Search results for query: *

No, it doesn't. It's called the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act." Straw purchases are, have been, and probably will always be illegal. So you can't be protected against illegal actions with an act that states "lawful". So if they proved in court that this place knew it was a...

That specific situation doesn't sound rude to me. And it was appropriate because it was at a holster sale area, where such implements are sold. Sort of like someone asking what you carry while you're standing in a gun store. However, to me, when that question is asked outside of gun selling...

I think I can handle 9mm just fine, so I use that.

I don't. I only carry a Glock 19 or Glock 43, not both. The only time I'd consider it is if I'm driving through an area experiencing race riots.

My Glock 19 and Glock 43.

I would at least chamber it, sort of like a dry fire drill, to test it. But yes, I would prefer JHP to FMJ. All day every day.

Nope, never had a problem in 9mm or .380.

I wouldn't bother with it unless this were a Glock 18. The stock guide rods work just fine. IV8888 was running a test on them on YouTube with a full auto Glock 17 and it took until like the 1000-something round mark of full auto for a stock guide rod to melt. Therefore, I doubt you'll ever...

First, I doubt they'll be torn up. Second, you can drive a car over them and they'll still work. My advice: ignore it.

But no shoulder nor concealed carry. Again, you've gone off on a tangent that doesn't work.

Artillery isn't a rifle nor a handgun. I doubt a strong case can be made. No case needs to be made. Trying to draw a logical line from revolution times (nothing semi-automatic) to the modern day can't be done, at least in firearm type. Our guns these days are very different. You'd have more...

I'm not doing your research for you. I doubt "high capacity" weapons were even invented by then. But that doesn't mean anything. Compare that muskets were used on both sides and that a citizen could own one identical to that of the military person of that day. Their guns were identical...

I'd say attend one and make up your own opinion. For me, no. They usually have used guns selling at new gun prices, and the entrance fee is too much money. On top of that, they disarm you at the door. All in all, nope.

Federal Guard Dog. Last time it was Federal HydraShok. You see, I rotate (shoot off) my defensive ammo once a year per their recommendations. Next after I shoot off this defensive ammo: Federal HST.

1) Width is very significant, as the more narrow the gun, the easier to conceal, all other things being equal. Yes, it should affect your evaluation. However, until you actually try the gun out, you won't know. When I first got my Glock 19, I had to dress around it. When I bought my Glock...

"Much more effective"? Not according to the statistics I've posted. Regardless of whether we signed Hague, we tend to try to follow it. It's in our training that HPs aren't allowed except if issued, etc. Honestly i hope they stop trying to follow it.

The problem here is that you're turning this into a caliber war. As such: http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866 There's not a difference enough in the major defensive calibers (9mm, .40SW, 10mm, .45 ACP) to warrant how much money they'd blow on switching to or from any of them.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866 This work?

Thanks. Hence if we can carry hollow points in war, we don't need to change guns. The M9 and any 9mm will work fine with quality JHPs. But somehow i have doubts because something as big as a change to Hague laws would surely be major news. Still, that's good news. Military cops already...

First, link please. I'm very hesitant to believe that. Second, if that's the case, then we don't need a replacement for the M9. Just give 'em JHPs. So then we don't need to switch calibers: 9mm is enough. (And it's enough for the FBI as well.) Third, all I care about is handgun hollow...