Search results for query: *

I have a hard time believing that it's secret. It passed the House, The Senate, the conference committee. How exactly is it secret?

Terrorists. Frankly, I think the government has done a great job handling this war.

I am not a LEO, however, I too agree that a LEO doesn't get to pick and chose what laws needs to be enforced and what laws don't. That is the job of politicians. Either LEOs cooperate in enforcing what they need to enforce or they get other employment. That said I do think they should use the...

Your analogy doesn't work. The international community sanctioned war with Iraq in 1991. To gain the cease fire Hussein had to sign off on some committments. Such as documenting the destruction of his WMD He never did this. Therefore, the cease fire agreement has been breeched.

I think it should be mounted on Pres. Bush's wall.

Who isn't happy about Saddam's capture? From the WSJ online December 15, 2003 1:43pm EST BY JAMES TARANTO Monday, December 15, 2003 1:32 p.m. EST Who's Whooping It Up Now? We don't know for sure that Saddam Hussein was directly involved with the attacks of Sept. 11, but...

I loved the "Great Escape"

There are is much evidence that Hussein has supported Al Qaida. Here is one. To make this firearms related Hussein helped Al Qaida train in using firearms in their terrorist assaults. ;) Posted on Wed, Feb. 05, 2003 Iraq harboring al-Qaida network, Powell says By Warren P...

I am afraid that what you heard and read are inaccurate.

No government official said there were no links between Al Qaida and Hussein. What they said was there was no concrete evidence of links between Hussein and directly to 9 11. That is a big difference.

I hope they fry him.

Justice wasn't achieved because they didn't reach conclusions that you wanted them to. So their conclusions are suspect according to you because there were too many investigations. That is interesting logic. My guess is that there were numerous investigations because there was no doubt a...

thedude, good luck to you, but you have about as much chance of getting the likes of Keith and cmichael to engage in a debate on those terms as a mushy snowball does in a sauna in Hell.<< That you have not one shred of evidence to backup your position while I posted 13 different...

Dude you are kind of late to the game here. Agricola you once again say that it needs to be investigated, but yet still completely ignore that there were thirteen separate invesigations all concluding it was an accident. If there is fault it's within the US. The US assured Israel that...

Do you now accept that it was an accident?

What is the difference? The main issue is whether the attack was an accident or not an accident. The overwhelming evidence based on 13 separate investigations is that it was an accident. You can not cite one investigation that concluded that it wasn't an accident.

Whoops. I meant concluding it was an accident.

LOL Nice attempt to try and turn the tables. You said that the evidence is that it wasn't accident. You said that it wasn't investigated. I documented 13 separate investigations all concluding it wasn't an accident. Yet you still don't accept it. What exactly do you base your...

Your analogy doesn't work. 10 of the investigations are from US government entities, such as the US Court of Inquiry, the CIA, the NSC, the House, the Senate, etc, etc. Are you implying they were all involved in the vast Jewish conspiracy to cover it up? These are 13 separate...

The statement says that the particular pilot didn't drop bombs. Even what you posted said it was in the second attack and not the first. BTW I did make a mistake I intentionally said I posted 10 separate organziations concluded that it was an accident. That isn't true I posted 13 separate...