&H and not closing on snap caps, I'd want to check head spacing too...
 
OPs RA 417,688 is out of the bad heat treat range.
Robs .375 Win idea may be right. That would explain the oversize bolt face.
 
a chamber cast may be in order. in the 40-50,s a lot of wildcats were made up useing large cases. eastbank.
 
Was 375 Winchester ever referred to as 375 Magnum (the barrel is stamped 375 Magnum)? I'm thinking that a chamber cast will probably be the only way to know for sure.

It seems like the action is set up perfectly for 375 H&H as the snap caps feed perfectly in and out of the camber (excepting the last little bit of lock up). You can see from the below picture that the controlled feed is working perfectly.
72FuV42.jpg

Here's how the rifle looks closed on an empty chamber:
aXrpEVq.jpg

And here is it at the maximum I can close the bolt with a snap cap in:
98qWcQY.jpg

It doesn't seem like the bolt really has any more room to close towards the breech, but it simply won't rotate all the way down to fully closed.

I guess at this point, the only thing I can think is that it must be some sort of wildcat based on the 375 H&H. I'll probably have to a chamber casting to figure out what it is for sure. If it turns out to be a wildcat, I'll probably try to look into having it re-chambered for either Weatherby or H&H. Does anyone know of a good place to have that done or can most gunsmiths accomplish such a job?
 
.375 Winchester is kind of a souped up .38-55 Marlin/Ballard. No possible connection.

.375 Weatherby is same head diameter and length as a .375 H&H with less taper and a steep shoulder. The chamber should swallow a H&H (and a live round fireform safely.)

You might have a .375 H&H that was chambered until it accepted a cartridge from a particular lot and your snap cap has a wider belt or a longer head to shoulder.


What is the rest of the marking on the barrel?
 
Thanks for all the replies, gents. It's a quandry. I may just go ahead and by some live 375 H&H and see how it works out.

Jim, here's a picture of the barrel markings. It's fairly vague but the makers were apparently popular in northern CA in the 50s/60s.
lmsu3Kt.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top