This really isn't getting into the legal issues.
No they did not. As you said, the standard for issuing a preliminary injunction is a finding that the petitioner is likely to prevail. "Likely"...
This has been covered multiple times here over the years. And as I look at what I've posted several times I notice that in trying to paraphrase...
It does remind us that the political reality is that a lot of people think some sort of screening to acquire a gun is a swell idea.
Already an open thread on the subject.
Off topic for the Legal Forum.
Which is why there’s really nothing to discuss.
The OP’s question was answered in post 3.
Although it would be a good idea to do the research and study to understand what those limitations, as found by the courts, actually are, mean,...
Yes.
If you post something as true it’s really your burden to support it. Sending others to do your research for you is not appropriate. Now,...
Really not a THR topic.
Speculative.
It doesn’t look like anyone is interested in having a serious discussion about this.
Pretty much speculative and pointless. Whether or not a law is constitutional is a question for the courts. To answer the question the courts...
But see Andrew Branc’s “counterpoint”.
Not really on-topic for the Legal Forum.
You'll need to cite some legal authority to support that. Civil immunity laws in general provide a defense to civil liability for justified uses...
Even in the absence of a safe storage law, a gun owner could well face civil liability if he stores a gun, it gets taken and used to hurt someone....
Well, I am a lawyer, and that’s really not completely accurate. There are a lot of circumstances under which “prior bad acts”, and even hearsay,...
Separate names with a comma.
