Search results for query: *

DMF, You Said, "As for claiming that the Lautenberg Amendment is ex post facto law, that is simply untrue. The Lautenberg Amendment does not criminalize behavior that occurred prior to the law taking affect, only behavior that occurred after the law went into affect.*The crime, being...

Please scroll back to my post with the legal definition of a "violent" misdemeanor and tell me if you still feel that way.

Update. http://ia700300.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.caed.215824/gov.uscourts.caed.215824.25.0.pdf

I wanted to edit my OP but I guess this site locks you out after a while. Here is the first page of a similar thread on calguns. http://calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=417935 If you know anyone who has been impacted by lautenberg or feels that the lifetime misdemeanor ban is wrong...

This explains what is going on.

That is exactly it. The Feds are not recognizing California's version of expungement.

Razorback, California, and many other states, have a process for expungement of misdemeanors. The Feds use to recognize this process but they have changed policy. There is even a memo from the California attorney general stating this change. California had to fire many police officers and...

Update. http://ia600300.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.caed.215824/gov.uscourts.caed.215824.24.0.pdf Don Kilmer responded here. http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=417935&page=5

Lautenberg is also being applied in violation of the 10th. It says right in the law that if ones civil rights are restored by the state, the federal lifetime gun ban is lifted. The Feds are not doing this. California, Wyoming and other states are having this problem. This case is also a states...

Mr. Kilmer filed a notice of supplemental authority. http://ia600300.us.archive.org/35/it...15824.23.0.pdf Interesting.

I was asked to post some supporting documentation showing that ANY touching of clothing or the person is battery. This is mainly based on California jury instruction but it is similar in many places and SCOTUS talks about it in reference to 922. While a second amendment argument was not...

You do not have to strike anyone to get a DV. Anyone who says they have no problem with a few innocent people being wrongly persecuted for the safety of others is not a good American in my opinion. What about the oath we took as service members? I am on my phone and about to start work but I...

This is a strong 10th amendment state rights argument. California and other states specifically specify the amount of time one looses gun rights for a MINOR crime. The also issue expungement but the Feds are illegally ignoring these measures. Wyoming sued the Feds stating that they issued an...

The Madison Society is suing Eric Holder and the feds over the lifetime federal ban on "domestic violence" misdemeanants. People who know about this issue know just how easy it is to become prohibited due to one of these convictions. The infamous Lautenberg amendment. The case is Enos V...

I'd check Section 42 of the revised code. Paragraph 11, Subsection c, romanette II-VI. Danbrew, do you have a link? I had no luck finding the info. Thank you

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?p=2835643#post2835643 I have done quite a bit of research on this subject and can not get a concise answer on what is "similarly situated" as per the lautenberg amendment. This site lists some case law and it seems that "similarly situated" is...