Search results for query: *

May I have the code please and thanks in advance :)

The winners thus far have been, Ian Harrison, Chris Reed, Dustin Ellerman, and Chris Cheng

I got that much out of it but I think my brain wasn't working all the way yesterday :banghead:. I personally don't see how retreating out of ones home could prevent an escalation in public. The phrasing just seems awkward to me.

That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me...

Its just hard to keep up with the Birth rate :P

Great thread. It is very important for those of us who keep guns and who may at some point defend ourselves with said guns. Every one who purchases a firearm should be attempting to learn any relevant laws they can. When dealing with the law knowledge really is power.

I may be fuzzy its been a bit since my Criminal Law class however, I think I remember something for Missouri about this. You cannot claim self-defense as the initial aggressor unless, they escalate the confrontation to the point to where they become the aggressor. Its not the exact verbiage...

I think Sam did a great job of showing how its not really black and white. Your motivations and your "goal" so to speak really matter. But it is a personal thing and everyone must judge what works best for them. For everyone's sake I home that most choose well.

Typically when I am really frustrated about something I just need to step away for a bit, and in a safe & constructive manner blow off some steam. For me shooting allows me to forget about it for a minute or set it aside and come back with a different perspective. And even if it still bothers...

I am only really pay attention to the shooting in the show, but is fun enough to watch and lets me drool over things I will never get to shoot lol

Never really came across any too aggressive. Usually a shake of the head and "no cash" and its done.

I don't think it really makes a difference. If things have advanced to the point of mass data collection on US citizens then I am sure they know who all owns firearms anyhow. Unless you have only done person to person sales and never posted anything then the government will have a good idea of...

I have watched it on occasion just to see what guns come through some times it is pretty cool. But all the complaints about the drama I second. It would be nice to see more gun and less talking.

I am definitely seeing more on the shelves now. Pre panic I could find .223 for about 35$ for 100 rounds and at the peak of panic it was about 70-80$ per 100 now I saw some at about 50$ per 100

I will not support the ACLU for the reasons listed above but I agree with the spirit of what you are saying. While we fight hard for the Second Amendment we need to be vigilant of and protect all amendments. I think there is an issue with "wuss-ifaction" in American with all the political...

I read your article and you hit on a lot of my frustrations. Such as calling a standard issue magazine a "high-cap" magazine. I also looked over the rest of your site. I look forward to further posts!

That is what I am trying to figure out.

Personally from what you have said if I were in your shoes I don't know that I would want to use it as a carry gun. If I am not used to a safety I don't think that I would remember to disengage it if I need to use it. Also if I am questioning the safety to carry it without the safety then that...

sidheshooter I am right there with you that is spooky.

Exactly. Its mostly political, may reduce chances of local LEO acting but its still a felony. Even if it is representative will no real world affect. I am hoping it will spur the kind of conversation that we want. It may just be a statement but statements can start or advance movements...