Search results for query: *

i was privileged enough to spend the day shooting with dave many years ago. a day i think of with a smile. his time, energy, and passing of knowledge to the forums is invaluable. he's a good man, and will be in my thoughts as will his family.

i was privileged enough to spend the day shooting with dave many years ago. a day i think of with a smile. his time, energy, and passing of knowledge to the forums is invaluable. he's a good man, and will be in my thoughts as will his family.

powder, again,what is your personal experience with the sig rifles. you seem to tout them so much, i'm sure others would love to hear your personal experience that has led you to recommend them so highly.

powder, there wasn't any mention of the chart, so why even bring it up? also how many sig rifles have you owned. what is your experience with them?

have you tried the search function? this topic has been covered over and over, with specific threads for "best ar for $1000". you'll likely getthe same old responses that have been given before, save for a few who have changed their minds. best thing to do is, do your own research, as opposed...

murf, i tend towards the 4 5/8 and the 5.5" barrels not because of bling, but ease of carry. the 7.5 inch barrel just seems like a lot of gun to be hanging from my hip even though i'm sure it would be more accurate and offer better range. the reaching out and accuracy is for the range. i...

craigc, that is one beautiful sixgun! that's pretty much what i have in mind. i figured the 5.5 barrel would suffice for now and i could always cut it down later if i wanted. did some searching around and it seems as though the stainless bisley grip frames may be available directly through...

i've read of fixes for the chamber issues on the .45s. does this work, and at what cost? i'm looking at the 5.5 barrel length, so would the extra fps in the .44 matter that much? how much flatter is it, say out to 100-150 yds? i'm leaning towards the .45 because it's already found in the...

for the purposes of accuracy and reach at longer distances, what would you choose? .44 mag or .45 colt? the platform will be a ruger blackhawk (super for the .44). i'll be handloading for both.

what do you mean by too much drop for 300? subsonic will be more accurate and just requires more dope. amount of drop is somewhat irrelevant, is it not?

cz has a customer service department in the usa, hence the name czusa. and they're quite nice folks, too. "shoots slower" is relative, and i'm not sure what you mean by "convertable", but cz does have aftermarket support, albeit not near as much as the 10/22.

i agree, coalman. i mentioned it seemed as though the clackamas guns were bringing a slight premium over the other series 1s. i'm just trying to figure a fair price for both of us. that is if i decide to sell it...still on the fence.

i have an older series 1 kimber classic custom that i'm considering selling to a friend. it's a yonkers gun made iirc in 1996. only has a couple hundred rounds through it, with minor holster wear to the finish. all factory original with no mods. what would be a fair price to ask? i see the...

"better" is relative. relative in that if you want a hard use, stake your life on it gun, there are much better options than rock river. realtive in that if you enjoy high power competition, there are much better options than colt. to my knowledge the chart was a resource for comparing m4...

if it's just to hold you over for a bit and get you to the range. check the for sale sections of various forums and pick the cheapest set that will work with your set-up. carry handles can be found for a song these days.

looks like some decent shooting. what set-up and caliber/ammo?

last i checked you aren't a mod. you want to make an across the board statement feel free, but directing it solely at me is out of line, and does nothing but further hijack the thread. others seem to share the same opinion that i stated, and one person clearly has an issue with it.

i don't see where any "attack" was made. mine was not the first snide comment made in this thread, so perhaps you should direct your's elsewhere.

Pot shots like elementary school is something you seem to know quite well. Clearly you're opinion is not only the only valid one in your eyes, but you seem to equate it to fact. Serious discussions can't be had with fellas that know it all like you, as you keep proving in every thread where...

they sure are cheaper feelng compared to my cz. but then perhaps you're not able to discern quality as well as some of us.;)