Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

115, 124, 127, 135, 147 grain

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Ghostrider_23, Oct 28, 2007.

?

Which 9mm round would be the best choice for PD

Poll closed Nov 27, 2007.
  1. 124 grain

    39 vote(s)
    41.1%
  2. 127 grain

    14 vote(s)
    14.7%
  3. 135 grain

    4 vote(s)
    4.2%
  4. 147 grain

    24 vote(s)
    25.3%
  5. 115 grain

    14 vote(s)
    14.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ghostrider_23

    Ghostrider_23 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    413
    Of the rounds listed, which one would be the best for personal protection out of a sub compact 9mm????

    Which would have better stopping power and expansion????

    Please vote and explain why and where you got your information.
     
  2. hotpig

    hotpig Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    923
    Location:
    SW Illinois St Louis metro east
    The round can very depending on the gun and ammo. Ranger T-Series 147gr out of a G26 is pretty awsum. T-Series ammo is not as velocity Dependant as older ammo designs.

    Gold Dot in order to keep up put out the SB line and Federal did the HST. The neat thing about new ammo designs is that all of the old rules are void. Great thing other than the SB is you can buy one box of ammo and it will work in all of your guns of that caliber.
     
  3. Clipper

    Clipper Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,243
    Location:
    Mt. Morris, MI.
    So I take it you refuse to hear about the 115gr?
     
  4. hotpig

    hotpig Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    923
    Location:
    SW Illinois St Louis metro east
    115 is still popular in full ,compact, and sub compact guns.

    I would guess since three of the four weights listed are middle of the road weights, that must be what the poster prefers.
     
  5. C-grunt

    C-grunt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,791
    Location:
    Phoenix Az
    I voted 127 even though Im a fan of the heavier rounds. Out of a sub compact though, Im sceptical about them with their already fairly low MV. Out of smaller barrels I like the mid range weights to keep velocity up but still have some weight behind it. Truthfully though, I think any of the weights with a good bullet is going to serve you well.
     
  6. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,846
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
    added 115 gr
     
  7. trueblue1776

    trueblue1776 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    2,050
    Location:
    Alabama
    Voted 115, but my heart belongs to the 100 gr.
     
  8. cslinger

    cslinger Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,459
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I tend to like medium weight in 9mm so I choose 124 grain.
     
  9. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,393
    Location:
    wichita
    I voted 124 which I use in more guns but I use whichever will shoot POA I have a tauri 905 that loves 147s.I also wouldn't hesatate to use 115+p+
     
  10. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    I'm a Winchester Ranger 127gr +P+ type of guy, so I obviously voted 127gr.
     
  11. saltydog452

    saltydog452 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,705
    I voted 115 because it functions in my guns*...haven't tried enought 124 to have an opinion yet.

    Cor-Bon 115 JHP, Wal-Mart 115 Ball, federal 9BP, and 9BPLE seem to function just dandy. I don't see any need to change.

    salty.


    *..edit.

    There are a couple of 9X19s that I haven't fooled around with enough to get a preference. But for the Kahrs, BHPs, and Colt P-9, I'll stay with the 115s mentioned above.

    sd.
     
  12. sinistr

    sinistr Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    229
    if it feeds it, doesn't matter....
     
  13. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    124 grain seems too offer the best of both worlds, good penetration with a fair
    amount of expansion~! :scrutiny: :cool: ;)
     
  14. bigmike45

    bigmike45 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,021
    Location:
    Texas
    My two 9mm guns seem to prefer the 147's for accuracy. I really could not elaborate on penetration or expansion. I have yet to test that.

    bigmike45
     
  15. Ghostrider_23

    Ghostrider_23 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    413
    115 grain too please

    YES :what: I did and do want opinions on the 115 grain bullet chambered in 9mm.

    Please give me your advise on these grains and which one to use
     
  16. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,393
    Location:
    wichita
    the 115 loads I'd recomend would be in no particular order corbon dpx,win ranger +p+ or fed 9bple +p+
     
  17. Marshall

    Marshall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,569
    Location:
    Oklahoma, Green Country
    I'm with ALA DAN. 124gr.

    BTW, nice win by the VOL'S this weekend. ;)
     
  18. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    i choose the 115gr, the +p+ varient is a great one. as well as the 124+p which is another great alternative. either one will serve you well.
     
  19. Grandpa Shooter

    Grandpa Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    930
    Since you did not list what handgun you are wanting to use it in, I would have to say whichever one functions well in YOUR gun. I have played around with most of them in different guns and there is a major difference in what will feed reliably. The 115g that feeds in your gun is a lot better than one heavier that jams it up. Unless you have tons of money to test them all, you're never gonna know for sure.
     
  20. UnTainted

    UnTainted Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    615
    I'd say the 124 +P
    Speer:
    Gold Dot Short Barrel

    I think they understand the subcompact expansion and velocities for their bullet the best.

    if this was just my favorite 9mm weight for a full size or 4" gun, then I'd say differently: I'd say 115s in the summer with heavier for the winter, but for the short barrel, I really like the theory and research behind the GDSB.
     
  21. saltydog452

    saltydog452 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,705
    Grandpa knows...

    Its what is reliable through your magazines and out of the ejection port.

    Polls don't count.

    I started with 115s and have seen no reason to change. That make/model (115 Federal 9BP, and 9BPLE) was suggested by an aquainence whose observaions I respect. And they were reliable through whatever I have tried them through..to date.

    If there is a realistic perceived need for more mass, try a .357, 9X21, 9X23, .40, etc.

    It is, I think, the platform, and what is reliable in it, not whats being advertised in the latest magazine article as new.


    salty.
     
  22. putteral

    putteral Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    378
    Location:
    Homosassa, Florida
    I voted 147gr. I carry it. The bigger the better!
     
  23. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,940
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    Haven't had a whole lot of experience with each of these weights, but eventually I will. I think the heavier would be better.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page