I consider the 10mm to be ballistically more similar to the .357 Magnum than the .41 Magnum, and certainly less potent than .44 Magnum. When I carried a .40 Glock G22 duty pistol, 2002 to 2004, I bought a 10mm G29, with which to experiment for personal-time carry. I liked it, except that it was just a bit large for my hands. It was not yet clear that I would be allowed to “qual” with a Glock that had a grip reduction job, but I read about an upcoming release of the “Short Frame” Glocks, so I sold or traded the G29, with plans to try one of the smaller-gripped Short Frame version. Well, this was interrupted when I transitioned to the SIG system, but I recently returned to using 9mm Glocks, so, that put the acquisition of a G29 Short Frame or Gen4 back onto my radar screen.
I have long hands, so love the feel of an N-Frame grip, but do not have long fingers, so, cannot adequately reach the trigger of an N-Frame, if the trigger is in the most-forward, DA position. In the Eighties, I just had to not only own a Model 629, but just had to carry it while on police duty. Shooting that 629, with an improper hold, was NOT good for the long-term health of my right hand! I sold the 629, many years ago.
I can properly hold a Ruger Super Redhawk, with an original-pattern GP100 factory grip installed, so, my potential to again shoot .44 Magnum returned, but when I bought an SRH Alaskan, it was .454/45 Colt. So, .45 Colt, not .44 Mag, won that contest.