Search results for query: *

Actually, many Indian Reservations have been described as being like third world countries. It really isn't something to laugh at either, it's a national disgrace what our government has done to those people.

Try to have a point next time. I didn't call anyone a name either. Can you read what I'm posting or do you need someone to explain it to you?

Actually the Indians won all three wars that they had with Pakistan.

The Nazis took away weapons too.

Think about it, pro gun supporters are often called "gun nuts," but are we really the people who obsess over weapons? No, it is usually the people who want to take away guns that spend all of their time and energy telling everyone who will listen how evil guns are and this and that. I mean, I...

Yes, white people (and others) mock Indians because they eat curry and they supposedly smell bad because of it. I knew Indians in High School, I saw it firsthand.

Oh my God that was funny. The guy with the binoculars on top definitely is the best part. And not long before racism finds its way into the discussion. How nice. Now why is this site called "Thehighroad" again?

Yeah, just read the article. It doesn't belong here, and it insults me by saying that I can't come up with my own arguments and need the author's help to do it. Talk about ego. Plus it was just dumb in general. This quote was particularly stupid: Since when is a silencer a safety device? I...

If the article says that, then yes it doesn't belong here. I confess I have not read it yet, but will comment on it when I do. As for the thread question, I carry because I don't want to be a victim.

Just because they have been used for a long time does not make them Constitutional. If an EO changes the nature of a law, or acts as a de facto law, it is Unconstitutional.

The 2nd Amendment says nothing about concealed carry. It doesn't even explicitly say we can keep our guns. It says we can "keep and bear arms," but what does that mean? Where do we keep them? Where do we bear them? That is all up to interpretation by the SC. In the past, the SC has said that...

Congress is a part of the Federal Government, so yes, the Federal Government can make law. The agencies you cited are a part of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government, and even they (the EPA in particular) can make de facto law. It is not Constitutional, but it happens.

Yes they can. That is how my CC permit is accepted by other states.

The write ins can be challenged in the courts I believe. As for EO, those have to be overruled by the next President. They are Unconstitutional in any event (at least in my opinion). And they are law.

Yes, it does. It is called the Supremacy clause. It basically says that Federal Law trumps state law. It's why the people in California can't smoke pot. As for the original question, yes, they can overrule federal law by passing an amendment to the Constitution, but it is unlikely to ever...

If they are breaking the rules and no one steps in, it is only a matter of time before they pose a threat to someone else.

I agree with this. There are a lot of unknowns that an officer has to face when making a traffic stop, and letting them know that you have a weapon and that you are carrying it legally can only help both sides.

Dunham's was going to be my suggestion too. You should definitely take a look there, they have a pretty decent selection. The last time I looked at an AK in Dunham's I found a great one for $450, but they also have good ones (the WASR should be the cheapest) for $200 and up. I agree, try Dunham's.

I kind of like New Jersey.

I was just curious if anyone knew anything about CC on Indian Reservations, since I believe that they are actually semi autonomous "nations" that have different laws than the state that they are in (hence casinos for example). Does anyone know if the laws of an Indian Reservation trump state...