The way I read the bill, it's the companies compliance with the law that gives them some legal immunity. However, non-compliance with the law means they are no longer legally immune from (not-liable) for anything if somebody goes postal.
So what are you saying, that some people are too stupid to own guns? (This I agree with, btw.) Maybe I'm just reading something into your post that isn't there, but it seems like you're saying we need some way of keeping the idiots away from guns. How does one test for such idiocy? How...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.