10mm..: the new outdoorsman's choice.?

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Armored farmer, May 13, 2021.

  1. Sour Kraut

    Sour Kraut Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Messages:
    318
    Location:
    Idaho
    I switched out my Glocks for Springfields. Not a Glock basher…… I just prefer the ergos of the XD series and shoot them better. Here’s my 10mm XDM with Venom Red Dot. Great shooter. My next 10 will be Springfield 1911. 59650564-876B-4DE3-B8E3-8032B960B850.jpeg
     
  2. Mark_Mark

    Mark_Mark Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2021
    Messages:
    2,933
    I like the grip safety!
     
  3. Onty

    Onty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2003
    Messages:
    336
    10 mm, 6”, 1911 TRP from Springfield Armory:

    Springfield-1911-3-1024x516.jpg

    Despite my preference for revolvers, dreaming about this one since it came on the market. Unfortunately, get it here is mission impossible.
     
    WisBorn, Sour Kraut and Demi-human like this.
  4. LoonWulf
    • Contributing Member

    LoonWulf Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,346
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Ive got a stumpy 357, 44 spc GP-100, and 44mag Ruger Super blackhawk, but often as not my 6" RIA ends up getting stuffed in a holster when we go pig hunting.
    The .357 or GP are probably the most practical of the lot since the 15rnd capacity of the 10s double stack frame isn't any use here, and both it and the 44mag are bigger and heavier.....but I LIKE carrying the 10 for some reason.
     
  5. Phaedrus/69

    Phaedrus/69 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,086
    Location:
    Big Sky Country
    I don't want to come across as pedantic but I'll throw it out there only because you mentioned t twice- the 10mm is not a .40 Super! The .40 Super uses a .45 Win Mag case necked down to 10mm. But I agree that if there was a broader selections of firearms chambered for .40 Super it could be an excellent woods gun, just a smidge better than 10mm.
     
  6. brutus51

    brutus51 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,201
    Wasn't aware that cartridge existed.:uhoh:
     
    Phaedrus/69 likes this.
  7. Onty

    Onty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2003
    Messages:
    336
    Here it is:

    500px-40_Super_Case_Dimensions.jpg

    Here are tests from Glock, 6" barrel:



    Very impressive, quite close to 41 magnum.
     
  8. Micro

    Micro Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Location:
    In The Swamp
    I do a lot of outdoor photography, and most of it in big black bear country, and much of it of big black bears. My avatar is a 500lb+ black bear I stumbled across, I've never had a problem with a bear. The one in my avatar did snap its jaws at me and slap its paws in the water. It's the only bear I've ever come across that was remotely aggressive. I got my photos and moved on. One thing I've noticed is that bears are kings and they know it. I've met bears coming towards me on trails. The smaller ones will simply turn off the trail and go around you. The bigger ones won't and it's you that has to move. But I've never had one high tail it and run while I was on foot. While very remote, I don't count out the possibility that an encounter can go south. So I carry my Glock 20 10mm. If I'm lugging a tripod or a camera with a huge lense, I might go with my Glock 29. I think it's a somewhat adequate black bear defense pistol. Moreover, it gives me some comfort on remote trials where sometimes I come across questionable characters who creep me out far more than the knowledge that there are bears about.

    9ASFN9l.jpg
     
  9. Paul R Zartman
    • Contributing Member

    Paul R Zartman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2020
    Messages:
    577
    Location:
    Redington Shores Fl
    Blasphemy to say 38.40 is a 10mm, just plain BLASPHEMY, the reloading gods are rolling over in their graves, whats this world coming to...Buy Em Books and Send them to School and then they turn on you...Blasphemy...
     
  10. STI

    STI Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2020
    Messages:
    83
    Lack of bullets why not cast them yourself? Issue solved 125.jpg
     
    tommy.duncan and Armored farmer like this.
  11. Elktrackstw

    Elktrackstw Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2021
    Messages:
    15
    10mm is way more under rated than most guys understand
    I have several 357 mags and the baby 5 shot gets the easy ride in woods more than the 686 or 19 4” just simple due to size but all best are off during hunting season I carry the delta elite every time loaded with 180 xtp over long shot powder @ 1300 & 3 full 9 round mags ....44 mag has more power by slim margin 200 xtp @ 1450 out of 4” 629 but omg it’s heavy for hiking/hunting hard
     
    Armored farmer and Sour Kraut like this.
  12. mcb

    mcb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    5,346
    Location:
    North Alabama
    vUxCAZHl.jpg

    I own nearly identical revolvers (6.5-inch S&W N-frames) in both cartridges. My 10mm Auto is pushing a 200gr XTP at 1250 fps and is pretty close to a max load. I'm shooting a 240gr XTP at 1370 fps in the 44 Mag and I am not even pushing 44 Mag to its full potential. There are shooters out there shooting 300+ gr bullets at over 1300 fps from moderate length 44 mag revolvers (5"-8"). 10mm Auto has a lot of nice characteristics but being only a "slim margin" behind 44 Mag in the mass and energy department is not one of them. When both cartridges are loaded with heavy for caliber bullets and to SAAMI max pressure the 10mm Auto tops out at ~220gr and ~750 ft-lbs of energy, the 44 Mag will push over 300 gr bullets and easily approach and even exceed 1200 ft-lbs of energy.
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2021
  13. DR505

    DR505 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    569
    Location:
    Idaho
    mcb - why is it that people tend to ignore physics when touting "their" cartridge? KE=1/2 mv2 is a constant irrespective of one's preferences. The 10mm, within SAAMI limits, can never approach a .44 magnum. At least not in this universe. The 10mm is a good cartridge, but it is definitely NOT a .41 or .44 magnum.
     
  14. BreechFace

    BreechFace Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2020
    Messages:
    1,423
    I've tried to point this out in the past, and sometimes I can convince a person and sometimes it falls on deaf ears.

    The 10mm compares closely to 357 Magnum, but a 41 or 44 it is not.
     
  15. Choctaw

    Choctaw Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Texas-Along the Preston Trail
    The deer and pigs I kill with mine don't seem to understand ballistics. lol
     
    ECVMatt, Sour Kraut and BreechFace like this.
  16. The Glockodile

    The Glockodile Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2020
    Messages:
    214
    That's what we aim for when we neck it down to 9mm.

    I'll have to check, but if I recall correctly - we manage to approximate a .357 Magnum with lighter (120+ grain) bullets (this is supposedly an extremely effective mankilling Gold Standard of sorts, highlighted by extreme tacticulosity).
     
    BreechFace likes this.
  17. BreechFace

    BreechFace Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2020
    Messages:
    1,423
    Don't get me wrong, I love the 10mm, more than the 41 or 44; but it is not on the same level of power as those.
     
  18. brutus51

    brutus51 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,201
    None of this matters because everyone knows that in the very near future technology will make the 9mm punybellum the equivalent of all three.o_O
     
    SwampWolf, Sour Kraut and CDW4ME like this.
  19. BreechFace

    BreechFace Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2020
    Messages:
    1,423
    Not much ground isn’t covered between 9mm and 10mm. Those two cartridges along with 22LR and I wouldn’t feel underserved for my needs.

    We get that you don’t like the 9mm Parabellum but it’s hard to argue with a cartridge that has stood the test of time FAR better than all others save 22LR. Disagreeing with the merits of a 120 year old cartridge that’s been through countless wars and that happens to be the greatest seller currently is like peeing into the wind, short term satisfaction but leaves the discussion cold.
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2021
  20. SwampWolf

    SwampWolf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,287
    Location:
    North Central Ohio
    I agree. And I think the real (or best) reasons for carrying a 10mm auto as opposed to a revolver chambered in .41 Magnum or .44 Magnum are ease of carry and ammunition capacity. Nothing wrong with this tradeoff, depending on the circumstance(s).
     
  21. ECVMatt

    ECVMatt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,989
    I was going through some old pictures tonight and found one from a hunt in Texas. I have spent many days like this and the Glock 20 is just about perfect for this role. It is lightweight, pretty weatherproof, handy, powerful enough, and easy to carry extra ammo in loaded magazines. If I were to ever be able to go back to this ranch to work and just hang out ( I spent a few years here in my early 20's), I would probably carry the 20 most of the time.

    Glock20Texas.jpeg
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2021
  22. brutus51

    brutus51 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,201
    It's not that I dislike the 9mm, I have several but it is what it is. My comment was aimed at the claims by gun writers and others that technology has made the 9mm the equivalent of the .45ACP and .40S&W, so why not the 10mm as well?:scrutiny:
     
  23. BreechFace

    BreechFace Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2020
    Messages:
    1,423
    I've always took the improvements to the 9mm projectile selections as it has now made the 9mm a good/great option for threats. The 9mm projectiles of past were deep penetrators without reliable expansion or vice versa, new bullet technology (that can be applied to all projectiles) afforded the 9mm to meet criteria that was afforded in the past only to wider meplat projectiles such as the 40 and 45 ACP.

    Now maybe the gun writers didn't get that point across or made the wrong interpretation of the projectile makers improvements, but it is not hard to see that the gap between 9mm and the 40/45 has significantly narrowed in performance when it comes to balancing penetration and expansion. That is the real improvement afforded to the 9mm. The 40 already hit the sweet spot on penetration and expansion even with older bullet technology as well as the 45acp. The projectile improvements did improve the 40 and 45acp, but they didn't need as much help in the same area as the 9mm gained, so the gap in performance narrowed.

    I like all the service calibers (used to carry daily a 40, which is a great round), but when good controlled expansion bullets came out for the 9mm and the improvements showed up in tests it was clear that the projectile manufacturers achieved a great improvement for the 9mm where the improvement didn't mean as much to the 40 and 45acp as their projectile meplat already afforded some of those characteristics.

    So to say it simply the 9mm closed the gap, quite significantly in penetration/expansion performance as compared to 40 and 45acp. So when one is taking consideration magazine capacity, firearm size, recoil, cost of ammunition for training with the improvements to the 9mm projectiles, 9mm starts to look very good as compared to 40 and 45acp as opposed to in the past the 9mm suffered from either due to poor penetration due to rapid expansion, or poor expansion and excessive penetration.

    In Lucky Gunner's ballistic tests:

    9mm - Winchester 147gr Ranger T-Series
    5-Shot Average Depth = 18.7"
    5-Shot Average Expansion = 0.74"

    40 S&W - Remington 180gr Ultimate Defense
    5-Shot Average Depth = 15.5"
    5-Shot Average Expansion = 0.79"

    45 ACP - Winchester 230gr Ranger T-Series
    5-Shot Average Depth = 14.5"
    5-Shot Average Expansion = 1.00"

    One can see that the performance is pretty close between all three cartridges. I picked what I thought the best balance of penetration and expansion for each of the respective cartridges. As you can see the 9mm might be a touch on the over-penetration, the 40 S&W load looks like a good balance of penetration and expansion but the expansion is the same as the 9mm. The 45 ACP great expansion, but a little bit shallow on the penetration, would be better if closer to 16" if one needs to shoot through a limb and reach vitals.

    So with the projectile improvements other we've been afforded decision based variables such as: cost, recoil, firearm size, and magazine capacity starts to play a greater role in decisions on cartridge when performance has been narrowed.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2021
  24. BreechFace

    BreechFace Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2020
    Messages:
    1,423
    I have a friend who was backpacking with a group of fathers and daughters maybe 10 people in the group that were being followed on both sides of the trail by wolves, the fathers recognized this and started throwing rocks at where they last saw and heard the wolves on each side and kept everyone close. They eventually got to a point on the trail while moving forward in all of this where the wolves just left. I told him it was probably on the edge of their territory and they backed off. A few of the dad's were armed, but this is an example where increased capacity in a firearm might be a good option to have. And I hunt in areas that have 6-8 tag limits on wolves so their population is healthy and there are grizzly bears but in low population in the area as well. So,15+1 of 10mm with an additional 15 round reload sounds like a great option, for me. Other's situation and circumstances can dictate a different mode of protection.
     
    Elktrackstw, ECVMatt and SwampWolf like this.
  25. Climb14er

    Climb14er Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Denver, Colorado
    Climbed in brown and black bear country for many years. Carried a .44Mag, 240gr loads and the beginnings of bear spray and fortunately, luckily, avoided any personal interaction with them. Saw 'em at a distance and waited for them to move away as I moved away slowly. Gotta say, the hair on my neck was 'up' even at a distance. Moved to a Glock 20SF and loaded with Underwood 200gr hard cast. Backup mag Underwood 165gr JHP, with Counter Assault bear spray. A lot of firepower! Not going so much into brown territory lately, been carrying Glock 19 with Buffalo Bore +P+ Penetrators, backup mag 124gr +P Gold Dots and Counter Assault. I shoot the Glock 19 better than the .44mag and G20. If I feared anything, it was a Mountain Lion from above or behind, when solo, on a very early early morning, 2-5am approach. Carry what makes you feel comfortable!
     
    Elktrackstw and ECVMatt like this.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice