Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

“Terrorists and Guns: The Nature of the Threat and Proposed Reforms.”

Discussion in 'Legal' started by NelsErik, May 5, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NelsErik

    NelsErik Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    291
    Location:
    Payson, Arizona (Up on the Rim)
    Not sure if this is taboo and falls under politics or falls under gun control legislation...


    Today in Washington

    Gun Control - The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will be holding a hearing at 10am today titled “Terrorists and Guns: The Nature of the Threat and Proposed Reforms.” The hearing will be an airing of two gun grabbing bills proposed by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). S. 1317 is a Lautenberg bill that grants Atty. General Eric Holder the power to “deny the transfer of a firearm” if he “determines that the transferee is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism” and ”has a reasonable belief that the prospective transferee may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.” The reasonable belief standard removes due process rights for Americans to own a gun and gives the Attorney General too much discretion on who is defined as a prohibited person. Lautenberg’s other bill is S. 2820 is a bill that would set up a de facto national gun registry for each gun purchase for 6 months. Taken together, the two Lautenberg bills would allow Attorney General Eric Holder the power to consider anyone on the terrorist watch list, approximately 400K people, a prohibited person under federal gun control law without any due process and set up a national gun registry with records “destroyed” after 6 months.

    Looks like the current administration is going after guns after all...
     
  2. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,462
    Location:
    Morgan County, Alabama
    They can barely grab a terrorist from off a plane and they think they can stop terrs from buying guns?????:rolleyes:
     
  3. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    MS, USA
    Yep, that doesn't look like it would be abused at all. It sounds way too extreme to even make it out of the commitee.
     
  4. shockwave

    shockwave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,182
    Location:
    Florida
    Whenever I see things like this, I wonder what the current system in place is. If you're a suspected terrorist, can you go out shopping for firearms? I would expect that if they think you're engaged in terrorism that you wouldn't pass a background check. But if you can, then that's a loophole that needs to be closed. The Times Square "Failbomb" suggests that we're on the cusp of seeing some domestic terror cells coming online and we really don't need a replay of the Bombay hotel business here.
     
  5. dovedescending

    dovedescending Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    575
    Location:
    NW Georgia
    If there is a Bombay hotel recap here, you can bet it'll happen in Chicago, NYC, or somewhere in **********. Terrorists are smart, and they'll attack where they know nobody will fight back.
     
  6. thezoltar

    thezoltar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    60
    The Bombay hotel was not a home grown group. They came from Pakistan.
     
  7. 2ndAmFan

    2ndAmFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    387
    Location:
    Texas
    There was some stuff in the media awhile back about persons on the government's terrorist watch list not being prohibited from buying firearms. It doesn't surprise me they're taking some kind of action, but like all such actions the potential for abuse is very high.
     
  8. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,536
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    That's not the point. The purpose isn't to stop "known or suspected terrorists" from buying guns; it's to grant the Attorney General the power to summarily deny or revoke the RKBA of anybody, without having to submit evidence in court or otherwise provide due process.
     
  9. Trebor

    Trebor Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,817
    They are talking about everyone on the "no fly" list as being a suspected terrorist.

    You know, that same "no fly" list that had Senator Kennedy on it, and that small child? The "no fly" list where if youre name is similiar to that of a terrorist, you might not be able to get on a plane.

    You really think it's a good idea to turn that "no fly" list into a "no guns" list?

    If someone is *really* a suspected terrorist, wouldn't it be better to just arrest them?
     
  10. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    The probability of abuse is obvious, but anyone who thinks that any law will stop terrorists - home grown or otherwise - from obtaining firearms or making improvised explosives must also believe that we don't have an illegal drug problem because they are illegal, and therefore aren't available.

    Clearly, and without question, terrorists would never use straw buyers or the black market in illegal guns - because doing so would be against the law.

    On this issue, Democrats have managed to redefine the term, "brain dead."
     
  11. JustinW

    JustinW Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    This is the real reason to be concerned. How long before people who support the constitution are classified as "potential terrorists" and added to the list, or people who don't go along with the government's current agenda or other political dissenters? And once you are on the list I'm almost sure it'll be next to impossible to get off of it. Then voila, you are "legally" stripped of your constitutionally protected rights.

    This is an interesting read from Aaron Titus, Privacy Director, of the Liberty Coalition, who is one of the people on the second panel about how this whole system would work in reality. http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=b01b7e09-fa8a-43c5-8ae7-f21063540d0d

    A choice quote from it:
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2010
  12. nyrifleman

    nyrifleman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    231
    Location:
    Chenango County, NY
    You mean like when MIAC declared that people who have Ron Paul, Ralph Nader and Bob Barr bumper stickers are potential terrorists?
    http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2009/mar/14/fusion-center-data-draws-fire-over-assertions/

    I may be wrong, but I believe NRA bumper stickers were also a red flag. Oh well, guess that means I'm screwed.
     
  13. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,536
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    There are plenty of Dems that support it, and Lautenberg (a Dem) has been a strong supporter from day 1, but don't let the Republicans off the hook. This was originally a Bush administration proposal, and was one of the pet projects of Attorney General Alberto "No Such Thing as Habeus Corpus" Gonzales. Fortunately, Congress was pretty skeptical of it back then, and I think they still are now.
     
  14. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    Funny, here I thought that according to most of the left leaning media that we, the USA are the biggest terrorist in the world, so shouldn't that mean that all the congress creepers would be denied their guns, what would the cali creatures do if they couldn't get a new CCW piece?
     
  15. shockwave

    shockwave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,182
    Location:
    Florida
    And this bill was introduced by New York Rep Peter King (R-L.I.). This is a republican proposal. This is a gun-grabbing member of the GOP.
     
  16. Leanwolf

    Leanwolf Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,070
    Location:
    Idaho
    Something that is not being discussed here -- but I assure you the far left, NeoLib Progressive politicians have in their minds -- is their long time push to ban the private sales of firearms face-to-face. As they call it, closing the "gun show loophole."

    Considering the push to pass legislation banning gun buying by anyone on the "terrorist watch list ," the far left NeoLib Progressives will say, "Hey, if the evil, worker peasant rabble gunowners still are allowed by us to sell their private firearms face-to-face, what is to stop all those millions of people we've placed on the "terrorist watch list" from just circumventing the Federal laws and buy privately owned firearms from the worker peasant rabble and then use them to hijack airplanes, sink ships, blow up buildings, and gun down babies and little children and mom and everyone else?"

    They'll scream, "We must ban private sales of firearms and close the 'gun show loophole'!! No one can buy or sell a gun without our permission!!"

    Watch and see, boys and girls. Remember, to the Marxist Socialist Facsist inspired far left NeoLib Progressives... there are never, ever, enough laws restricting our, the worker peasant rabble, freedom.

    They never, ever disengage, either.

    L.W.
     
  17. leadcounsel

    leadcounsel member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,365
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I think terrorists are more likely to buy guns outside of normal channels first of all.

    Secondly why don't they focus on the common stuff that HAS been happening such as the shoe bomber, the underwear bomber, and the NYC bomber...? None of these are attempted terrorist acts using guns.
     
  18. Hunt480

    Hunt480 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    445
    Location:
    Georgia
    I thought the same thing all I can figure it must be using this for the back door... you can hear'm hummin.
     
  19. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    42,964
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Good that the subject was brought up as a warning so folks could begin contacting their particular congress persons. But, the discussion itself has become mostly political...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page