Search results for query: *

Awesome, Bangswitch Mandatory firearms training does not violate one's right to bear arms. Along with our rights is a responsibility and duty to exercise said right in a manner that does not expose others to danger. Awesome job. I support you.

I'm not a troll

I asked for this post to be closed. This post is driving me insane.

Let's leave it there.

I'm confused too. I thought it would be clear to you guys to help me out. Some person mentioned it

No, I'm asking a serious question

Do the Antis force the pro gunners to bear the cost of everything and not let the tax payers make life easier for the gun owner?

Stop mentioning Chicago. That's a cop out

I'm actually concerned about this statement But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control How true is this...

U.S. gun owners have made it worse

I'm a completely sane American

I live in a state in the United States. I'm not British but American.

Its different now

Capnmac, The contraction of the expression "[by] G_D's blood" is extremely blasphemous. Noted. I didn't know it was.

Gun control does work

Yeah, I'm also for socialized medicine

Why are you so opposed to gun control? Even my proposals?

The tax payer. The psychiatric exams should be free of charge to the gun owner.

"Once you recognize it is a mental health problem you will be part way to solutions that work." DID I just say gun owners such undergo mental health checks? I know that it's a mental health problem. You don't care about Mental health. If you cared about it, gun owners would propose to do...

Then why are you so scared that solving mental health in this country is some form of socialism? Why are you not really wanting to solve mental health?