For whatever reason, i have always found 22 revolvers to have awful triggers. I sold a 1948 K22 Masterpiece (a thing of beauty) because the double action pull was so bad. I have had the same experience with two different Ruger 22 revolvers. Considering the hammer/striker needs to function...
I feel lucky now that i got a LCR 357 that locks up tight and has a great trigger. One thing I always preferred about S&W over Ruger was the stock trigger pull. The LCR really caught my attention with its trigger. I really have to start testing different defensive ammo in it. So far it's just...
That is the transfer bar. They started putting them on revolvers when they took the firing pin off the tip of the hammer back in the 80's. It's basically a drop safety for a revolver. The internal firing pin cannot be activated unless the trigger is pulled and the transfer bar is in line with...
a) .38 special
b) 6"
c) square
d) six
e) adjustable
f) Serial #K302169 (on the bottom of grip frame). 5502 on the crane
g) K-38
Sometime around 1957, just before the start of model marking
Three S&W Revolvers
a) .357 Mag
b) 4"
c) square
d) 6 shot
e) adjustable
f) Serial Number N1610XX. No other identifying numbers
g) 28-2
a) .22 LR
b) 6"
c) square
d) 6 shot
e) adjustable target (partridge?)
f) Serial Number K1970X on the bottom of the grip.
g) K-22. Also says...
I couldn't be happier with my HK P2000 9mm LEM. I am no Glock basher. I would actually love to get a Glock 20 (10mm), but I really feel like the HK is a finely crafted piece of machinery. To me it's the nicest of the plastics. The Glock is more of a utilitarian tool. Either will get the job...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.