Shot Show: RCBS 7 station Pro Chucker Progressive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dang, Aluminum? Seriously?

Yuck.

I like my cast iron/steel Pro2000. I don't mind the 40 odd lbs weigh when I am lugging it around to swap presses. Yes I know you can make Aluminum as strong as needed, but over time I worry about brittle cracks. Also I magnet a bunch of things to my proess like lights so they won't work anymore.

The more and more I read about the 7 stage pro unit the more and more I feel I need to see one in person at Cabela's or Bass pro so I can really get a feel for it. Its not like my pro2000 that I bought sight unseen due to the APS strips and progressive nature.
 
All the popular presses are aluminum castings except the RCBS, which rarely even gets mentioned. If cast aluminum, top-of-the-line presses are breaking all over the planet, wouldn't we kinda know about it?
 
I can't fault your logic, but for the same reason I like blued steel revolvers and don't own an AR type gun, it is personal preference. Some folks love plastic guns and AR type guns. I like blued steel and wood. I just don't like aluminum tools and aluminum presses. I look at a reloading press as a long term investment and why buy something I don't like from the start?

I would be surprised if RCBS did not give a lifetime warantee on the system but at the end of the day, I take a bit of pride in keeping my workspace clean, my tools tuned up and working well, and I enjoy the heft cast iron and steel.

So personal biases and preferences make me not like aluminum for tools.
 
All the popular presses are aluminum castings except the RCBS, which rarely even gets mentioned. If cast aluminum, top-of-the-line presses are breaking all over the planet, wouldn't we kinda know about it?

http://www.dillonprecision.com/My_650_Arrived_Broken-98-11-2068.htm (Dillon 650)
http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=157392 (Dillon 550)
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202620 (Rock Chucker turns out to be an Alum. Partner press.)
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=630025 (Hornady AP)
http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/threads/hornady-lnl-ap-broken-drive-hub.124130/ (Hornady AP)
http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=42&t=405195 (Hornady AP)

Only if you choose to look will you know about it....somes just choose not to look. Google and see. The blue press picture in this thread, showing a broken casting is an example. Nobody seemed to care in the thread, I mean Dillon replaced it free of course. That isn't 1 of of million.....and I'm sure more break than are ever posted about. There are more examples you can google, some on Brian Enos.

It's great that Dillon no faults such breakage and just replaces them, but the user still has to deal with the stress and the down time. I can't find similar cast iron press breakage examples on Google.....please do look and if you find one post it.

Beyond all of that.....for reasons of their own, the press manufacturers are indeed going aluminum.......and then there is Lee who started it, and they suddenly starting making some cast iron stuff that hit the market running with popularity in the stratosphere! Even the Lee laughers don't laugh at those two presses.

Pete brings up the other point.....we like and buy what we perceive as best for us. That's why I bought a Pro 2000, and cast iron was only one part of the equation.....APS, simplicity, and quick caliber changes were other parts. My press is for a guy who hates to load and shoot 1000's of one thing, then repeat. That might have something to do with how my Saturdays are spent (NOT at competitions....I had enough of that, when I was younger, coaching baseball and riding motocross).

I see two possible outcomes of this:

1. Solid cast iron presses, like solid thick sheet metaled and framed cars are going the way of the Dodo bird. Eventually we won't have a choice from any company.

2. RCBS will make a major mistake with this aluminum press comparable to Pontiac, when they brought back the GTO in a blasphemous Australian blah car form, and had practically zero sales! Did that having anything to do with the company being shut down by GM? I'm thinking it did...along with other similar bone head decisions. Pontiac officials replied to un-customers that they weren't interested in "retro" designs....... what, like Camaro, Charger, Mustang? :rolleyes:

RCBS Special 5 Aluminum press
index.php
 
Last edited:
To be fair, wasn't the discussion of breakage about someone who somehow needed to cam over the press? Was that really what the machine was designed for? The big caliber rifle stuff is done on rugged single stage presses, for the most part, right?

somes just choose not to look.

Why would I go looking for it? I am committed to the press I have and kinda pay attention to thread titles as they go by, mentioning problems of that type. I have seen that picture before. The caption says "RCBS Special 5". Even can't-get-no-respect Lee uses steel linkage in their cast presses.
 
Last edited:
GW makes a great series of points as usual.

Lets face it. The one thing reloading hundreds of thousands of rounds (literally) has taught me is that any "reasonable" tool can make great ammo in the hands of a dedicated user. This is why there are two flavors of red, blue and green presses. If you like blue or red or green then you tend to figure a way around the inherent limitations of the press you have for doing the reloading the way you want to.

So I went green and APS, cast iron, cheap and easy caliber changes were my reason over picking blue and at the time (2000) the only red was well simply put "no". I had already progressed past the point where I wanted better quality of tools.

I learned many decades ago from an engineer at Oldsmobile that there were huge quality differences in tools. He commented that my micrometer would not make a good c-clamp at Olds. But he also showed me that a good engineer could get nearly the same measurement out of my cheaper micrometer as he could out of his very expensive one. The key was the user and understanding the limits of the tool. The point he wanted to make is that better quality and generally more expensive tools make it easier to get the correct answer faster and more consistently.

So lets bring this back to the press at hand. The pro's for it are 7 stages which I would like over my 5 stage pro 2000. I would like to decap separate from size and neck expansion in rifle. I would also dispense independently of priming. I already seat and crimp separately so no big gain there.

The con's are (in no particular order): Aluminum frame, dies plates appear to come with powder measures attached, No APS priming, Primer tubes, etc.

The intangibles are: having to relearned a new press and work out its quirks.

Today, having never seen the press or read a review of someone I trusted, I am a bit skeptical. I am not badmouthing it, but I am taking a "wait and physically see" approach to the problem.

My concerns could be unfounded (they usually are) but given that I have the pro2000 working great. I have mounds and mounds of APS strips and I can still order CCI primers in APS strips, I think I am in a situation that I will wait and see. I figure the press is going to cost me with die plates around $1200 to get a few calibers. Right now that is worth about 40,000 primers @ $30/1000. I would rather order 40,000 small pistol primers than gamble on a press sight unseen today.

Back when I bought the pro2000 (2000) I just ordered it up from Natchez unseen, unreviewed and frankly just gambled that it was a good decision. It was but being a bit older and wiser now, I would investigate more carefully today.
 
one of the reasons I replaced my Dillon 550 with a Pro 2000 was that I broke the Aluminum crank on my 550 loading 7.62 Nato.
 
one of the reasons I replaced my Dillon 550 with a Pro 2000 was that I broke the Aluminum crank on my 550 loading 7.62 Nato.

Why did your use of the press on that caliber require so much force? What operation caused the press to bind up, while you stood on the crank? I would have eased up and checked for a problem, maybe addressing some issue on a single stage as a preliminary.

Since Dillon would have fixed it immediately, I wonder if you had it happen more than once, were too quick to consider it an inherent flaw, or just wanted to upgrade from the 550 to an auto indexing press.
 
Realgun, I was loading 7.62 Nato using a small base sizing die, several hundred rounds. When I contacted Dillon for parts they said it was a common failure when F.L.S. lots of rifle cartridges and recomended pre-sizing on a single stage press.

I have since loaded several thousand 7.62 on my Pro-2000, no problems and much less effort required. The Pro-2000 has much more leverage than a 550. Mt Pro-2000 is manual index like the 550, auto index option did not exist when I bought my press.
 
Use of an iron casting may be one reason why RCBS prices for progressive presses are not competitive and why the typical loader of mid to heavy rifle calibers uses a single stage for at least some of their operations. Coming back with not only an aluminum casting like the rest but also a 7th station makes RCBS worth considering now and likely gaining a recommendation more often.
 
Price was one of the things I looked at when I was in the market for a progressive. The 2 finalists were the Dillon 650 and the RCBS Pro 2000. I've already suggested why the Pro 2000 won me over.....simplicity, cast iron, quick caliber changes.....I didn't mention price but that was actually decisive for me. The 650 was not cheaper.....at all.

To make the 650 comparable in function, caliber-change-wise, one would want to have a quick change kit for each caliber. That means a separate powder measure for each, exactly the gripe heard in this thread about the Pro Chucker 7!! That's expensive, and not needed for a Pro 2000....so Pro 2k caliber changes were a lot cheaper and that was the straw that finished off the 650 in the running for me.

People think the stationary station on a Pro 2000 is somehow a disadvantage. For loading pistol, the ideal is using the powder die and powder thru expander on station 2, which frees the stationary station three for a lockout die. I buy a powder die and expander for each caliber's die plate, but not a whole new Powder measure.

For rifle I have a choice of charging on station 2 again using its own powder die, or I can use the stationary 3 and just change the mic settings. I prefer to seat rifle with a Gold Medal seater because it's super fast and seats them as straight and accurate as a straight line die. It has no crimp feature, but that's fine by me....I usually don't have a need to crimp a rifle cartridge.

BTW, I don't size rifle on the Pro 2000.....no point since I want to trim and prep the brass off press before I prime, charge and seat. My Rock Chucker does those honors. However............those who use an X-sizer do so without needing trimming or case prep on cases reloaded once already. For them the cast iron frame is a peace of mind advantage.
 
Last edited:
You keep moving the goal posts. I don't believe we were discussing the 650. You said you replaced a 550 with a Pro2000 manual index. Without a lot of options hung on it, the Pro2000 without auto-indexing is comparable to a 550, not a 650. One more station, 5 instead of 4, is not the whole story, when 4 was previously 'enough".

I am happy for you that you are satisfied with RCBS in a press, but let's not make this a press color war. Comparisons should be fair, feature for feature. That said, cast iron may be nice or even essential for some, but I'm not going to spend an extra $300 to get it, nor am I going to use a progressive for any caliber I don't shoot by the hundreds at a time. I don't own a machine gun. To me, anything bigger than 223/5.56 in a rifle is single stage and turret work.
 
Last edited:
I received another response from RCBS:

All of our presses are made in Oroville. The Pro Chuckers will have an aluminum frame and cast iron linkage arms. The Pro Chucker 5 will have die plates and shell plates available individually, the Pro Chucker 7 will have shell plates individually but the die plate will only come as a plate, powder measure assembly. We have gone back to the tube priming for the chuckers. The lifetime warranty will apply to functionand machine work but not on normal wear and tear on the units.


Thank you for choosing RCBS
Have a great day
RCBS Tech/LM :)

So the Pro 7/5 will have the lifetime warranty and are made in Oroville, California. Apparently the lower linkages and toggle blocks are iron. The toggle block is what usually breaks on a Dillon 550.

I resize rifle cases on my Pro-2000, thousands of them. I use a lube die in station one and the size die in station two. I cam them over and have never had a problem. It is rather quick and easier than doing it on a single stage. I only do 223, 30-06 and 308, calibers that I shoot a lot of.

This year, I am leaning toward a Pro 7. I want to increase my handgun volume over the Pro-2000. A bullet feeder would be nice. I wont use a bullet feeder without a lock-out die or powder indicator. The Pro-2000 will stay mounted on the bench.
 
Last edited:
realgun the Pro 2000 is much better than the 550, I ran them side by side for several months. It should be much better than a 550, they had the 550 to use as a starting point.

I do not think the Pro-2000 is comparable to a 650, there is no case feeder available for it. Brian Enos calls the 650 a pistol caliber reloader, and recommends the 550 for rifle loading. If and when I need faster production, I will by a used 1050. My dillon 550 was used when I got it as well as my Pro-2000.

Don't be ashamed of your 550, it is a good press , tens of thousands of user's like them, and Lee press owners dream of them.
 
I do not think the Pro-2000 is comparable to a 650, there is no case feeder available for it.

Shucks, buckbrush! You really need to spend the $110 for the Auto-Advance kit, so you won't think that!:D The Pro 2K is a 5 station press with a bullet feeder option and a wonderful primer system!

The 650 doesn't come with a bullet feeder or APS. Every press is different with different features....one fits me to a tee and the other fits someone else to a tee. None fits everyone equally as well.....not the new Pro Chuckers, not the very much cast iron Dillon 1050s.

On that different strokes for different folks idea, I actually originally bought the manual Pro 2K version.....not because I wanted a 550 style press, but because I couldn't find an auto-advance version. But I was able to buy the upgrade kit at the same time......so I tried it out manually for about day and a half, and upgraded to auto-advance with the thought that if the automation was too much too fast :rolleyes: I could change it back. There was no further thoughts about manual advance. The giddiness took weeks to get over. :D

Meanwhile I began to address "other" bottlenecks that the new progressive brought to light....you know like trimming & case prep. IME the Pro 2000 is equally good at rifle and pistol.....but rifle brass needs case prep......usually. Nope I haven't tried a lube die or X-die. Maybe I should.....
 
Last edited:
So rcbs is committed back to tube primer feeding on the 7 station. Sounds like they are throwing in the towel on APS priming.

This reminds me of what my dad used to say. "Pete you can't push a rope".


Lifetime warantee and cast iron blocks are great. I still wonder about the aluminum frame. I will still take the wait and see approach for a while.
 
"can't push a rope" referring to? APS or tubes?

APS's demise reminds me of the comic strip "Dilbert." Too often in big corporations, somebody powerful, above the experts makes the decisions.


Lifetime warranty and cast iron blocks are great. I still wonder about the aluminum frame. I will still take the wait and see approach for a while.

I'm leaning that way too,. For sure I will wait to see if the "assembly" disassembles.:D As for the metal mix, I always thought using a stonger part in a weak system just shifts the weakness to somewhere else in the machine.....guess we will see.
 
For sure I will wait to see if the "assembly" disassembles.:D As for the metal mix, I always thought using a stonger part in a weak system just shifts the weakness to somewhere else in the machine.....guess we will see.

Yes, making one part stronger will shift the breaking forces to the next part. Depending on how the design is, it may not be an issue.
 
I wonder why RCBS went with an aluminum frame? One would think it would cost more to retool for aluminum casting? If it could be made out of an iron/steel frame, I bet prospective buyers would pay the additional $20-$50 to have the whole press made out of steel.

Is RCBS trying to keep up with the Joneses? It seems they are trying to compete or stay current with Hornady and Dillon, yet losing the benefits (iron and APS) that RCBS originally made in their previous presses.
 
I wonder why RCBS went with an aluminum frame? One would think it would cost more to retool for aluminum casting? If it could be made out of an iron/steel frame, I bet prospective buyers would pay the additional $20-$50 to have the whole press made out of steel.

When you ask a question of why a company does something related to a product the answer is almost always cost, if not it is ease of manufacture is the next answer.

Aluminum actually costs more than steel per pound (a casting of the same size will be lighter though) than cast iron but is a lot easier to machine with much better tool life.

In other words it's not just the raw material costs they are saving.
 
I wonder why RCBS went with an aluminum frame? One would think it would cost more to retool for aluminum casting? If it could be made out of an iron/steel frame, I bet prospective buyers would pay the additional $20-$50 to have the whole press made out of steel.
I'd think it would be more than that...if you include the time expense of machining and tool head replacement
 
All of the above. Plus Using Aluminum sure hasn't hurt Dillon sales inspite of the breakage, while using cast iron went mostly on deaf ears, buyers not really understanding that the product life of every (quality) cast iron part usually exceeds the user's in a reloading press application.

So then, making them cheaper and selling them not any cheaper is a win, win Dillon discovered long ago, not to mention that enticing died in the wool reloaders with 7 stations is a more sure bet compared to trying to convince them of the many merits of APS. Business...just Business. I give up. :rolleyes: Life goes on.

I'm just hoping sales of APS bench and hand primers will keep them coming long enough for me to get a good supply of "other" colored strips! I have plenty of standard pistol white (large and small). I just need more standard rifle yellow, a few magnum pistol and rifle red & blue, and maybe even a few military orange. I'll never need any benchrest black. New prices on new strips from Midway is high $5.60 for 8 measly strips! Ebay prices on used strips is worse!!!:eek: Best to order the pre-stripped primers to get them.

I'm having a hard time talking myself into the merits of 7 stations, over the 5 with a video powder level display. Keeping my display and using it on a Pro Chucker 7, makes me wonder what in the world to do with seven stations! :D The Pro Chucker 5 with a case and bullet feeder (and a video powder checker) is equivalent to what I have now, but mine is not the stock Pro 2000 either. I am hoping they get the Pro Chucker case feeder to work better than Hornady's does with multiple caliber changes. It's one thing to be set up for bear in one caliber.....entirely another to be equally set up (trouble-free) for several calibers.
 
Last edited:
I would think the "retooling" cost would be the same regardless of frame material. They aren't retooling the Pro 2000 line to make aluminum frames, they're tooling up a new line to make Pro Chucker frames.
 
I'm having a hard time talking myself into the merits of 7 stations, over the 5
I would be interested in the 5 over the 7 as well. But then I size, tumble, trim etc, and prime before running the brass through to load as well. I don't need all 5 on my LNL.

Folks who like to do more at once, and want a powder cop die etc, would like the added stations.
 
I would think the "retooling" cost would be the same regardless of frame material. They aren't retooling the Pro 2000 line to make aluminum frames, they're tooling up a new line to make Pro Chucker frames.

I understand your logic higgite, but it's not the same price. It's just flat cheaper to machine aluminum than cast iron. I just finished applying Aluminum eyebrows, and Alpolic panels to "modernize" an older "Dairy Queen" this week. I was able to cut the material with just carbide wood cutting saw blades in a skil saw. The blade I used cost $60, and can cut through solid 1" thick material if I needed it to. (didn't of course on this project). Had the material been steel, everything would have been harder to do. $200-$500 blades in special equipment with liquid cooling, and the blades still would last half the cuts or less.

The cost savings is real....but the press buyer won't be seeing the savings, RCBS will.

I would be interested in the 5 over the 7 as well. But then I size, tumble, trim etc, and prime before running the brass through to load as well. I don't need all 5 on my LNL.

Folks who like to do more at once, and want a powder cop die etc, would like the added stations.

Yeah, ditto for me too loading rifle, except that the Pro 2000 does primers so well, that I don't use the hand primer like I used to.

And seating using a Gold Medal die is sooo easy, I haven't yet been coerced into building a rifle bullet feeder yet....but when I do it will use the G.M. seater....I'll just figure out a way to dump bullets case-activated like RCBS does into it.

Pistol's another matter: I use every station for that, and that's where 7 might be a good thing. Right now I deprime and bling in a wet tumbler. On the press I size (1), prime, expand, charge (2), bullet feed (3), seat (4), taper crimp (5). Between 2 & 3 I watch the big video picture of the filled case rotate to 3 to prevent squibs or dbl. charges.

If I didn't use video, an extra station would be for a lock-out die. Station 7? Well.....somes like to expand separate so that would shift all the stations one more.....but with RCBS's new powder thru expanders that work so darned well at the bottom of a Uniflow, I question the need for that.

A built-in swager could be nice for some, but brass varies so much in hardness and spring back that swaging is not always a sure thing. In progressives that's a crash and burn moment that stops the momentum instantly. Very annoying to say the least. I found this out swaging old 1967 LC brass once, then later 1972 LC brass.

Personal druthers? I like my bench swager finished by barely touching it to a military reamer on the way to being uniformed in a Trim Mate. The reamer does two things by just touching......1. It shines up the edge with an ever so light bevel, making a swaged case show that it was swaged. And 2. It guides both the uniformer AND the primer to the center of things. No more cases catching an edge on the uniformer and jerking a case out of my arthritic hands, and no more smushed primers that didn't make it to the center in time.

Now then....lets talk 12 stations! Two tiers loading two at a time. Okay, yeah, that's nuts.:D

Really now, the most interesting thing about the new presses is no bumps! No ball and spring! I do want to see one in action!......boy would I love to be able to retro fit my Pro 2000 with that!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top