Search results for query: *

No...not at all. Every issue that I have discussed is a well-known and well-documented issue. I suggest that people who really need a gun for self defense do the research to confirm what I have said and come to their own conclusions. There is a lot of good information on the web and the...

Here's a good video of a couple of cops getting a case of "Glock Leg" - which seems to be pretty common amongst Law Enforcement. http://gunssavelives.net/blog/video-police-chief-shoots-himself-after-his-jacket-drawstring-causes-negligent-discharge/

Well...Jams and the well-known "Glock Leg" are two of the biggest Glock failings, but let's just stick with the Jams for now. So...yeah, Jams with Glocks are an issue even though a lot of people try to play them down - especially Glock-Boys who have their egos invested in their handgun...

Exactly! What may be the best gun for me may not work well for you, and vice versa.

Sure...why not. There is no one particular Brand or type that I prefer over a Glock - I just want a pistol that works. I want a pistol that doesn't Jam because it doesn't like how it's being held. I mean, if I want something that gets all bitchy about the way it's held, I'll go visit my...

Yeah...i don't care for the Glock Company, either. They have released so many guns with design flaws and then blame it on the user. Seriously, I wouldn't rely on a Glock for self defense.

You said you used Ultramax rounds in your Glock. If I am not mistaken, the Ultramax round is a lead bullet that has been reloaded: a no-no as far as the Glock Corporation is concerned. I don't know why, but here is the webpage that says it: http://us.glock.com/customer-service/faq

I think you had a good idea when you mentioned taking some photos of the failures. Also, have you considered keeping a log book? Personally, I keep a log book on on my guns while they are new and I'm learning their limitations. I have found that a good log book can help me quickly identify a...

Well...I hope it gets resolved. BTW, there are people here that could probably talk you through the problem - but it will be a relatively long and wordy affair because in order to diagnose a problem, a lot of questions need to be asked.

Actually, I don't post all the bad shootings I read about - and there have been more than a few in my hometown of Houston. But...I will talk about the worst ones...the ones that make national news and for which everyone is aware and can discuss with some knowleadge. As far as crime statistics...

I believe you're right. But...in all of these cases a common theme most-often seems to be the need for Vengeance on the behalf of the shooter. And...when a guy picks up a gun with vengeance in his heart, then I think there is a real danger of something terrible and unnecessary happening...

Would you please explain this comment?

here's a court document with a police report: http://www.krtv.com/files/kaarmshooting.pdf Seems like Kaarma went so far as to block the kids exit from the garage and then claimed he was in fear he would be hurt if the kid exited the garage. Then...he blasted the kid. We got us a Real...

The prosecution will probably use the fact that Karma Baited and Ambushed the kid in order to prove Pre-Meditated Murder.

Hey...I'm against shoot someone if ya' don't have to....and Joe didn't have to shoot anyone that day.

Yeah...in his Hysterical Monkey Brain. I heard the audio of that 9/11 call. I heard the pathetic, self-righteous squealings of Joe Horn as he ignored any advice he recieved from the 9/11 dispatcher and worked himself into a pathetic frenzy. Yeah...real American hero is this guy.

I didn't miss the part where he shot both men in the back.

And somehow they get shot in the back despite their "charging"? And...your warning about slander is laughable. Again...the conversation once more devolves into "When can I shoot?"

Yeah...that is my personal code. You got a problem with it?

Under Texas Law, what Joe Horn did was probably legally justified. But it was wrong. It was murder. A Jury should decide guilt or non-guilt based on the law, not on the morality of the circumstances. So, the Grand Jury probably made the right call. If they (the Jury) had made a decision...